RE: PIX Question [7:53832]

2002-09-22 Thread McIntosh, Leslie (US - Tulsa)

Tom,
 
Sweet.  Let me know if that does not Solve your issue.  You peaked my
curiosity on this one.
 
 
Thank You,
 
Leslie McIntosh
Sr. Network Engineer
Deloitte & Touche Outsourcing
 

-Original Message- 
From: Tom Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sun 9/22/2002 8:52 PM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: PIX Question [7:53832]



Well... Close.  I was using conduit statements more so than access lists. 
After seeing what you had put down, I think my error was in the global 
statement.  I had... 

global (outside) 1 interface 

Tom 
&i=53875&t=53832 
-- 
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  -
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53893&t=53832
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX Question [7:53832]

2002-09-22 Thread Tom Nielsen

Well... Close.  I was using conduit statements more so than access lists. 
After seeing what you had put down, I think my error was in the global
statement.  I had...

global (outside) 1 interface

Tom


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53875&t=53832
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX Question [7:53832]

2002-09-21 Thread McIntosh, Leslie (US - Tulsa)

Tom,

I am seeing the following:

configure terminal

access-list 101 permit tcp any host x.x.17.34 eq ftp 
access-list 101 permit tcp any host x.x.17.34 eq www
access-list 101 permit tcp any host x.x.17.34 eq smtp 

!PAT for extenal web access
global (outside) 1 x.x.17.34
nat (inside) 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 0 0

!Port redirection for email, ftp, web server
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.17.34 ftp 192.168.x.x ftp netmask
255.255.255.255 0 0
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.17.34 www 192.168.x.x www netmask
255.255.255.255 0 0
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.17.34 smtp 192.168.x.x smtp netmask
255.255.255.255 0 0

!allow external access to email, ftp, web server
access-group 101 in interface outside
exit

Is this similar to what you have?

Are you seeing anything in the Xlate table indicating that the internal
users are at least getting a xlate on the PIX?

I am more familiar with conduit statements, but the ACL's are the same.

 

I think I would take this back to PAT if there are still issues.  Prove PAT
then add statements to see what is killing the connections.

Les

 -Original Message- 
From: Tom Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sun 9/22/2002 12:11 AM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: PIX Question [7:53832]



I saw that in my search for the answer.  When I try to implement it, the 
only device that is able to get on the internet is the device hosting the 
website/email.  All other workstation could resolve the internet websites 
but could not browse. 

Tom 
&i=53841&t=53832 
-- 
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  -
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53843&t=53832
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX Question [7:53832]

2002-09-21 Thread Tom Nielsen

I saw that in my search for the answer.  When I try to implement it, the
only device that is able to get on the internet is the device hosting the
website/email.  All other workstation could resolve the internet websites
but could not browse.

Tom


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53841&t=53832
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX Question [7:53832]

2002-09-21 Thread McIntosh, Leslie (US - Tulsa)

Tom,
 
Having just passed my CSPFA and MCNS exams in the last month, I thought I
was pretty on top or the PIX thing Then you ask about Port Redirection,
so my curiosity is peaked and I had to do some Cisco.com surfing.  I found a
Link that deals specifically with NAT and port redirection:
 
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/28.html
 
 
I do not think I covered a single chapter/question about port Redirection on
my exams/study guide (Cisco Press).
 
Check out the link, it looks pretty cool!  Now I am going to have to get a
501 and try that at the house!
 
Thank You,
 
Leslie McIntosh
Sr. Network Engineer
Deloitte & Touche Outsourcing
CCNA, CNE5, Network+, A+ - Working on CSS1 (3 of 4) 

-Original Message- 
From: Tom Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sat 9/21/2002 8:01 PM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Subject: PIX Question [7:53832]



Basic configuration issue. 

I have a very simple configuration.  I have a PIX Firewall with 2 Interfaces

(Inside,outside).  I have an internal network, 192.168.0.0/16.  The outside 
interface is x.x.17.35 - I have one additional IP Address x.x.17.34 that 
everyone has to nat out.  The address (.34) also will handle all incoming 
mail, web and FTP requests and redirect it to a server in the 192.168.0.0/16

network.  I am confused on the the Static, global and NAT commands for this 
configuration... any help would be appreciated. 

tom 
&i=53832&t=53832 
-- 
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  -
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53837&t=53832
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]