OSPF over frame relay
All , I am studying configuring OSPF over NBMA ,POINT-POINT and point-multiple point ,boradcast. Does any one has examples of configuration with diagrams. Best Regards , sami __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF over Frame-Relay
I have attach 4 Cisco router config's, how to setup a lab OSPF over Frame-relay.. Have fun Bottom router-config.ZIP
OSPF over frame relay
I was wondering if anyone could help me out. I need to implement OSPF over frame relay. I have a hub and spoke topology for the frame relay. There are 3 main hubs each with about 20 sub-interfaces on them (all point to point). I am looking for the best way to implement OSPF. I was thinking of a couple of things. First I could make the hub routers area 0 and then have the spokes be a totally stubby area. I was also thinking of dividing the frame network into 4 sections. Area 0 as my backbone and then 3 areas (one area at each of the hub sites). Has anyone implemented such a thing? Thanks in advance for the help. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF over frame relay
I've implemented a similar setup to your second thought - area 0 across the hubs and a separate area for each set of hub 'spokes'. Hub routers are ABRs. If your spoke sites have more than one router each you'll need to watch out for your areas getting too large, but it's not likely to be a problem. Works fine. I'm not quite clear on your first suggestion - are you meaning to put all of the spoke sites into the same stubby area? Not sure what you're gaining by doing that. You'll still have all your intra-area routes, which unless you have more network than you've mentioned, is virtually everything anyway. And it would be a fairly large area in terms of number of routers, although it would probably be OK. If you mean each spoke is a separate area, that sounds like way too many areas on the hub routers to me. I'd go with your second choice, but then that's what I'm familiar with :-) JMcL -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 10/05/2000 13:28 --- "mjburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/05/2000 12:35:05 Please respond to "mjburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc:(bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA) Subject: OSPF over frame relay I was wondering if anyone could help me out. I need to implement OSPF over frame relay. I have a hub and spoke topology for the frame relay. There are 3 main hubs each with about 20 sub-interfaces on them (all point to point). I am looking for the best way to implement OSPF. I was thinking of a couple of things. First I could make the hub routers area 0 and then have the spokes be a totally stubby area. I was also thinking of dividing the frame network into 4 sections. Area 0 as my backbone and then 3 areas (one area at each of the hub sites). Has anyone implemented such a thing? Thanks in advance for the help. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over frame relay
Hi Sami, Have a look at: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/22.html Rich On Jan 29, 9:10pm, sami natour wrote: > Subject: OSPF over frame relay > All , > I am studying configuring OSPF over NBMA ,POINT-POINT > and point-multiple point ,boradcast. > > Does any one has examples of configuration with > diagrams. > > Best Regards , > sami > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >-- End of excerpt from sami natour -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over frame relay
I am actually having same problems. This part is poorly explained in most of the BCRAN prep materials. Could some one kindly enough to explain the differences between NBMA, PTP, and PTM with respect to OSPF config? Best Regards, Shan > All , > I am studying configuring OSPF over NBMA ,POINT-POINT > and point-multiple point ,boradcast. > > Does any one has examples of configuration with > diagrams. > > Best Regards , > sami > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF over Frame-Relay
If a router reboots when you hit the break key (after the initial 60 second ROM Monitor thing), would that indicate there's a problem? I'll be anxiously avoiding the break key until I hear back from ya'll. :-) - Dennis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over frame relay
You might be better of splitting it into 3 areas.I have done something similar before.Let me know and good luck. anthony >From: "mjburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "mjburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: OSPF over frame relay >Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 19:35:05 -0700 > >I was wondering if anyone could help me out. I need to implement OSPF over >frame relay. I have a hub and spoke topology for the frame relay. There >are 3 main hubs each with about 20 sub-interfaces on them (all point to >point). I am looking for the best way to implement OSPF. I was thinking >of >a couple of things. First I could make the hub routers area 0 and then >have >the spokes be a totally stubby area. I was also thinking of dividing the >frame network into 4 sections. Area 0 as my backbone and then 3 areas (one >area at each of the hub sites). Has anyone implemented such a thing? >Thanks in advance for the help. > > > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF over Frame Relay NBMA [7:19577]
I have a 2610 as one peer router and a 3640 as the other peer router. I have a 7206 operating as the "frame relay switch" between them. Layer 2 and Layer 3 are fine because if I use static routes on both peers I can ping across the links. However, I must be setting up OSPF dynamic routing incorrectly. Most examples show OSPF over "point-to-point" frame relay by running OSPF routing processes on all three routers and then putting the appropriate network statements on the central router, however the central router is only a frame-relay switch in my topology without ip addresses on its interfaces. Any ideas would be helpful. John Squeo Technical Specialist Papa John's Corporation (502) 261-4035 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19577&t=19577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF over Frame Relay NBMA [7:19577]
