RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the latest versions. Lots of headaches here. My recommendation: if you have the bucks, go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and reliablity aspect. Lori -Original Message- From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Hi, I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access from a home workstation.. As far as I know my options are: 1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you already have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. Anyone with hints/info/caveats? Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN client... Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20533t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
The better, but more costly choice is the concentrator, you have a lot less issues to worry about than w/ IOS.Either pay now or pay for it later P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III From: Hyde, Lori Reply-To: Hyde, Lori To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400 I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the latest versions. Lots of headaches here. My recommendation: if you have the bucks, go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and reliablity aspect. Lori -Original Message- From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Hi, I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access from a home workstation.. As far as I know my options are: 1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you already have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. Anyone with hints/info/caveats? Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN client... Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20540t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again, possibly should be had) big issues with some ISPs, especially aol and netzero. I have to agree with the other folks, the concentrator (we have 3 vpn-3030 systems deployed around the world) is rock solid - I've only ever had one hang. The cisco VPN hardware solution is a great fit for home offices connecting to the concetrator, and the 806 router also works very well. I've used the client to pix, and while it works fine, it's a real p.i.t.a. Andras -Original Message- From: Neil Borne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] The better, but more costly choice is the concentrator, you have a lot less issues to worry about than w/ IOS.Either pay now or pay for it later P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III From: Hyde, Lori Reply-To: Hyde, Lori To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400 I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the latest versions. Lots of headaches here. My recommendation: if you have the bucks, go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and reliablity aspect. Lori -Original Message- From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Hi, I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access from a home workstation.. As far as I know my options are: 1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you already have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. Anyone with hints/info/caveats? Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN client... Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20550t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
One update: There is a new version of client that does support windows 2000. I haven't seen the problems with any ISPs, but I haven't tried aol or netzero either. :) Good luck! Lori -Original Message- From: Andras Bellak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again, possibly should be had) big issues with some ISPs, especially aol and netzero. I have to agree with the other folks, the concentrator (we have 3 vpn-3030 systems deployed around the world) is rock solid - I've only ever had one hang. The cisco VPN hardware solution is a great fit for home offices connecting to the concetrator, and the 806 router also works very well. I've used the client to pix, and while it works fine, it's a real p.i.t.a. Andras -Original Message- From: Neil Borne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] The better, but more costly choice is the concentrator, you have a lot less issues to worry about than w/ IOS.Either pay now or pay for it later P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III From: Hyde, Lori Reply-To: Hyde, Lori To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400 I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the latest versions. Lots of headaches here. My recommendation: if you have the bucks, go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and reliablity aspect. Lori -Original Message- From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Hi, I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access from a home workstation.. As far as I know my options are: 1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you already have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. Anyone with hints/info/caveats? Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN client... Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20551t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
I am curoius to see what happens when CISCO comes out with the next Unified client later on P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III From: Andras Bellak Reply-To: Andras Bellak To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:15:56 -0400 One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again, possibly should be had) big issues with some ISPs, especially aol and netzero. I have to agree with the other folks, the concentrator (we have 3 vpn-3030 systems deployed around the world) is rock solid - I've only ever had one hang. The cisco VPN hardware solution is a great fit for home offices connecting to the concetrator, and the 806 router also works very well. I've used the client to pix, and while it works fine, it's a real p.i.t.a. Andras -Original Message- From: Neil Borne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] The better, but more costly choice is the concentrator, you have a lot less issues to worry about than w/ IOS.Either pay now or pay for it later P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III From: Hyde, Lori Reply-To: Hyde, Lori To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400 I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the latest versions. Lots of headaches here. My recommendation: if you have the bucks, go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and reliablity aspect. Lori -Original Message- From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Hi, I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access from a home workstation.. As far as I know my options are: 1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you already have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. Anyone with hints/info/caveats? Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN client... Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20554t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
The VPN client FULLY supports Windows 2000 as well as Windows ME, 98, NT, and 95. The unified client is tons better than the old client that Cisco had out. The new Unified client fully supports end user termination into the VPN Concentrators (3000 currently, 5000 series soon) and the PIX 6.0 and up code. The termination to IOS is slated for later this year, I hear. Tim - Original Message - From: Andras Bellak To: Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:15 AM Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again, possibly should be had) big issues with some ISPs, especially aol and netzero. I have to agree with the other folks, the concentrator (we have 3 vpn-3030 systems deployed around the world) is rock solid - I've only ever had one hang. The cisco VPN hardware solution is a great fit for home offices connecting to the concetrator, and the 806 router also works very well. I've used the client to pix, and while it works fine, it's a real p.i.t.a. Andras -Original Message- From: Neil Borne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] The better, but more costly choice is the concentrator, you have a lot less issues to worry about than w/ IOS.Either pay now or pay for it later P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III From: Hyde, Lori Reply-To: Hyde, Lori To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400 I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the latest versions. Lots of headaches here. My recommendation: if you have the bucks, go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and reliablity aspect. Lori -Original Message- From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Hi, I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access from a home workstation.. As far as I know my options are: 1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you already have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. Anyone with hints/info/caveats? Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN client... Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20552t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
