Re: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325]
Hi ISL is cisco stuff ..if ur network is all cisco you can use ISL in that but if it involves other switches or in near future u see this thing use Dot.1Q.This is for the equipment ..and for the performance thing which one is better i thing somebody more experienced can help u on this . regards Arun Sharma Sammi wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm not clear on which standard I should use for VLAN setup. I will be using a 2948G-L3 as a core switch. Connected to the core will be a number of 2948xl as access switches. The majority of these access ports will connect directly to end stations, though some will connect to other 2948s (via fiber and via wireless) which then will connect to end stations. Does this last fact mean I must use ISL so as to implement trunking? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13342t=13325 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325]
The switches you have support both ISL and Dot1Q if you are running the enterprise code, not sure for the standard stuff. For a sample config: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html Hope that helps. Arun wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi ISL is cisco stuff ..if ur network is all cisco you can use ISL in that but if it involves other switches or in near future u see this thing use Dot.1Q.This is for the equipment ..and for the performance thing which one is better i thing somebody more experienced can help u on this . regards Arun Sharma Sammi wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm not clear on which standard I should use for VLAN setup. I will be using a 2948G-L3 as a core switch. Connected to the core will be a number of 2948xl as access switches. The majority of these access ports will connect directly to end stations, though some will connect to other 2948s (via fiber and via wireless) which then will connect to end stations. Does this last fact mean I must use ISL so as to implement trunking? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13417t=13325 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325]
Thanks for the config sample, and thank you all for the input. I'm drawn to 802.1Q, although I can't really give exact reasons. During the transition I will have a few 1900 and a couple of 2800 switches in the network and it seems I'll have less trouble with the 802.1Q. On 23 Jul 2001 15:39:43 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Horley) wrote: The switches you have support both ISL and Dot1Q if you are running the enterprise code, not sure for the standard stuff. For a sample config: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html Hope that helps. Arun wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi ISL is cisco stuff ..if ur network is all cisco you can use ISL in that but if it involves other switches or in near future u see this thing use Dot.1Q.This is for the equipment ..and for the performance thing which one is better i thing somebody more experienced can help u on this . regards Arun Sharma Sammi wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm not clear on which standard I should use for VLAN setup. I will be using a 2948G-L3 as a core switch. Connected to the core will be a number of 2948xl as access switches. The majority of these access ports will connect directly to end stations, though some will connect to other 2948s (via fiber and via wireless) which then will connect to end stations. Does this last fact mean I must use ISL so as to implement trunking? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13446t=13325 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325]
At 09:53 PM 7/23/01, Sammi wrote: Thanks for the config sample, and thank you all for the input. I'm drawn to 802.1Q, although I can't really give exact reasons. During the transition I will have a few 1900 I don't think the 1900s support 802.1q!? That will be your first problem. Priscilla and a couple of 2800 switches in the network and it seems I'll have less trouble with the 802.1Q. On 23 Jul 2001 15:39:43 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Horley) wrote: The switches you have support both ISL and Dot1Q if you are running the enterprise code, not sure for the standard stuff. For a sample config: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html Hope that helps. Arun wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi ISL is cisco stuff ..if ur network is all cisco you can use ISL in that but if it involves other switches or in near future u see this thing use Dot.1Q.This is for the equipment ..and for the performance thing which one is better i thing somebody more experienced can help u on this . regards Arun Sharma Sammi wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm not clear on which standard I should use for VLAN setup. I will be using a 2948G-L3 as a core switch. Connected to the core will be a number of 2948xl as access switches. The majority of these access ports will connect directly to end stations, though some will connect to other 2948s (via fiber and via wireless) which then will connect to end stations. Does this last fact mean I must use ISL so as to implement trunking? Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13447t=13325 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325]
On 23 Jul 2001 22:16:17 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Priscilla Oppenheimer) wrote: At 09:53 PM 7/23/01, Sammi wrote: Thanks for the config sample, and thank you all for the input. I'm drawn to 802.1Q, although I can't really give exact reasons. During the transition I will have a few 1900 I don't think the 1900s support 802.1q!? That will be your first problem. I love this work ;-) Thanks for the heads up. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13448t=13325 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
