CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0
OK... I've been studying now for almost 4 months. I just want to make sure I do really well though and I don't feel like I'm quite ready just yet. But my concern is that I've been studying all of the 1.0 material and I've only got another month left to take it yes? So my question is this, is the 2.0 exam really THAT much more material? Is it significantly more difficult/tricky? I'm just trying to decide if I should rush in and take the 1.0 because it's what I know, or whether I should take a couple months more to learn the added 2.0 material. Any thoughts? Thanks all ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0
I sat the new course, ICND, and took the old test. There were things like VLANs and switching in the course that were not on the 1.0 test or in the 1.0 prep material. I think that Cisco has the requirements for each up on the web site. Ben ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0
Thanks Ben, I'll check it out ""Benjamin Walling"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I sat the new course, ICND, and took the old test. There were things like VLANs > and switching in the course that were not on the 1.0 test or in the 1.0 prep > material. I think that Cisco has the requirements for each up on the web site. > > Ben > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0
I took the CCNA 2.0 beta (passed) and used Todd Lammle's study guide for 640-407. A couple of months ago Lammle was on brainbuzz.com and suggested a few extra subjects that were on the test. -brainbuzz transcripts- Q: wl1516 Hey Todd,when is you new CCNA book coming out and what is different from old book? Speaker: tlammle I have added a chapter on layer two swtiching, VLANs, STP and ISL. Coming out in May. Just use the Lammle study guide and search cisco.com for the above subjects and you should be ok. I also have experience but the guides should be sufficient. Good luck and get experience so Cisco certs aren't watered down. Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ted Nugent Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 4:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0 Thanks Ben, I'll check it out ""Benjamin Walling"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I sat the new course, ICND, and took the old test. There were things like VLANs > and switching in the course that were not on the 1.0 test or in the 1.0 prep > material. I think that Cisco has the requirements for each up on the web site. > > Ben > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0
I hear you Mike. I'm currently a sysadmin at a university here in San Diego. Getting tired of doing help desk work(going on 2 years now) and have been working with the Cisco Cat 5k switches we have(on the blades that don't have anyone plugged in yet) so I am getting *some* experience. Don't worry, I'm serious about it and won't add to the "watering down" of the cert. Thanks for the response and the info. It's much appreciated. Dave ""Michael Munoz"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I took the CCNA 2.0 beta (passed) and used Todd Lammle's study guide for > 640-407. A couple of months ago Lammle was on brainbuzz.com and suggested a > few extra subjects that were on the test. > > -brainbuzz transcripts- > > Q: wl1516 > Hey Todd,when is you new CCNA book coming out and what is different from > old book? > > Speaker: tlammle > I have added a chapter on layer two swtiching, VLANs, STP and ISL. > Coming out in May. > > > Just use the Lammle study guide and search cisco.com for the above subjects > and you should be ok. I also have experience but the guides should be > sufficient. > > Good luck and get experience so Cisco certs aren't watered down. > > Mike > > > > > -Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Ted Nugent > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 4:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0 > > > Thanks Ben, > > I'll check it out > > > ""Benjamin Walling"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > > I sat the new course, ICND, and took the old test. There were things like > VLANs > > and switching in the course that were not on the 1.0 test or in the 1.0 > prep > > material. I think that Cisco has the requirements for each up on the web > site. > > > > Ben > > > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0
Don't worry about it. The 2.0 exam was easy I passed it Friday while only studying for 2 weeks. There is a lot less subnetting then 1.0 and more lan technologies (ie. vlan, trunking, etc...). I got a 946. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ted Nugent Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 3:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0 OK... I've been studying now for almost 4 months. I just want to make sure I do really well though and I don't feel like I'm quite ready just yet. But my concern is that I've been studying all of the 1.0 material and I've only got another month left to take it yes? So my question is this, is the 2.0 exam really THAT much more material? Is it significantly more difficult/tricky? I'm just trying to decide if I should rush in and take the 1.0 because it's what I know, or whether I should take a couple months more to learn the added 2.0 material. Any thoughts? Thanks all ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