Could you tell me where should i put my concentrator in my network? best regards, frank Bob Johnson wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access from a home workstation.. As far as I know my options are: 1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you already have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. Anyone with hints/info/caveats? Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN client... Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20560t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
They also released a Linux version of the client about a month ago. I haven't seen any problems with it yet. Very similar to the Windows client except everything is command line based (what you would expect). Jeff. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim O'Brien Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] The VPN client FULLY supports Windows 2000 as well as Windows ME, 98, NT, and 95. The unified client is tons better than the old client that Cisco had out. The new Unified client fully supports end user termination into the VPN Concentrators (3000 currently, 5000 series soon) and the PIX 6.0 and up code. The termination to IOS is slated for later this year, I hear. Tim - Original Message - From: Andras Bellak To: Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:15 AM Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again, possibly should be had) big issues with some ISPs, especially aol and netzero. I have to agree with the other folks, the concentrator (we have 3 vpn-3030 systems deployed around the world) is rock solid - I've only ever had one hang. The cisco VPN hardware solution is a great fit for home offices connecting to the concetrator, and the 806 router also works very well. I've used the client to pix, and while it works fine, it's a real p.i.t.a. Andras -Original Message- From: Neil Borne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] The better, but more costly choice is the concentrator, you have a lot less issues to worry about than w/ IOS.Either pay now or pay for it later P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III From: Hyde, Lori Reply-To: Hyde, Lori To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400 I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the latest versions. Lots of headaches here. My recommendation: if you have the bucks, go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and reliablity aspect. Lori -Original Message- From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Hi, I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access from a home workstation.. As far as I know my options are: 1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you already have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. Anyone with hints/info/caveats? Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN client... Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20564t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
Has anyone had difficulty running the VPN client on ME. We have had Cisco on phone and in ME the VPN doesnt see the domain for some reason. --- Jeff Chambers wrote: They also released a Linux version of the client about a month ago. I haven't seen any problems with it yet. Very similar to the Windows client except everything is command line based (what you would expect). Jeff. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim O'Brien Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] The VPN client FULLY supports Windows 2000 as well as Windows ME, 98, NT, and 95. The unified client is tons better than the old client that Cisco had out. The new Unified client fully supports end user termination into the VPN Concentrators (3000 currently, 5000 series soon) and the PIX 6.0 and up code. The termination to IOS is slated for later this year, I hear. Tim - Original Message - From: Andras Bellak To: Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:15 AM Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again, possibly should be had) big issues with some ISPs, especially aol and netzero. I have to agree with the other folks, the concentrator (we have 3 vpn-3030 systems deployed around the world) is rock solid - I've only ever had one hang. The cisco VPN hardware solution is a great fit for home offices connecting to the concetrator, and the 806 router also works very well. I've used the client to pix, and while it works fine, it's a real p.i.t.a. Andras -Original Message- From: Neil Borne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] The better, but more costly choice is the concentrator, you have a lot less issues to worry about than w/ IOS.Either pay now or pay for it later P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III From: Hyde, Lori Reply-To: Hyde, Lori To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400 I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the latest versions. Lots of headaches here. My recommendation: if you have the bucks, go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and reliablity aspect. Lori -Original Message- From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Hi, I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access from a home workstation.. As far as I know my options are: 1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you already have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. Anyone with hints/info/caveats? Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN client... Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Spencer Plantier Internet Solutions Engineer Voice 919-949-9993 Cell 919-696-8848 __ Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? Donate cash, emergency relief information http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20566t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
Bob, I have had a couple versions of 3.x on my w2000 machine with no problems at all. Also, I use netzero and it has been good to me so far, 9 months with this client. I would agree that the Concentrator is solid, haven't had to touch it for anything except user management, config. for over a year. From: Andras Bellak Reply-To: Andras Bellak To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:15:56 -0400 One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again, possibly should be had) big issues with some ISPs, especially aol and netzero. I have to agree with the other folks, the concentrator (we have 3 vpn-3030 systems deployed around the world) is rock solid - I've only ever had one hang. The cisco VPN hardware solution is a great fit for home offices connecting to the concetrator, and the 806 router also works very well. I've used the client to pix, and while it works fine, it's a real p.i.t.a. Andras -Original Message- From: Neil Borne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] The better, but more costly choice is the concentrator, you have a lot less issues to worry about than w/ IOS.Either pay now or pay for it later P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III From: Hyde, Lori Reply-To: Hyde, Lori To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400 I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the latest versions. Lots of headaches here. My recommendation: if you have the bucks, go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and reliablity aspect. Lori -Original Message- From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Hi, I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access from a home workstation.. As far as I know my options are: 1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you already have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. Anyone with hints/info/caveats? Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN client... Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20611t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
