RE: content based switching?? [7:40990]
Hi Thangavel, agreed, but Mohammad is looking for a cheap solution. If he uses VLAN interfaces to put the servers on, e.g. each server on a different VLAN, policy routing will still work fine. The problem with the processing overhead remains...;) Regards, Georg >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: "Georg Pauwen" >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: content based switching?? [7:40990] >Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:23:42 +0100 > > >Hi, > >Just to add some more info , policy routing cannot dominate the entire path >from source to destination.It can only influence the path upto the next >hop.And also it is not advisable to enable policy routing on the core >networking devices as they add more processing ovehead. > >Kind Regards /Thangavel > >186K >Reading,Brkshire >Direct No -0118 9064259 >Mobile No -07796292416 >Post code: RG16LH >www.186k.co.uk > >-- >The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, > but in rising every time we fall ." > -- Nelson Mandela > > > > > > "Georg > Pauwen" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > il.com> Fax to: > Sent by: Subject: RE: content based >switching?? [7:40990] > nobody@groups > tudy.com > > > 10/04/2002 > 11:07 > Please > respond to > "Georg > Pauwen" > > > > > > >Hi Muhammad, > >I would say that policy routing is probably your cheapest way to go. With >policy routing, you can define which traffic goes to which destination. I >am >not sure how familiar you are with policy routing, but have a look at the >following link: > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/protocol/tech/plicy_wp.htm > >If you have specific questions about the syntax, just reply to this post. > >Regards, > >Georg >** >This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the >addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential >or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or >the person responsible for delivering the message to the named >addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The >contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies >taken. >186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England >& Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street >London SW1Y 4UR >** > _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41016&t=40990 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: content based switching?? [7:40990]
Hi, Just to add some more info , policy routing cannot dominate the entire path from source to destination.It can only influence the path upto the next hop.And also it is not advisable to enable policy routing on the core networking devices as they add more processing ovehead. Kind Regards /Thangavel 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall ." -- Nelson Mandela "Georg Pauwen" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax to: Sent by: Subject: RE: content based switching?? [7:40990] nobody@groups tudy.com 10/04/2002 11:07 Please respond to "Georg Pauwen" Hi Muhammad, I would say that policy routing is probably your cheapest way to go. With policy routing, you can define which traffic goes to which destination. I am not sure how familiar you are with policy routing, but have a look at the following link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/protocol/tech/plicy_wp.htm If you have specific questions about the syntax, just reply to this post. Regards, Georg ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England & Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41015&t=40990 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: content based switching?? [7:40990]
Hi Muhammad, I would say that policy routing is probably your cheapest way to go. With policy routing, you can define which traffic goes to which destination. I am not sure how familiar you are with policy routing, but have a look at the following link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/protocol/tech/plicy_wp.htm If you have specific questions about the syntax, just reply to this post. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41014&t=40990 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
