After further investigation, I believe I have found the answer. However, I
would like to run it by you all. The routers in question did not have the
command redistribut static configured on them. If I understand the meaning
of this command, it is used to inject the static routes configured on a
router for redistribution into the routing protocol in question; in this
case EIGRP. Sound right? Thanks.
Robert Edmonds wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I noticed today that between several of my routers, routes that were
statically assigned did not get sent in the routing updates to neighboring
routers running EIGRP. So, I removed the static routes on several of them
to one subnet in particular, and when the router closest to the subnet in
question learned the route from the router on that subnet, the other
routers
in the network picked the route up immediately. Do static routes not get
propogated, or is there something in my configuration that is causing this
behavior? I was not aware of this behavior until today. Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54182t=54164
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
