Re: OSPF Routing [7:49982]
Did this solve your problem? ""John Brandis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > No i did not, I completely forgot that. > > Would that be the cause of this routing issue ? > > -Original Message- > From: Robert D. Cluett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, 29 July 2002 3:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OSPF Routing [7:49982] > > > Question, > > Do you have the "ip classless" command on both routers? > > ""John Brandis"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi All, > > > > Got 2 routers back 2 back working. > > > > RouterA: > > int s0 192.168.10.1/24 > > int e0 192.168.7.1/24 > > int loopback 0 192.168.70.1/24 > > > > routerb: > > int s1 192.168.10.2/24 > > int e0 192.168.3.1/24 > > int loopback 0 192.168.30.1/24 > > > > I try to use ospf routing in summary on each router by > > > > router ospf 20 > > network 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 > > > > However, I outside of directly connected subnets using that. To have full > > conectivity to the network, I have to have on for example router a > > > > router ospf 20 > > network 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > network 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > > > then my routes will work. Should I not be able to simply use a summary of > > 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 on both routers thus enabling me to all the > > routes ? Or is it part of OSPF that all the networks that I wish to > > distribute must be defined on each router ? > > > > Thanks all > > > > John Brandis > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > visit http://www.solution6.com > > visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. > > > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > > > * > > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you > cannot > > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, > please > > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the > > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business > of > > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50089&t=49982 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Routing [7:49982]
No i did not, I completely forgot that. Would that be the cause of this routing issue ? -Original Message- From: Robert D. Cluett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 29 July 2002 3:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF Routing [7:49982] Question, Do you have the "ip classless" command on both routers? ""John Brandis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > Got 2 routers back 2 back working. > > RouterA: > int s0 192.168.10.1/24 > int e0 192.168.7.1/24 > int loopback 0 192.168.70.1/24 > > routerb: > int s1 192.168.10.2/24 > int e0 192.168.3.1/24 > int loopback 0 192.168.30.1/24 > > I try to use ospf routing in summary on each router by > > router ospf 20 > network 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 > > However, I outside of directly connected subnets using that. To have full > conectivity to the network, I have to have on for example router a > > router ospf 20 > network 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > network 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > then my routes will work. Should I not be able to simply use a summary of > 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 on both routers thus enabling me to all the > routes ? Or is it part of OSPF that all the networks that I wish to > distribute must be defined on each router ? > > Thanks all > > John Brandis > > > > > > ** > > visit http://www.solution6.com > visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > * > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49986&t=49982 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Routing [7:49982]
Question, Do you have the "ip classless" command on both routers? ""John Brandis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > Got 2 routers back 2 back working. > > RouterA: > int s0 192.168.10.1/24 > int e0 192.168.7.1/24 > int loopback 0 192.168.70.1/24 > > routerb: > int s1 192.168.10.2/24 > int e0 192.168.3.1/24 > int loopback 0 192.168.30.1/24 > > I try to use ospf routing in summary on each router by > > router ospf 20 > network 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 > > However, I outside of directly connected subnets using that. To have full > conectivity to the network, I have to have on for example router a > > router ospf 20 > network 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > network 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > then my routes will work. Should I not be able to simply use a summary of > 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 on both routers thus enabling me to all the > routes ? Or is it part of OSPF that all the networks that I wish to > distribute must be defined on each router ? > > Thanks all > > John Brandis > > > > > > ** > > visit http://www.solution6.com > visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > * > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49985&t=49982 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Routing [7:49982]
Hi All, Got 2 routers back 2 back working. RouterA: int s0 192.168.10.1/24 int e0 192.168.7.1/24 int loopback 0 192.168.70.1/24 routerb: int s1 192.168.10.2/24 int e0 192.168.3.1/24 int loopback 0 192.168.30.1/24 I try to use ospf routing in summary on each router by router ospf 20 network 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 However, I outside of directly connected subnets using that. To have full conectivity to the network, I have to have on for example router a router ospf 20 network 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 then my routes will work. Should I not be able to simply use a summary of 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 on both routers thus enabling me to all the routes ? Or is it part of OSPF that all the networks that I wish to distribute must be defined on each router ? Thanks all John Brandis ** visit http://www.solution6.com visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49982&t=49982 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]