test [7:29245]
test Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29245t=29245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: worst company [7:25033]
Marshal Schoener wrote: Agreed, however there is great 3rd party support available for Checkpoint from many vendors. UUNet has a very good support program for Checkpoint. No matter who is supporting it though, Checkpoint's license procedure is horrible! I once went 6 months from eval license to eval license because we couldn't get a permanent license to work properly. That being said, in my opinion, there is no better firewall. Regards, -Original Message- From: Jim Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: worst company [7:25033] CheckPoint = (great product) - (any support infrastructure). It is without a doubt the least supported product by a manufacturer I have ever seen. I have outstanding TAC cases over a year old! They charge a fortune for support and maintenance, which you must have, and you get nothing for it. The only thing that actually keeps it running are the private boards and mailing lists. It is extremely easy to use though and they own 60% of the market? There are things you can do with CheckPoint that Cisco cannot even begin to emulate. -Original Message- From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: worst company [7:25033] Hello, I had a very bad experience with Checkpoint and am wondering if anyone had the same problem. One of my clients wanted to try Checkpoint VPN-1 so I filled out online eval form a month ago. A sales rep called me the next day and said a reseller would contact me in 5-10 days (5-10 minutes would make more sense). I didn't hear nothing in 3 weeks so I filled out online eval form again (I lost that rep's phone number) and another sales rep called me said the same thing. Now another week passed and I still didn't hear nothing. My client is very unhappy so he decide to go with Cisco. Is Checkpoint's business so good that they couldn't handle or what? Anyway, Checkpoint lost my client and I would never work with them again. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com I have you beat, I waited 8 months for a perm. license from Checkpoint. -Andrew Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=25082t=25033 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CID: AS400 [7:25037]
The As/400 is considered a midrange computing platform. It runs its own operating system on its own hardware (Os/400). I like em. -A George Murphy CCNP, CCDP wrote: Yes, exactly. John Tafasi wrote: Hello Group, Just a little question. Is AS400 an IBM mainframe computer? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=25097t=25037 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
newsgroup [7:14993]
hi, can any one tell me a good news group of sun and unix Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14993t=14993 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Radius Encryption [7:4638]
Hello, I want to setup the environment below. I want user1 User2 to be authenticated before being able to access the Internet. I can setup radius to be used instead of local authentication to log into the router. How do I set it up to be used as access control to the Internet? What IOS do I need? Is there a special IOS for this? Will the 2611 Access Server do this? Also I need the Transaction to be encrypted from the User to the Radius Server. All suggestions welcome!! - -- User1 | | Cisco | User2 |-- | Router | --- Internet | |--| | | |---|-| | TACACS+ | | or RADIUS| | Server | - Help, Andre Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4638t=4638 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bgp regular expressions
Hello, Does anyone know how to tell the router to allow all AS's except for Private AS's for Ingress traffic? I know that .* tells it to allow all paths, but how do I exclude 65xxx (Private AS's)? I know about the keyword "remove-private-as", but this is for Egress (outbound) traffic. As far as I know it's for when your using confederations and such. Is this something I need to be concerned with? I'm not sure if this is something I should be spending my time on or not. Is it necessary to block inbound Private AS's? Please excuse my ignorance, I'm still learning! Thank You, Andre _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP Reg Expressions
Hello, Does anyone know how to tell the router to allow all AS's except for Private AS's for Ingress traffic? I know that .* tells it to allow all paths, but how do I exclude 65xxx (Private AS's)? I know about the keyword "remove-private-as", but this is for Egress (outbound) traffic. As far as I know it's for when your using confederations and such. Is this something I need to be concerned with? I'm not sure if this is something I should be spending my time on or not. Is it necessary to block inbound Private AS's? Please excuse my ignorance, I'm still learning! Thank You, Andre _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP Reg Expressions
Hello, Does anyone know how to tell the router to allow all AS's except for Private AS's for Ingress traffic? I know that .* tells it to allow all paths, but how do I exclude 65xxx (Private AS's)? I know about the keyword "remove-private-as", but this is for Egress (outbound) traffic. As far as I know it's for when your using confederations and such. Is this something I need to be concerned with? I'm not sure if this is something I should be spending my time on or not. Is it necessary to block inbound Private AS's? Please excuse my ignorance, I'm still learning! Thank You, Andre _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
update source loopback 0 ?
Hello, What is the reason for using the command UPDATE SOURCE LOOPBACK 0? I read the explanation that says it specifies the interface to be used as a source IP address of the BGP session with the neighbor. What does this mean exactly? What does this do for me exactly? neighbor 123.12.3.1 remote-as 1 neighbor 123.12.3.1 update-source loopback 0 neighbor 123.12.3.1 next-hop-self neighbor 123.12.3.1 soft-reconfiguration inbound What does this do to the neighbor 123.12.3.1's routing table if anything? Thank You, Andre _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
communities
Hello, when I set up a community using the no-export keyword. When I use this keyword AS1 is telling AS2 I'm giving you the 10.10.20.0 route, but don't pass it to AS3. Is this correct? In short it's not for the immediate neighbor, it's so that neighbor doesn't pass it to anyone else? 10.10.20.0 AS1--AS2AS3 10.10.30.010.10.10.0 10.10.10.0 Do not export 10.10.20.0 to AS3 router bgp 1 neighbor 10.10.10.2 remote-as 2 neighbor 10.10.10.2 send-community neighbor 10.10.10.2 route-map commun-out out access-list 1 permit 10.10.20.0 0.0.0.255 route-map commun-out permit 10 match ip address 1 set community no-export Thank You, Andre _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Juniper
is very hard to get your hands on a Juniper router... they are selling like hotcakes. I guess you get what you pay for. and did you hear the latest news, Cisco's lead on their MPLS design no longer works for Cisco. Guess who he works for now? You're right, Yakov Rekhter now works for Juniper. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the New Product 4908
Once cisco produce the 4908,how it can sell his 3508? ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Local Director load balancing
Deepak ravindra wrote: Local director does load balancing based on -processor load, - memory load, -Web server /App load -I/O load and many other such parameters Its a typical Layer 4 switching which ensures high availablity - a much needed feature for e-biz sites and N/Ws. Cheers Deepak "Dave Santeramo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does local director do simple round robin load balancing or can they balance by processor load and/or disk load? thanks ___ To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax, all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think Local Director is unuseful,u should use CacheFlow to support the load banacing! ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
