Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
Thy the following command: Under Router eigrp (AS#) no auto-summary maximum-paths 2 See if you now have multiple routes to the same destination in you route table. Eric CCNP --- John Neiberger wrote: I don't really have an answer, this is more of a me too email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John Cisco Nuts 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34062t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
I don't really have an answer, this is more of a me too email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John Cisco Nuts 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33856t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
I'm not going to attempt to explain the mathmatics but the last time I needed to use variance, get EIGRP to loadshare over a T1 and T3 a variance of 2 worked perfectly. Dave John Neiberger wrote: I don't really have an answer, this is more of a me too email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John Cisco Nuts 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33863t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
Even with the variance command a neighbor might not be considered a feasible successor. Remember a feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is less than the feasible distance. This is a loop prevention method in EIGRP. Read the section, Deciding if a Path is Loop-Free in the document at the link below http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp1.html#6 I guarantee a light bulb will come on above your head after you read this. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835] I don't really have an answer, this is more of a me too email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John Cisco Nuts 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33861t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
OT, I placed an order for ccna with cheet-sheets and those guys never return my emails. Does anybody know if they are up and still working. -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835] I'm not going to attempt to explain the mathmatics but the last time I needed to use variance, get EIGRP to loadshare over a T1 and T3 a variance of 2 worked perfectly. Dave John Neiberger wrote: I don't really have an answer, this is more of a me too email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John Cisco Nuts 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33876t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
I think this was the exact issue that I was running into. Given this information, it seems that this decreases the usefulness of the variance command greatly. I'll try to draw the my scenario in text: [A] / \ / \ [B] [C] \ / \ / [D] | | [E] Let's start out with a metric of 10 on each link. At Router A, it sees two paths to network E, each with a metric of 30. Now let's make set the C-D metric to 20. Router A will now pick the path through B because of the lower metric (30). Since the advertised distance from C is also 30--not greater than the FD--then it becomes a feasible successor. In this case, addind the variance command would have an effect. Now, make the C-D metric 30. Router A will install the route through B with a metric of 30. However, since the advertised distance from C (40) is now greater than the FD, router C will not be entered into the EIGRP topology table as a feasible successor. In this situation, variance would have no relevance because we only have a single feasible successor in the table. Is that basically it? Thanks! John Jim Brown 1/31/02 8:24:00 AM Even with the variance command a neighbor might not be considered a feasible successor. Remember a feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is less than the feasible distance. This is a loop prevention method in EIGRP. Read the section, Deciding if a Path is Loop-Free in the document at the link below http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp1.html#6 I guarantee a light bulb will come on above your head after you read this. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835] I don't really have an answer, this is more of a me too email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John Cisco Nuts 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33892t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
So based on your experience, if I set the bandwidth on one route to 45mb and leave the other as the default, variance of 2 will work, right? I'll try that and let you know. Thanks! From: MADMAN Reply-To: MADMAN To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835] Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:14:46 -0500 I'm not going to attempt to explain the mathmatics but the last time I needed to use variance, get EIGRP to loadshare over a T1 and T3 a variance of 2 worked perfectly. Dave John Neiberger wrote: I don't really have an answer, this is more of a me too email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John Cisco Nuts 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33919t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
hmm, I'll be interested to see what happens. In case your wondering why in the world, it was a channelized T3 so the link was really another parallel T1 but to EIGRP the interface was 45M. Dave Cisco Nuts wrote: So based on your experience, if I set the bandwidth on one route to 45mb and leave the other as the default, variance of 2 will work, right? I'll try that and let you know. Thanks! From: MADMAN Reply-To: MADMAN To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835] Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:14:46 -0500 I'm not going to attempt to explain the mathmatics but the last time I needed to use variance, get EIGRP to loadshare over a T1 and T3 a variance of 2 worked perfectly. Dave John Neiberger wrote: I don't really have an answer, this is more of a me too email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John Cisco Nuts 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33935t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
I think this was the exact issue that I was running into. Given this information, it seems that this decreases the usefulness of the variance command greatly. I'll try to draw the my scenario in text: [A] / \ / \ [B] [C] \ / \ / [D] | | [E] Let's start out with a metric of 10 on each link. At Router A, it sees two paths to network E, each with a metric of 30. Now let's make set the C-D metric to 20. Router A will now pick the path through B because of the lower metric (30). Since the advertised distance from C is also 30--not greater than the FD--then it becomes a feasible successor. In this case, addind the variance command would have an effect. Now, make the C-D metric 30. Router A will install the route through B with a metric of 30. However, since the advertised distance from C (40) is now greater than the FD, router C will not be entered into the EIGRP topology table as a feasible successor. In this situation, variance would have no relevance because we only have a single feasible successor in the table. Is that basically it? Thanks! John Jim Brown 1/31/02 8:24:00 AM Even with the variance command a neighbor might not be considered a feasible successor. Remember a feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is less than the feasible distance. This is a loop prevention method in EIGRP. Read the section, Deciding if a Path is Loop-Free in the document at the link below http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp1.html#6 I guarantee a light bulb will come on above your head after you read this. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835] I don't really have an answer, this is more of a me too email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John Cisco Nuts 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33984t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
