Re: More Info (OSPF and IP Classless)
When I did my original testing, both routers were in area 0. When I get home tonight I'll try putting the default-advertising router into a different area just for grins. I'll also try changing the default advertisement to a type 1 external instead of type 2. I have no idea why that would have an effect here, but who knows... John > Just want to see the result by using different type of area. > > By using ospf routing protocol with no ip classless, the route distribute > from the other > router behave ip classless. > > PS. Did you read the other thread > > ""Katson PN Yeung"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó > 99s52g$bp9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:99s52g$bp9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > "ip classless" or "no ip classless" only affect the way the router lookup > > the ip route table. It does not related to how you define the ospf area or > > how you redistribute the route (inc the default route). > > > > > > ""wind"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 99s3lo$8v1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:99s3lo$8v1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Using different type area with differnet option redistribute default > > route, > > > still the same result? > > > > > > Would like to hear the result? > > > > > > rgds; > > > Vincent > > > > > > "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Here is a link verifying that my understanding of 'no ip classless' is > > > > correct! > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html > > > > > > > > So, referring to my other threads, why is OSPF overriding classfull > > > routing > > > > table lookups? I'd rather not retype the whole thing, so if you'd > like > > > the > > > > details of my experiments, refer to the other threads. I just wanted > to > > > > post this link to show that I wasn't entirely crazy! Maybe a little, > > but > > > > not entirely. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > John the Not-entirely Insane (formerly John the Cheerful, PKA John the > > > > Monday Grump) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > Send a cool gift with your E-Card > > > > http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More Info (OSPF and IP Classless)
Just want to see the result by using different type of area. By using ospf routing protocol with no ip classless, the route distribute from the other router behave ip classless. PS. Did you read the other thread ""Katson PN Yeung"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó 99s52g$bp9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:99s52g$bp9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > "ip classless" or "no ip classless" only affect the way the router lookup > the ip route table. It does not related to how you define the ospf area or > how you redistribute the route (inc the default route). > > > ""wind"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 99s3lo$8v1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:99s3lo$8v1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Using different type area with differnet option redistribute default > route, > > still the same result? > > > > Would like to hear the result? > > > > rgds; > > Vincent > > > > "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Here is a link verifying that my understanding of 'no ip classless' is > > > correct! > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html > > > > > > So, referring to my other threads, why is OSPF overriding classfull > > routing > > > table lookups? I'd rather not retype the whole thing, so if you'd like > > the > > > details of my experiments, refer to the other threads. I just wanted to > > > post this link to show that I wasn't entirely crazy! Maybe a little, > but > > > not entirely. > > > > > > Regards, > > > John the Not-entirely Insane (formerly John the Cheerful, PKA John the > > > Monday Grump) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > Send a cool gift with your E-Card > > > http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ > > > > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More Info (OSPF and IP Classless)
"ip classless" or "no ip classless" only affect the way the router lookup the ip route table. It does not related to how you define the ospf area or how you redistribute the route (inc the default route). ""wind"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 99s3lo$8v1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:99s3lo$8v1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Using different type area with differnet option redistribute default route, > still the same result? > > Would like to hear the result? > > rgds; > Vincent > > "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Here is a link verifying that my understanding of 'no ip classless' is > > correct! > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html > > > > So, referring to my other threads, why is OSPF overriding classfull > routing > > table lookups? I'd rather not retype the whole thing, so if you'd like > the > > details of my experiments, refer to the other threads. I just wanted to > > post this link to show that I wasn't entirely crazy! Maybe a little, but > > not entirely. > > > > Regards, > > John the Not-entirely Insane (formerly John the Cheerful, PKA John the > > Monday Grump) > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > Send a cool gift with your E-Card > > http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More Info (OSPF and IP Classless)
Using different type area with differnet option redistribute default route, still the same result? Would like to hear the result? rgds; Vincent "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Here is a link verifying that my understanding of 'no ip classless' is > correct! > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html > > So, referring to my other threads, why is OSPF overriding classfull routing > table lookups? I'd rather not retype the whole thing, so if you'd like the > details of my experiments, refer to the other threads. I just wanted to > post this link to show that I wasn't entirely crazy! Maybe a little, but > not entirely. > > Regards, > John the Not-entirely Insane (formerly John the Cheerful, PKA John the > Monday Grump) > > > > > > ___ > Send a cool gift with your E-Card > http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More Info (OSPF and IP Classless)
Here is a link verifying that my understanding of 'no ip classless' is correct! http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html So, referring to my other threads, why is OSPF overriding classfull routing table lookups? I'd rather not retype the whole thing, so if you'd like the details of my experiments, refer to the other threads. I just wanted to post this link to show that I wasn't entirely crazy! Maybe a little, but not entirely. Regards, John the Not-entirely Insane (formerly John the Cheerful, PKA John the Monday Grump) ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
