RE: HSRP VLAN Load Balancing [7:56689]

2002-11-01 Thread John McCartney
That is the way I used to do it at the ISP I used to work at...before the
layoffs...We had two 6509's linked together in a full-mesh and used a cfg
similar to what you have. If there is another way. I'd be interested in
finding out about it.

HTH's


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56691&t=56689
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: HSRP VLAN Load Balancing [7:56689]

2002-11-01 Thread Internetwork Geek
Do not add the preempt command to the standby device that you want to loose
the election because they will force an election that they will eventually
loose.

Second add a preempt delay to the device that you want to win the election
after a reload.  This will allow them an opportunity to build there routing
tables and initialize any other services before they take over the active
role.

I also set the device I want to be in standby to a priority of 150 and the
device I want to be active to 200. This give me more room to make changes
the the roles at a later date with more range to work in.  I also chose
numbers above the default priority of 100 on purpose.

Cat1: 

Interface Vlan 5 
ip address 150.50.5.5 255.255.255.0 
standby 1 ip 150.50.5.100 
standby 1 priority 150 
standby 2 ip 150.50.5.200 
standby 2 priority 200 preempt delay 90

Cat2: 

Interface Vlan 5 
ip addres 150.50.5.10 255.255.255.0 
standby 1 ip 150.50.5.100 
standby 1 priority 200 preempt delay 90
standby 2 ip 150.50.5.200 
standby 2 priority 150 


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56704&t=56689
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: HSRP VLAN Load Balancing [7:56689]

2002-11-04 Thread Wes
Dale Kling wrote:
> Is there another way to do this?

Don't know about easier, (haven't had a chance to play with this in the lab
yet) but Cisco has recently announced Gateway Load Balancing Protocol,
(GLBP) for balancing first-hop gateways.

I found a quick white-paper on the topic.  Hope it helps give you a quick
idea about whether it will fill you needs.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/iosw/prodlit/glbpd_ds.htm

--Wes


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56808&t=56689
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]