RE: Collapsed Backbone [7:41418]

2002-04-15 Thread Ismail Al-Shelh

First of all thanks to Tom , Georg ,Howard and every body.

To be honest me too is surprising with these terms,  anyhow these terms
simplify how to remember the scenarios and all the staff  arround, I do not
know the essential reason with giving  such a  name but i think collapsed
backbone has given this name because the network   confined with one
building,  there is only one switch block ! as the core and distribution
layer combined in one device.

If I am wrong then please correct me.

 

-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Collapsed Backbone [7:41418]


First, I wonder who comes up with these terms?  Collapsed backbone 
sounds like something that needs the immediate attention of an 
orthopedist or chiropractor, while router on a stick sounds like 
something from the Autobiography of Vlad the Impaler.


At 3:49 AM -0400 4/14/02, Georg Pauwen wrote:
Hi Ismail,

here is what I found on CCO:

%A collapsed backbone has high-bandwidth uplinks from all segments and
subnetworks to a single device, such as a Gigabit switch, which serves as a
  ^^^
First key point. The backbone or core device is defined by topology 
rather than product line.  That point being made, it is true that 
Cisco does position products for access, distribution, and core 
applications generally based on the requirements of large 
enterprises.  But a core switch could be quite slow and small, if 
everything else in the network is small and slow, yet still be a 
reasonable design approach.

single point for monitoring and controlling the network%.

Second point: as defined, it's also a single point of failure.  With 
a campus network large enough to justify a gigabit switch in a core, 
this is a bad idea. It's usually better to plan on at least two 
physical switches that normally loadshare (e.g., switch 1 is the 
primary for odd-numbered VLANs and switch 2 is the primary for 
even-numbered), but either can take over the entire load.


The following link contains a figure detailing the collapsed backbone
design
using a Cat4908G-L3:

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/sc/swgo
ver.htm

Regards,

Georg

-- 
What Problem are you trying to solve?
***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not 
directly to me***


Howard C. Berkowitz  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications
http://www.gettlabs.com
Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com
retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41466t=41418
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Collapsed Backbone [7:41418]

2002-04-14 Thread Georg Pauwen

Hi Ismail,

here is what I found on CCO:

´A collapsed backbone has high-bandwidth uplinks from all segments and
subnetworks to a single device, such as a Gigabit switch, which serves as a
single point for monitoring and controlling the network´.

The following link contains a figure detailing the collapsed backbone design
using a Cat4908G-L3:

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/sc/swgover.htm

Regards,

Georg


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41419t=41418
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Collapsed Backbone [7:41418]

2002-04-14 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

First, I wonder who comes up with these terms?  Collapsed backbone 
sounds like something that needs the immediate attention of an 
orthopedist or chiropractor, while router on a stick sounds like 
something from the Autobiography of Vlad the Impaler.


At 3:49 AM -0400 4/14/02, Georg Pauwen wrote:
Hi Ismail,

here is what I found on CCO:

%A collapsed backbone has high-bandwidth uplinks from all segments and
subnetworks to a single device, such as a Gigabit switch, which serves as a
  ^^^
First key point. The backbone or core device is defined by topology 
rather than product line.  That point being made, it is true that 
Cisco does position products for access, distribution, and core 
applications generally based on the requirements of large 
enterprises.  But a core switch could be quite slow and small, if 
everything else in the network is small and slow, yet still be a 
reasonable design approach.

single point for monitoring and controlling the network%.

Second point: as defined, it's also a single point of failure.  With 
a campus network large enough to justify a gigabit switch in a core, 
this is a bad idea. It's usually better to plan on at least two 
physical switches that normally loadshare (e.g., switch 1 is the 
primary for odd-numbered VLANs and switch 2 is the primary for 
even-numbered), but either can take over the entire load.


The following link contains a figure detailing the collapsed backbone design
using a Cat4908G-L3:

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/sc/swgover.htm

Regards,

Georg

-- 
What Problem are you trying to solve?
***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not 
directly to me***

Howard C. Berkowitz  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com
Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com
retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41427t=41418
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Collapsed Backbone [7:41418]

2002-04-14 Thread Tom Scott

Georg Pauwen wrote:

 4A collapsed backbone has high-bandwidth uplinks from all segments and
 subnetworks to a single device, such as a Gigabit switch, which serves as a
 single point for monitoring and controlling the network4.

 The following link contains a figure detailing the collapsed backbone
design
 using a Cat4908G-L3:


http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/sc/swgover.htm

Another way to look at collapsed backbones is to consider why it's called
collapsed.
Cisco uses a hierarchical campus model that scales down to small one-room
networks and
up to enterprise-wide networks that include multiple buildings. The full
model has
three tiers or layers (access, distribution, core) and multiple types of
building
blocks (switch block, core block, server block, mainframe block, WAN block).
I don't
have statistics but I've seen a lot more collapsed networks than networks
that fit the
full 3-tiered multi-block multi-building campus model.

The collapsed model is very popular and can scale up to hundreds of
endsystems and
dozens of workgroups (VLANs). All you need is a high-end switch, gigabit
cabling
(preferably fiber but cat 5e/6 works just fine if you keep the cable lengths
in the 90m
range and if you don't have EMI to worry about), and a high-end router to
serve as a
firewall and gateway to the outside. Some of the endsystems can be home-run
directly
back to the main switch, or they can be aggregated at active or passive
consolidation
points. The router can be a standalone or can be included in the same
chassis as the
main switch such as a route service module or layer 3 services module.

Cheers,
-- TT




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41422t=41418
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]