Problem with EIGRP [7:65314]
Dear Group, I've a problem with EIGRP and hopefully someone can shed some light. I have a backbone router (bbr1) with two loopback interfaces, (loopback0 172.16.10.100 and loopback1 172.16.11.100), s1 (10.1.1.100/24) which is connected to router p1r1. On bbr1 I have applied the commands: router eigrp 200 network 10.0.0.0 On router p1r1 I have s1 (10.1.1.1/24) connected to bbr1 and I have applied the commands: router eigrp 200 network 192.168.1.0 network 10.0.0.0 When I do "show ip route" on p1r1 I do not see the loopback interfaces from bbr1. According to my book I should have seen in the routing table of p1r1: D EX 172.16.10.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 D EX 172.16.11.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 These routes don't show up and I can't ping them either. If I add the command "network 172.16.0.0" on bbr1, the routes appear in the routing table of p1r1 but without "EX". Is it normal to add a network command for your loopback interfaces? Probably there is something else I'm doing wrong. But what?? Thanks, Lesly Verdier Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65314&t=65314 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314]
Wanting to have this output in routing table of p1r1: D EX 172.16.10.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 D EX 172.16.11.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 You need distribute static (connected) routes 172.16.10.0/24 and 172.16.11.0/24 into EIGRP on router bbr1. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65327&t=65314 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314]
I think you answered your own question it needs to be added to the network command. Daniel Ladrach CCNP, CCNA WorldCom -Original Message- From: Lesly Verdier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314] Dear Group, I've a problem with EIGRP and hopefully someone can shed some light. I have a backbone router (bbr1) with two loopback interfaces, (loopback0 172.16.10.100 and loopback1 172.16.11.100), s1 (10.1.1.100/24) which is connected to router p1r1. On bbr1 I have applied the commands: router eigrp 200 network 10.0.0.0 On router p1r1 I have s1 (10.1.1.1/24) connected to bbr1 and I have applied the commands: router eigrp 200 network 192.168.1.0 network 10.0.0.0 When I do "show ip route" on p1r1 I do not see the loopback interfaces from bbr1. According to my book I should have seen in the routing table of p1r1: D EX 172.16.10.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 D EX 172.16.11.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 These routes don't show up and I can't ping them either. If I add the command "network 172.16.0.0" on bbr1, the routes appear in the routing table of p1r1 but without "EX". Is it normal to add a network command for your loopback interfaces? Probably there is something else I'm doing wrong. But what?? Thanks, Lesly Verdier Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65340&t=65314 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314]
>Dear Group, > >I've a problem with EIGRP and hopefully someone can shed some >light. > >I have a backbone router (bbr1) with two loopback interfaces, >(loopback0 172.16.10.100 and loopback1 172.16.11.100), s1 >(10.1.1.100/24) which is connected to router p1r1. On bbr1 >I have applied the commands: > >router eigrp 200 > network 10.0.0.0 The 'network 10.0.0.0' command causes any interfaces in that network to participate in EIGRP. You have no statement that would cause the 172.16.x.x addresses to participate. From the output below it appears that you expect them to be external routes, which indicates redistribution. On this router, add 'redistribute connected' and a default metric to your EIGRP config. If you wanted them to be internal EIGRP routes you'd add 'network 172.16.0.0' instead of redistributing your connected interfaces into EIGRP. > >On router p1r1 I have s1 (10.1.1.1/24) connected to bbr1 and >I have applied the commands: > >router eigrp 200 > network 192.168.1.0 > network 10.0.0.0 > >When I do "show ip route" on p1r1 I do not see the loopback >interfaces from bbr1. According to my book I should have >seen in the routing table of p1r1: > >D EX 172.16.10.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 >D EX 172.16.11.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 > >These routes don't show up and I can't ping them either. If I >add the command "network 172.16.0.0" on bbr1, the routes appear >in the routing table of p1r1 but without "EX". Is it normal >to add a network command for your loopback interfaces? Probably >there is something else I'm doing wrong. But what?? See above. It comes down to this: EIGRP will only do what you tell it to do. Originally, you hadn't told it to do anything with the 172.16.x.x addresses. You have two options, but it looks like redistribution will produce the results you're looking for. Regards, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65333&t=65314 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314]
Redistribute static and redistribute connected are two separate commands. Both self explanatory. Symon -Original Message- From: tu do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 March 2003 17:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314] Wanting to have this output in routing table of p1r1: D EX 172.16.10.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 D EX 172.16.11.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 You need distribute static (connected) routes 172.16.10.0/24 and 172.16.11.0/24 into EIGRP on router bbr1. = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65405&t=65314 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314]
Redistribute static and redistribute connected are two separate commands. Both self explanatory. Symon -Original Message- From: tu do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 March 2003 17:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314] Wanting to have this output in routing table of p1r1: D EX 172.16.10.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 D EX 172.16.11.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 You need distribute static (connected) routes 172.16.10.0/24 and 172.16.11.0/24 into EIGRP on router bbr1. = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65630&t=65314 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repeated messages, was RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314]
Whoa.. Deja-vu... Anyone else getting lots of repeated messages? -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 March 2003 05:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314] Redistribute static and redistribute connected are two separate commands. Both self explanatory. Symon -Original Message- From: tu do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 March 2003 17:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314] Wanting to have this output in routing table of p1r1: D EX 172.16.10.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 D EX 172.16.11.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 You need distribute static (connected) routes 172.16.10.0/24 and 172.16.11.0/24 into EIGRP on router bbr1. = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = = = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65639&t=65314 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Repeated messages, was RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314]
I seem to get many repeats as well. Just helps me remember better since I read many messages twice. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symon Thurlow Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Repeated messages, was RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314] Whoa.. Deja-vu... Anyone else getting lots of repeated messages? -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 March 2003 05:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314] Redistribute static and redistribute connected are two separate commands. Both self explanatory. Symon -Original Message- From: tu do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 March 2003 17:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314] Wanting to have this output in routing table of p1r1: D EX 172.16.10.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 D EX 172.16.11.0 [170/40537600] via 10.1.1.100, Serial1 You need distribute static (connected) routes 172.16.10.0/24 and 172.16.11.0/24 into EIGRP on router bbr1. = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = = = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65747&t=65314 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
