RE: DLSW Icanreach [7:70154]
You should do bit-swapping because the routers will speak in non-canonical addressing. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70164&t=70154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DLSW Icanreach [7:70154]
There is a lot of confusion about running dlsw+ between two routers. For example, If a there is a peer relationship between r1 and r2. r1 config, dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 2.2.2.2 r2 config, dlsw local-peer peer-id 2.2.2.2 dlsw remot-peer 0 tcp 1.1.1.1 both r1 and r2 have ethernet host. host on r1's mac-address is 1234.4321.0001 Now I want r2 to reach an ethernet host only. my statement would be on r1 dlsw icannreach mac-address 1234.4321.0001 mask .. dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive. Is the above statement correct? or will I have to do a bit-swapping since the ehternet only understands cononial format, and dlsw understands non-cononial format, then it should be like that dlsw icanreach mac-address 483c.c383.0080 mask .. dlsw icanreach mac-exculsive. Please confirm when to do bitswapping in pure ethernet enviroment. Thanks, Teza ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70154&t=70154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DLSW Icanreach [7:70154]
Token Ring uses non-canonical addresses. There shouldn't be a need to swap addresses if both hosts are on Ethernet. Priscilla Azhar Teza wrote: > > There is a lot of confusion about running dlsw+ between two > routers. For example, If a there is a peer relationship between > r1 and r2. r1 config, dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 dlsw > remote-peer 0 tcp 2.2.2.2 r2 config, dlsw local-peer peer-id > 2.2.2.2 dlsw remot-peer 0 tcp 1.1.1.1 both r1 and r2 have > ethernet host. host on r1's mac-address is 1234.4321.0001 Now I > want r2 to reach an ethernet host only. my statement would be > on r1 dlsw icannreach mac-address 1234.4321.0001 mask > .. dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive. Is the above > statement correct? or will I have to do a bit-swapping since > the ehternet only understands cononial format, and dlsw > understands non-cononial format, then it should be like that > dlsw icanreach mac-address 483c.c383.0080 mask .. > dlsw icanreach mac-exculsive. Please confirm when to do > bitswapping in pure ethernet enviroment. Thanks, Teza > > ___ > Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com > The most personalized portal on the Web! > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70165&t=70154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
