Re: Difference between Rendezvous Point ,Designated Router

2001-03-03 Thread Bradley J. Wilson

The rendezvous point is an element in a multicasting environment - can't
recall which protocol off the top of my head, it's probably either PIM-DM
or -SM.

The designated router is an element of OSPF on a broadcast network
(ethernet, token ring, etc.).  The other routers on the network form their
adjacencies with the DR, and the DR makes sure that every router on the
broadcast network have the same LSDB.

BJ

- Original Message -
From: rtc
To: Cisco ; CISCO GROUPSTUDY
Cc: Cisco ; CISCO GROUPSTUDY
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 4:48 PM
Subject: Difference between Rendezvous Point ,Designated Router


  what is the Difference between Rendezvous Point and Designated Router?

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Difference between Rendezvous Point ,Designated Router

2001-03-03 Thread Bradley J. Wilson

Er...duh, the DR in a multicast environment.  Sorry, brain lock there.

The DR is again an element on a broadcast network.  The DR acts as the
"manager" for that broadcast network if and when it is the upstream network
from another router.  The downstream router sends its join/leave requests to
the DR, regardless of the multicast group it is joining or leaving.  This
streamlines things from the downstream router's perspective, since it only
needs to interact with one other router across this broadcast network.  But
the DR may not be the direct path to the source of the multicast stream, so
the DR might have to forward the request to the correct upstream router
across the same network.

I'm getting my info from Maufer's "Deploying IP Multicast in the
Enterprise" - which isn't Cisco-specific.  Maybe someone else could post
quotes from the Cisco Press books or CCO about the difference.

BJ


- Original Message -
From: Bradley J. Wilson
To: cisco
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between Rendezvous Point ,Designated Router


The rendezvous point is an element in a multicasting environment - can't
recall which protocol off the top of my head, it's probably either PIM-DM
or -SM.

The designated router is an element of OSPF on a broadcast network
(ethernet, token ring, etc.).  The other routers on the network form their
adjacencies with the DR, and the DR makes sure that every router on the
broadcast network have the same LSDB.

BJ

- Original Message -
From: rtc
To: Cisco ; CISCO GROUPSTUDY
Cc: Cisco ; CISCO GROUPSTUDY
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 4:48 PM
Subject: Difference between Rendezvous Point ,Designated Router


  what is the Difference between Rendezvous Point and Designated Router?

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Difference between Rendezvous Point ,Designated Router

2001-03-03 Thread Kane, Christopher A.

RTC,

I'm studying for my BCMSN right now (test Monday). Coming from an ISP
background (high end routers), I'm not used to this "Campus Network" type
stuff. I'm reading Karen Webb's Cisco Press book. She mentions DRs in the
Multicast section. She states that DRs are elected on Multi-access Segments
for both PIM-SM and PIM-DM configurations. She doesn't explain it real
deeply (not like you see explanations for the DR/BDR setup of OSPF). But she
does say that the routers that are PIM enabled elect the router with the
Highest IP address as the DR for the network. In this scenario the DR is
responsible for sending out the IGMP query messages. And similar to OSPF,
you don't need a DR on point-to-point links. 

The Rendezvous Point is needed when you configure a router with PIM
sparse-mode. Unlike the DR that's used regardless of PIM-SM or PIM-DM.

I'm starting to get the feeling that the Rendezvous Point is more important
when the hosts that are part of the multicast group are widely spread out
through the network.

I'd really like to hear from someone experienced with Multicast, my exposure
to it is all book-based. This will be the weakest part of my CCNP.

Chris


-Original Message-
From: rtc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 4:48 PM
To: Cisco; CISCO GROUPSTUDY
Cc: Cisco; CISCO GROUPSTUDY
Subject: Difference between Rendezvous Point ,Designated Router


  what is the Difference between Rendezvous Point and Designated Router?

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Difference between Rendezvous Point ,Designated Router

2001-03-03 Thread username

Assuming you are talking about PIM-SM , then  where you have two routers (PIM-SM)
connected to a shared network with a receiver,  a single DR should be chosen  for the
purpose of sending "joins" to the RP in order to build the share tree for that group.
If both routers sent joins to the RP for the group you would have duplicate paths and
the host/reciever would receive duplicate multicast traffic.

PIM-SM is centered on a single, unidirectional shared tree.  The root of the tree is 
the
RP.  In a shared tree, sources must send the multicast traffic to the root (RP) for the
traffic to reach all receivers.

Here is two sites for your reading pleasure.  Also the Cisco Press book by Beu 
Willamson
is pretty good.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/multicast/index.html
ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/ipmulticast.html

"Bradley J. Wilson" wrote:

> Er...duh, the DR in a multicast environment.  Sorry, brain lock there.
>
> The DR is again an element on a broadcast network.  The DR acts as the
> "manager" for that broadcast network if and when it is the upstream network
> from another router.  The downstream router sends its join/leave requests to
> the DR, regardless of the multicast group it is joining or leaving.  This
> streamlines things from the downstream router's perspective, since it only
> needs to interact with one other router across this broadcast network.  But
> the DR may not be the direct path to the source of the multicast stream, so
> the DR might have to forward the request to the correct upstream router
> across the same network.
>
> I'm getting my info from Maufer's "Deploying IP Multicast in the
> Enterprise" - which isn't Cisco-specific.  Maybe someone else could post
> quotes from the Cisco Press books or CCO about the difference.
>
> BJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bradley J. Wilson
> To: cisco
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 5:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Difference between Rendezvous Point ,Designated Router
>
> The rendezvous point is an element in a multicasting environment - can't
> recall which protocol off the top of my head, it's probably either PIM-DM
> or -SM.
>
> The designated router is an element of OSPF on a broadcast network
> (ethernet, token ring, etc.).  The other routers on the network form their
> adjacencies with the DR, and the DR makes sure that every router on the
> broadcast network have the same LSDB.
>
> BJ
>
> - Original Message -
> From: rtc
> To: Cisco ; CISCO GROUPSTUDY
> Cc: Cisco ; CISCO GROUPSTUDY
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 4:48 PM
> Subject: Difference between Rendezvous Point ,Designated Router
>
>   what is the Difference between Rendezvous Point and Designated Router?
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]