check your ospf network types on both routers ( not the switch ) sh ip ospf interface are you using subinterfaces on the 26 and 36 routers? physical interfaces? mixture? debug ip ospf adjacency is a great tool configurations help Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 7:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF over Frame Relay NBMA [7:19577] I have a 2610 as one peer router and a 3640 as the other peer router. I have a 7206 operating as the "frame relay switch" between them. Layer 2 and Layer 3 are fine because if I use static routes on both peers I can ping across the links. However, I must be setting up OSPF dynamic routing incorrectly. Most examples show OSPF over "point-to-point" frame relay by running OSPF routing processes on all three routers and then putting the appropriate network statements on the central router, however the central router is only a frame-relay switch in my topology without ip addresses on its interfaces. Any ideas would be helpful. John Squeo Technical Specialist Papa John's Corporation (502) 261-4035 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19585&t=19577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over Frame Relay NBMA [7:19577]
If the 7206 is only operating as a frame relay switch, it is irrelevant to your OSPF configuration. Pretend that it doesn't exist. Your OSPF configuration depends on how you've configured your 2610 and 3640. Try configuring them with point-to-point subinterfaces and then configure OSPF as you suggest below. HTH, John >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 9/12/01 8:22:20 AM >>> I have a 2610 as one peer router and a 3640 as the other peer router. I have a 7206 operating as the "frame relay switch" between them. Layer 2 and Layer 3 are fine because if I use static routes on both peers I can ping across the links. However, I must be setting up OSPF dynamic routing incorrectly. Most examples show OSPF over "point-to-point" frame relay by running OSPF routing processes on all three routers and then putting the appropriate network statements on the central router, however the central router is only a frame-relay switch in my topology without ip addresses on its interfaces. Any ideas would be helpful. John Squeo Technical Specialist Papa John's Corporation (502) 261-4035 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19589&t=19577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF over Frame Relay NBMA [7:19577]
If you are doing OSPF and using physical int., then you need map statements with broadcast at the end. If sub int's you don't need map statements but you must have network statements of course and a neighbor statement. You don't need any OSPF config on your frame switch. e-mail me if you want to send configs or anything. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19598&t=19577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over Frame Relay NBMA [7:19577]
The switch has nothing to do with OSPF, send your configs dave "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > I have a 2610 as one peer router and a 3640 as the other peer router. I > have a 7206 operating as the "frame relay switch" between them. Layer 2 > and Layer 3 are fine because if I use static routes on both peers I can > ping across the links. However, I must be setting up OSPF dynamic routing > incorrectly. Most examples show OSPF over "point-to-point" frame relay by > running OSPF routing processes on all three routers and then putting the > appropriate network statements on the central router, however the central > router is only a frame-relay switch in my topology without ip addresses on > its interfaces. Any ideas would be helpful. > > John Squeo > Technical Specialist > Papa John's Corporation > (502) 261-4035 -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19596&t=19577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF over Frame Relay NBMA [7:19577]
I am using physical interfaces not subinterfaces. I am purposely using the physicals instead of doing subs. Here are the two configs: 3640: interface Serial0/0 ip address 1.1.1.6 255.255.255.252 encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes network 1.1.1.4 0.0.0.3 area 0 2610: interface Serial0/0 ip address 1.1.1.10 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation frame-relay no ip mroute-cache router ospf 1 network 1.1.1.8 0.0.0.3 area 0 John Squeo Technical Specialist Papa John's Corporation (502) 261-4035 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19608&t=19577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over Frame Relay NBMA [7:19577]
Assuming your trying to connect the serials you need to put them in the same subnet, try configuring the 2610 with 1.1.1.5 and of coarse the correct OSPF network numbers. I'm not a big inverse arp fan either and add frame-relay maps. Dave "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > I am using physical interfaces not subinterfaces. I am purposely using the > physicals instead of doing subs. Here are the two configs: > > 3640: > interface Serial0/0 > ip address 1.1.1.6 255.255.255.252 > encapsulation frame-relay > no fair-queue > > router ospf 1 > log-adjacency-changes > network 1.1.1.4 0.0.0.3 area 0 > > 2610: > interface Serial0/0 > ip address 1.1.1.10 255.255.255.252 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation frame-relay > no ip mroute-cache > > router ospf 1 > network 1.1.1.8 0.0.0.3 area 0 > > John Squeo > Technical Specialist > Papa John's Corporation > (502) 261-4035 -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19644&t=19577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF over frame relay quick reference document [7:65517]
