Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-30 Thread Tom Martin
Salvatore,

ebg-multihop is not required for load balancing.  It can be beneficial 
to use a loopback to peer from/to, similar to IPX internal networks 
provide better load balancing for NetWare servers.

If you feel it's a good idea to peer to/from loopack interfaces 
(redundancy, better balancing) then you'll need ebgp-multihop since you 
are adding hops.  If you have multiple directly connected interfaces to 
the BGP neighbor and don't use loopback interfaces, you don't need 
ebgp-multihop.

- Tom

Salvatore De Luca wrote:
 Understood..  but does the command neigh x.x.x.x ebgp-multihop X by
itself
 provide load-balancing? I could be wrong.. but from my undrstanding this
 just states that you have the capability of peering with neigh that are not
 directly connected.. You could very well acheive loadbalancing when 2 EBGP
 routers peer with its neighbors loopbacks.. Yes.. in this case you would
 need to be directly connected.. so why would you need neigh x.x.x.x
 ebgp-multihop... Please enlighten me with your thoughts..




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69755t=69611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-30 Thread Salvatore De Luca
Thanks Tom.. good explanation! This was my thought to the tee.. Yes I agree
with cisco that it does not hurt to add it to add value to the design.. But
as you just stated.. ebgp-multihop is NOT necessary for load balancing
That was my point all along.. Just wanted to clarify my point so I am not
mistaken..

Thanks!! 
Sal


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69769t=69611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-29 Thread ramesh_cisco
BGP load balancing can be done using BGP peering on loopback address .And
you have to add static routes in


your routing table for loopback ip address and mention next-hop as serial
links ip addresses/serial interface


example:


nei loopbackip remote-as asnumber


nei loopbackip ebgp-multihop number 


and then


 


ip route loopback ip 255.255.255.255 serialx


ip route loopback ip 255.255.255.255 serialy


 


hope this will help you


Ramesh

Brian W. wrote:



The way I've seen 2 paths used is by peering with a loopback interface and
using
neighbor peerip ebgp-multihop in the config.

Brian

- Original Message - 
From: Azhar Teza 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 3:16 PM
Subject: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]


gt; If BGP route has two equal paths to the same destination, can it do load
gt; balance by installing the command? maximum-paths 2
gt;
gt; ___
gt; Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
gt; The most personalized portal on the Web!
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at  http://email.indiatimes.com
Buy The Best In BOOKS at http://www.bestsellers.indiatimes.com
Bid for Air Tickets @ Re.1 on Air Sahara Flights. Just log on to
http://airsahara.indiatimes.com and Bid Now !




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69671t=69611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-29 Thread Salvatore De Luca
Understood..  but does the command neigh x.x.x.x ebgp-multihop X by itself
provide load-balancing? I could be wrong.. but from my undrstanding this
just states that you have the capability of peering with neigh that are not
directly connected.. You could very well acheive loadbalancing when 2 EBGP
routers peer with its neighbors loopbacks.. Yes.. in this case you would
need to be directly connected.. so why would you need neigh x.x.x.x
ebgp-multihop... Please enlighten me with your thoughts..


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69736t=69611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-28 Thread Brian W.
heres the cisco guide on it.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/icsbgp4.htm#2351

Bri

- Original Message - 
From: Salvatore De Luca 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]


 I personally prefer Peering with Loops myself.. the EBGP multihop command
 has absolutley nothing to do with loadbalancing. It it used for peering
with
 neighbors whom are not directly connected.. There are various ways of
 performing BGP load balancing.. Metric..route-maps.. etc.. Pick your
flavor.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69646t=69611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-28 Thread YASSER ALY
Yes you can load-balance traffic to the same destination over 2 equal 
logical paths using
maximum-paths 2

Using Loopback address ip to peer and acheive load-balancing to the same 
destination will require
either to use process-switching - not recommended - or enable CEF and do  
per-packet load-balancing 


Regards,
Yasser


From: Brian W. 

The way I've seen 2 paths used is by peering with a loopback interface and
using
neighbor peerip ebgp-multihop in the config.

 Brian

- Original Message -
From: Azhar Teza
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 3:16 PM
Subject: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]


  If BGP route has two equal paths to the same destination, can it do load
  balance by installing the command? maximum-paths 2
 
  ___
  Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
  The most personalized portal on the Web!
_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69645t=69611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-28 Thread ian williams
No

- Original Message - 
From: Azhar Teza 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:16 PM
Subject: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]


 If BGP route has two equal paths to the same destination, can it do load
 balance by installing the command? maximum-paths 2

 ___
 Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
 The most personalized portal on the Web!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69651t=69611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-28 Thread Troy Leliard
Folllowing on from everyone else, we often make use of loopbacks for
internal peering, that way you will always have redundant paths to iBGP
peers, however when peering with external peers / isp we make use of the
external facing interface ip.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69661t=69611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-27 Thread Azhar Teza
If BGP route has two equal paths to the same destination, can it do load
balance by installing the command? maximum-paths 2

___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69611t=69611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-27 Thread Brian W.
The way I've seen 2 paths used is by peering with a loopback interface and
using
neighbor peerip ebgp-multihop in the config.

Brian

- Original Message - 
From: Azhar Teza 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 3:16 PM
Subject: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]


 If BGP route has two equal paths to the same destination, can it do load
 balance by installing the command? maximum-paths 2

 ___
 Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
 The most personalized portal on the Web!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69622t=69611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-27 Thread Salvatore De Luca
I personally prefer Peering with Loops myself.. the EBGP multihop command
has absolutley nothing to do with loadbalancing. It it used for peering with
neighbors whom are not directly connected.. There are various ways of
performing BGP load balancing.. Metric..route-maps.. etc.. Pick your flavor.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69632t=69611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]