Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
Just wanted to say thank you all for your help. yes i had to clear up the nat translation table before removing it. worked wonders ;) thanx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31625t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
Hi, can anyone tell me how i go about removing a static entry from the router ?i am using nat (#ip nat inside source static ) , however when i remove that entry i get : %static entry in use, cannot remove . that host is no longer up and i am running out of solutions, any suggestions are obviously welcome ;) thanx. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31560t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
clear ip nat trans paul wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, can anyone tell me how i go about removing a static entry from the router ?i am using nat (#ip nat inside source static ) , however when i remove that entry i get : %static entry in use, cannot remove . that host is no longer up and i am running out of solutions, any suggestions are obviously welcome ;) thanx. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31562t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
Also shut down the local lan interface in case some lan client tries to go out to the internet while you are changing nat. Some busy sites this happens at. And include an * after the trans for all the translations. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
You dont shut down the interface. Just remove the 'ip nat outside' or other such necessary command from the interface. It's far less affecting to the router to remove the nat command than it is to shut down an interface which would possibly cause a change in the route table, forcing calculations, etc. Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Also shut down the local lan interface in case some lan client tries to go out to the internet while you are changing nat. Some busy sites this happens at. And include an * after the trans for all the translations. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31579t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
Good point. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
My preference in this is to just scope the translation clearing to just the affected static, then quickly delete the static translation which I think sridder was saying. In particularly busy environments an inbound acl on the internal/external interfaces will keep traffic from triggering the static translation while you can delete it and then remove the additional acl denies. If you do it all carefully no other endpoints will have service distrupted and that should always be a goal. AMR wrote: You dont shut down the interface. Just remove the 'ip nat outside' or other such necessary command from the interface. It's far less affecting to the router to remove the nat command than it is to shut down an interface which would possibly cause a change in the route table, forcing calculations, etc. Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Also shut down the local lan interface in case some lan client tries to go out to the internet while you are changing nat. Some busy sites this happens at. And include an * after the trans for all the translations. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31584t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
just want to say thanx for all your suggestions. yes, i had to clear up my ip nat translations before removing that entry. thanx. ;) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31595t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
basically you need to remove the nat inside or nat outside command from the interface, then clear the translations and then you can remove it -Original Message- From: c1sc0k1d [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2002 20:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560] clear ip nat trans paul wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, can anyone tell me how i go about removing a static entry from the router ?i am using nat (#ip nat inside source static ) , however when i remove that entry i get : %static entry in use, cannot remove . that host is no longer up and i am running out of solutions, any suggestions are obviously welcome ;) thanx. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31619t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