A byproduct of some recent study. Probably should be classed a work in progress. Hope it helps http://www.chuckslongroad.info/OSPF_Frame_Reference.htm Chuck -- TANSTAAFL "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65517&t=65517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF over frame relay quick reference document [7:65517]
nice layout Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65588&t=65517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map [7:18917]
When you are using frame relay on a physical interface or p2m subintf, Map statement tells the router which PVC/DLCI to use when sending packets to a destination ip address. for example, frame map ip 10.10.10.1 200 frame map ip 20.20.20.1 201 These statements tell the router that to send packets to 10.10.10.1, use the PVC that is configured for DLCI 200. But, To get to 20.20.20.1, this time, send the packet to the PVC that is configured to 201. These statements are there because unlike a true point to point serial interface, you actually have multiple logical connections (PVCs) on this 1 physical interface. Because of this, you need to help the router distinguish which PVC should be used to get to one of the many remote sites. Now when you use a subinterface, what happens is that the router configures a logical interface, under the physical interface that is treated like a point to point serial link. In this type of of situation, you do not need to do any map statements because, in theory, there can be only one remote end router. Compared to when you just use the physical interface and have 5 PVCs terminated on the physical. The only additional thing you have to do on the subintf is that you use the interface dlci xxx command under the p2p subintf to tell it which DLCI this subintf belongs to. If you want to do a comparison, we can use a common telephone. you have 1 phone line coming into the house into 1 phone. Even though you have only 1 phone/phone line(physical serial interface), by utilizing the different phone numbers, you can call many different people because for each diff phone number(DLCI), phone and the phone company will create a logical/virtual connection(PVC) to the other phone... so instead of saying frame map ip 10.10.10.1 200, we have phone map john 555.1212 phone map bill 555.2525, which means, to talk to john on the phone, use the number 555.1212 And later, what you do is just run a single line (p2p subintf) to john's house direct and you run a single phone line to Bill's house direct. In this situation, all you need to do is just mark (intf dlci xxx) somewhere on the phone line which of the phone lines goes to john's and which one goes to Bill's. hope this helped and I did not ramble on stuff that did not make sense. Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18928&t=18917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map [7:18917]
When you are using frame relay on a physical interface or p2m subintf, Map statement tells the router which PVC/DLCI to use when sending packets to a destination ip address. for example, frame map ip 10.10.10.1 200 frame map ip 20.20.20.1 201 These statements tell the router that to send packets to 10.10.10.1, use the PVC that is configured for DLCI 200. But, To get to 20.20.20.1, this time, send the packet to the PVC that is configured to 201. These statements are there because unlike a true point to point serial interface, you actually have multiple logical connections (PVCs) on this 1 physical interface. Because of this, you need to help the router distinguish which PVC should be used to get to one of the many remote sites. Now when you use a subinterface, what happens is that the router configures a logical interface, under the physical interface that is treated like a point to point serial link. In this type of of situation, you do not need to do any map statements because, in theory, there can be only one remote end router. Compared to when you just use the physical interface and have 5 PVCs terminated on the physical. The only additional thing you have to do on the subintf is that you use the interface dlci xxx command under the p2p subintf to tell it which DLCI this subintf belongs to. If you want to do a comparison, we can use a common telephone. you have 1 phone line coming into the house into 1 phone. Even though you have only 1 phone/phone line(physical serial interface), by utilizing the different phone numbers, you can call many different people because for each diff phone number(DLCI), phone and the phone company will create a logical/virtual connection(PVC) to the other phone... so instead of saying frame map ip 10.10.10.1 200, we have phone map john 555.1212 phone map bill 555.2525, which means, to talk to john on the phone, use the number 555.1212 And later, what you do is just run a single line (p2p subintf) to john's house direct and you run a single phone line to Bill's house direct. In this situation, all you need to do is just mark (intf dlci xxx) somewhere on the phone line which of the phone lines goes to john's and which one goes to Bill's. hope this helped and I did not ramble on stuff that did not make sense. Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18927&t=18917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcast [7:18917]
I'm running OSPF over Frame-Relay in a hub and spoke configuration.(CCbootcamp labs) I've set up Router1(hub) to have interface S0.1 (p2p) and interface S0.2(multipoint). For multipoint connections, it's pretty easy because I just input map ip statements. But for my p2p connection, I'm having trouble understanding when I'm supposed to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci" , "frame-relay map ip", or frame-relay map ip broadcast" statements on the hub and spokes. Can anyone help shed some light on this? I've tried using a combination of all 3 types on both the hub and spoke, and every time the hub and spoke are able to ping each other without any problems. -Roger Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18917&t=18917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcast [7:18975]
