Re: Cisco 2524 Vs AGS+
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Circusnuts wrote: > > > But I did extensive searching on CCO last night, > > including the entire 10.x and 11.x release notes and found nothing that > > indicates that frame switching is a feature/command in the AGS+. > > Frame switching, from what I could see, was first introduced, into a > > limited set of platforms in 11.2. > > > > Brian Phil, thanks for clarifying, I am glad it can be used as such, a great box > > Here's the AGS config I used in the CCIE Bootcamp's labs... > > Current configuration: > ! > version 11.0 > service udp-small-servers > service tcp-small-servers > ! > hostname r7 > ! > ! > no ip domain-lookup > frame-relay switching > ! > > Good Luck !!! > Phil > --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2524 Vs AGS+
> But I did extensive searching on CCO last night, > including the entire 10.x and 11.x release notes and found nothing that > indicates that frame switching is a feature/command in the AGS+. > Frame switching, from what I could see, was first introduced, into a > limited set of platforms in 11.2. > > Brian Here's the AGS config I used in the CCIE Bootcamp's labs... Current configuration: ! version 11.0 service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname r7 ! ! no ip domain-lookup frame-relay switching ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.70.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Ethernet1 ip address 192.168.17.2 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 503 interface Serial2 305 frame-relay route 504 interface Serial3 405 frame-relay route 506 interface Serial1 605 ! interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 605 interface Serial0 506 ! interface Serial2 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 200 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 305 interface Serial0 503 ! interface Serial3 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 405 interface Serial0 504 ! interface Serial4 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial5 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial6 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial7 no ip address shutdown ! router eigrp 1 redistribute rip metric 1 100 255 1 1500 passive-interface Ethernet0 network 192.168.17.0 ! router rip passive-interface Ethernet1 network 192.168.70.0 ! no logging console ! alias exec i show ip route alias exec ci clear ip route * ! line con 0 line aux 0 transport input all line vty 0 4 login ! end r7#i Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate default Gateway of last resort is 192.168.17.1 to network 0.0.0.0 172.168.0.0 is variably subnetted, 8 subnets, 2 masks D EX172.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 [170/2221056] via 192.168.17.1, 00:00:51, Ethernet1 D EX172.168.40.0 255.255.255.0 [170/2221056] via 192.168.17.1, 00:00:52, Ethernet1 D EX172.168.60.0 255.255.255.0 [170/2221056] via 192.168.17.1, 00:00:52, Ethernet1 D EX172.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 [170/2221056] via 192.168.17.1, 00:00:52, Ethernet1 D EX172.168.100.3 255.255.255.255 [170/2221056] via 192.168.17.1, 00:00:52, Ethernet1 D EX172.168.100.5 255.255.255.255 [170/2221056] via 192.168.17.1, 00:00:52, Ethernet1 D EX172.168.100.6 255.255.255.255 [170/2221056] via 192.168.17.1, 00:00:52, Ethernet1 D EX172.168.200.0 255.255.255.0 [170/2221056] via 192.168.17.1, 00:00:52, Ethernet1 C192.168.70.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0 C192.168.17.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1 D192.168.21.0 [90/2195456] via 192.168.17.1, 00:00:54, Ethernet1 137.20.0.0 255.255.255.0 is subnetted, 1 subnets D EX137.20.20.0 [170/2221056] via 192.168.17.1, 00:00:54, Ethernet1 D*EX 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [170/2221056] via 192.168.17.1, 00:00:54, Ethernet1 r7# Good Luck !!! Phil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2524 Vs AGS+
The AGS is perfect for in Frame-Switch role. For the money, you can't beat it. If you ever get a chance to check out CCIE Bootcamps, they use this router in their dial-in lab racks. 10.0 & up supports DLSW, Frame-Relay Switching, & X.25. This router is best is a lab setting, when used as a Telco cloud. If you have any further questions, contact me offline. I don't fuss with AGS's much anymore, but configuring & building them is how I got into the business... Phil - Original Message - From: "Ashfaq Aslam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CiscoStudyGroup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 6:33 PM Subject: Cisco 2524 Vs AGS+ > Hiya all, > > I am currently preparing equipment for the CCIE lab at home. I was > wondering if it's better to purchase AGS+ or Cisco 2524 Router for > additional Serial interfaces. > > Does AGS+ have the same functionality as a router in terms of Routing > traffic, or is it just a big box with loads of serials interfaces which just > forwards traffic like a bridge? > > Any feedback will be appreciated. > > Have a great day. > > Ashfaq > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2524 Vs AGS+
The AGS+ works fine as a frame switch. We used to have a couple in our remote racks. Marc Russell CCIE Boot Camp www.ccbootcamp.com "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Ashfaq Aslam wrote: > > > Hiya all, > > > > I am currently preparing equipment for the CCIE lab at home. I was > > wondering if it's better to purchase AGS+ or Cisco 2524 Router for > > additional Serial interfaces. > > > > Does AGS+ have the same functionality as a router in terms of Routing > > traffic, or is it just a big box with loads of serials interfaces which just > > forwards traffic like a bridge? > > > > Any feedback will be appreciated. > > AGS+ is a router. They are cheap. They can goto IOS 11.0 with a > CSC/4. I would get one of these myself if I knew it could do > frame-switching. But I did extensive searching on CCO last night, > including the entire 10.x and 11.x release notes and found nothing that > indicates that frame switching is a feature/command in the AGS+. > > Frame switching, from what I could see, was first introduced, into a > limited set of platforms in 11.2. > > Brian > > > > > > Have a great day. > > > > Ashfaq > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --- > Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Network Administrator > ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2524 Vs AGS+
>>I think they would make good frame switches if those cables... are cheap.<< Ah, but there's the rub - The AGS+ only cost me about $500. I bought 4 DCE-DTE cables to connect to my other Cisco 2500's at $48 apiece plus shipping. The cables cost me half as much as the AGS+. But, for $750, I got not only a device capable of being a frame switch, it also is a router with LOTS of serial ports! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2524 Vs AGS+
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Ashfaq Aslam wrote: > Hiya all, > > I am currently preparing equipment for the CCIE lab at home. I was > wondering if it's better to purchase AGS+ or Cisco 2524 Router for > additional Serial interfaces. > > Does AGS+ have the same functionality as a router in terms of Routing > traffic, or is it just a big box with loads of serials interfaces which just > forwards traffic like a bridge? > > Any feedback will be appreciated. AGS+ is a router. They are cheap. They can goto IOS 11.0 with a CSC/4. I would get one of these myself if I knew it could do frame-switching. But I did extensive searching on CCO last night, including the entire 10.x and 11.x release notes and found nothing that indicates that frame switching is a feature/command in the AGS+. Frame switching, from what I could see, was first introduced, into a limited set of platforms in 11.2. Brian > > Have a great day. > > Ashfaq > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
