RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377]
EIGRP does not recognize 0.0.0.0. Use ip default-network 192.168.1.0 instead, and then put network 192.168.1.0 under your router eigrp config. See Doyle vol. I pp. 756-758 for details. -gt Robert Cluett wrote: I have the following network in my home lab: Internet RouterEisenhowerRooseveltNixonKennedy The Internet Router (192.168.1.1) runs RIP. Eisenhower (E0:192.168.1.100 and S0:172.26.1.9) runs RIP and EIGRP. Roosevelt, Nixon, and Kennedy run EIGRP for the 172.26.1.0,172.26.128.0,192.168.3.0, and 192.168.4.0 networks. I am peforming redistribution of EIGRP into RIP on the internet router which also hosts my LAN of 192.168.1.0). I am unable to propagate the default route out to the rest of the EIGRP routers being Roosevelt, Nixon and Kennedy. Any one have a clue on what I am missing? EISENHOWER CONFIG BELOW router eigrp 1 passive-interface Ethernet0 network 172.26.1.0 0.0.0.255 network 172.26.128.0 0.0.0.255 network 192.168.3.0 network 192.168.4.0 auto-summary eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! router rip version 2 redistribute eigrp 1 metric 0 passive-interface Serial0 passive-interface Serial1 network 192.168.1.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip default-network 0.0.0.0 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52379t=52377 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377]
Try adding: router eigrp 1 redistribute static Lose the ip default-network command -Original Message- From: Robert Cluett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377] I have the following network in my home lab: Internet RouterEisenhowerRooseveltNixonKennedy The Internet Router (192.168.1.1) runs RIP. Eisenhower (E0:192.168.1.100 and S0:172.26.1.9) runs RIP and EIGRP. Roosevelt, Nixon, and Kennedy run EIGRP for the 172.26.1.0,172.26.128.0,192.168.3.0, and 192.168.4.0 networks. I am peforming redistribution of EIGRP into RIP on the internet router which also hosts my LAN of 192.168.1.0). I am unable to propagate the default route out to the rest of the EIGRP routers being Roosevelt, Nixon and Kennedy. Any one have a clue on what I am missing? EISENHOWER CONFIG BELOW router eigrp 1 passive-interface Ethernet0 network 172.26.1.0 0.0.0.255 network 172.26.128.0 0.0.0.255 network 192.168.3.0 network 192.168.4.0 auto-summary eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! router rip version 2 redistribute eigrp 1 metric 0 passive-interface Serial0 passive-interface Serial1 network 192.168.1.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip default-network 0.0.0.0 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52381t=52377 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377]
Ah! redistribute static, and removing the default-network worked! The other option would have forced EIGRP to run on the interface I was running RIP on, and thus would defeat the purpose of what I was trying to do. Only one problem...why cannot I not get to the loopback addresses I have placed on each router and included in the eigrp 1 process as network 172.26.128.0/24? Any ideas? Thanks guys! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52383t=52377 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377]
You don't have all your loopbak addresses in the 172.26.128.0/24 network, do you? If so, create unique subnets for each loopback. -Original Message- From: Robert Cluett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377] Ah! redistribute static, and removing the default-network worked! The other option would have forced EIGRP to run on the interface I was running RIP on, and thus would defeat the purpose of what I was trying to do. Only one problem...why cannot I not get to the loopback addresses I have placed on each router and included in the eigrp 1 process as network 172.26.128.0/24? Any ideas? Thanks guys! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52388t=52377 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377]
oddly enough, they all did fall in the 172.26.128.0/24 network as follows: Eisenhower loop0 is 172.26.128.1 255.255.255.0 Nixon loop0 is 172.26.128.2 255.255.255.0 Kennedy loop0 is 172.26.128.3 255.255.255.0 Roosevelt loop0 is 172.26.128.4 255.255.255.0 Instead, I changed them all to 255.255.255.255 addresses so each host was advertised individually as it's own network and it worked fine. I know this would work in OSPF, but it seems that EIGRP handles it differently. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52402t=52377 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377]
D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/41024000] via 190.10.5.5, 00:00:07, Serial1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52406t=52377 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