frame-relay interface-dlci = point-point links frame-relay map ip/ipx/appletalk = multipoint Dave Roger Sohn wrote: > > I'm running OSPF over Frame-Relay in a hub and spoke > configuration.(CCbootcamp labs) I've set up Router1(hub) to have interface > S0.1 (p2p) and interface S0.2(multipoint). For multipoint connections, it's > pretty easy because I just input map ip statements. > > But for my p2p connection, I'm having trouble understanding when I'm > supposed to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci" , "frame-relay map ip", or > frame-relay map ip broadcast" statements on the hub and spokes. Can anyone > help shed some light on this? > > I've tried using a combination of all 3 types on both the hub and spoke, and > every time the hub and spoke are able to ping each other without any > problems. > > -Roger -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18975&t=18975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcast [7:18998]
You are correct on that ptp subinterface links require "frame-relay interface-dlci", but ptm subinterface must have *either* "frame map" or "frame-relay interface-dlci". You can configure either of those on ptm subinterfaces and the other will be resolved dynamically. ""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > frame-relay interface-dlci = point-point links > frame-relay map ip/ipx/appletalk = multipoint > > Dave > > Roger Sohn wrote: > > > > I'm running OSPF over Frame-Relay in a hub and spoke > > configuration.(CCbootcamp labs) I've set up Router1(hub) to have interface > > S0.1 (p2p) and interface S0.2(multipoint). For multipoint connections, > it's > > pretty easy because I just input map ip statements. > > > > But for my p2p connection, I'm having trouble understanding when I'm > > supposed to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci" , "frame-relay map ip", > or > > frame-relay map ip broadcast" statements on the hub and spokes. Can anyone > > help shed some light on this? > > > > I've tried using a combination of all 3 types on both the hub and spoke, > and > > every time the hub and spoke are able to ping each other without any > > problems. > > > > -Roger > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18998&t=18998 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcast [7:19001]
To see any real issues with NBMA networks and OSPF you need a minimum of three FR routers and one FR switch (or router acting as a switch). Generally you use the "frame-relay interface-dlci" command when the router has only one DLCI number (PVC) and you use the frame-relay map ip" command when you have multiple DLCI's numbers. So on a p2p connection use the frame-relay interface-dlci command and on a multipoint or NBMA mode connection use the frame-relay map ip command. There are exceptions to this rule, however this is generally correct. The reason that both work for you now is that you have to have more frame routers inorder to properly test this. If you are using p2multipoint mode then the router should not let you enter the frame-relay interface-dlci command, only the frame-relay map ip command would be allowed. Lance ""Roger Sohn"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm running OSPF over Frame-Relay in a hub and spoke > configuration.(CCbootcamp labs) I've set up Router1(hub) to have interface > S0.1 (p2p) and interface S0.2(multipoint). For multipoint connections, it's > pretty easy because I just input map ip statements. > > But for my p2p connection, I'm having trouble understanding when I'm > supposed to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci" , "frame-relay map ip", or > frame-relay map ip broadcast" statements on the hub and spokes. Can anyone > help shed some light on this? > > I've tried using a combination of all 3 types on both the hub and spoke, and > every time the hub and spoke are able to ping each other without any > problems. > > -Roger Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19001&t=19001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcast [7:19021]
I don't think this is correct. Bellow is a real working config example where there are more than one interface-dlci command on a single p2multipoint interface: interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no keepalive ! interface Serial1.1 multipoint ip address 172.31.0.2 255.255.0.0 ip ospf network point-to-multipoint frame-relay interface-dlci 101 frame-relay interface-dlci 111 frame-relay interface-dlci 121 frame-relay interface-dlci 131 ! Frame-relay map ip statements should only be required if you don't want (or can't) use frame-relay inverse-arp.. Regards, ER - Original Message - From: "Lance" To: Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:55 PM Subject: Re: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcast [7:19001] If you are using p2multipoint mode then the router should not let you enter the frame-relay interface-dlci command, only the frame-relay map ip command would be allowed. Lance ""Roger Sohn"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm running OSPF over Frame-Relay in a hub and spoke > configuration.(CCbootcamp labs) I've set up Router1(hub) to have interface > S0.1 (p2p) and interface S0.2(multipoint). For multipoint connections, it's > pretty easy because I just input map ip statements. > > But for my p2p connection, I'm having trouble understanding when I'm > supposed to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci" , "frame-relay map ip", or > frame-relay map ip broadcast" statements on the hub and spokes. Can anyone > help shed some light on this? > > I've tried using a combination of all 3 types on both the hub and spoke, and > every time the hub and spoke are able to ping each other without any > problems. > > -Roger Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19021&t=19021 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
