Router/Switch naming standards

2001-04-06 Thread LeBrun, Tim

Group,
I am curious to know the opinions on what are some of the better
naming standards used to name routers/switches?  I have heard of several
(using local airport codes being the most common, i.e. PDX001(Portland) or
ATL001(Atlanta)).  And then of course incrementing the number each time you
add a router/switch.  Any suggestions?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Router/Switch naming standards

2001-04-06 Thread EA Louie

I think that's one of the subjects that Priscilla covers in her Top-down
Network Design book

some of the better "rules" are
 avoid using special characters (hypens, underscores) (I break that rule all
the time because I love using hyphens!)
 if you can, identify the type of equipment in the name (PDX001RTR or
PDXRTR001 or PDXGW001)
 if you can, use the same nomenclature for a site (PDXRTR001, PDXESW001 for
an ethernet switch, PDXATM001 for an ATM switch)
 for sites within a metropolitan area, find some short acronym that will
make sense to everyone involved (if you're the Lone Ranger, that makes the
task much easier, because we know that Tonto doesn't configure network
equipment  ;-), so in the Portland area, BVRRTR001 for Beaverton, SEARTR001
for Seaside, etc.)
 some folks like to use a nomenclature that represents the function of the
site rather than the name - if you have clear diversity like that, then go
for it
 finally, there are a few shops that use a very precise naming convention
based on Bellcore's conventions - those are mainly telco/telecom shops,
though, and unless you're familiar with that standard, you're better off
finding familiar names.

for buildings within campus networks, we've been fortunate enough to have
alphabetic buildings, and networking, for example, got assigned trees (the
Unix guys got mountains and bridges... LOL)

- Original Message -
From: "LeBrun, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 2:00 PM
Subject: Router/Switch naming standards


> Group,
> I am curious to know the opinions on what are some of the better
> naming standards used to name routers/switches?  I have heard of several
> (using local airport codes being the most common, i.e. PDX001(Portland) or
> ATL001(Atlanta)).  And then of course incrementing the number each time
you
> add a router/switch.  Any suggestions?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



LONG! RE: Router/Switch naming standards

2001-04-06 Thread COULOMBE, TROY

/begin babble

Well, It depends. ;-)

We are currently going through a similar (design) issue.  One of the major
issues of naming is scalability, because much like the network design itself
it can be a real pain later --if not planned for.  Businesses buy other
businesses, sites relocate, become dual homed, etc.  We are _mostly_ a hub
and spoke network for our regions & branches.  So for quite a while we used
a geographical area (self created) to identify the major node, then a name,
then an increment number.
EX: 17rtr01 (Area 17, router # 01) (Atlanta)
Then branch offices hanging off this regional router were as such:
EX: 1701rt1 (Area 17, Sub area 1 router # 01) (Columbia SC)

Then their respective switches (we have a lot of token ring & a growing
number of Ether) were as such:
EX: 17mdf-s001 (Area 17 Main Distro Frame Switch 1) with no idea if it was
TR/ET
EX: 17idf6a-s001 (Area 17 6th floor Int. Distro Frame Switch 1) with no idea
if it was TR/ET

Now: one of the bigger problems with this is--> what happens when you start
to go to a meshed network.  Doesn't follow as neatly. 1701rt1 is now hanging
off of both 17rt01 and 14rt01.  And like I said, b. buy other b.
Overlapping networks (NATing private IPs), etc start making things kinda
crazy until you get it sorted out.
Then later on because sites come & go (networks seem to always be in flux)
you end up with 17rtr01, 1701rt1,1704rt1, & 1707rt1 and the new folks are
wondering where is 1702, 1703, 1705 & 1706.

So what we are now extremely close to finalizing is something along these
lines:
ATL-RT1 (we'll _never_ have more than 9 routers in Atlanta)
ATL-MDF-ES01 Atlanta MDF Ethernet Switch 1 (these are stackable Nortel 450s
& we'll never have more than 99--and five nines chance never more than 9)
ATL-MDF-TS01 Atlanta MDF T/R Switch 1
ATL-MDF-SP01 Atlanta MDF StackProbe 1
ATL-I6A-ES01 Atlanta IDF floor 6A, Ether Sw 1
etc.etc.
Now, that takes care of both the regions & branches hanging off them (along
with a Big E5 size drawing of the network).

So: what about a pretty large Data Center.  250 Racks.  One 6509 for every
for racks.   So here is what we did there:

RDC-CS-S001 Redmond Data Center Core Switch 1
RDC-CS-S002 RDC Core Switch 2
RDC-CS-RT1  RDC Core Switch Router 1 MSFC slot 15 
RDC-CS-RT2  RDC Core Switch Router 2
RDC-CS-RTV1 RDC Core Switch HSRP IP address of RT1/RT2 External
interface  (V for virtual)
RDC-CS-RTV2 RDC CS HSRP IP address of RT1/RT2 Internal interface
RDC-GA-S132 RDC General Access (ie: servers plugged in here @ gig & 100)
Switch located in Rack 132
RDC-GA-S145 RDC Gen. Access Sw located in Rack 145 
RDC-DNS1RDC DNS 1
RDC-HA-BIG1 RDC High Available BigIP (F5 Gear) #1
RDC-HA-BIG2 RDC HA BigIP (F5 Gear) #2
RDC-HA-BIGV1RDC HA BigIP (F5 Gear) Vitual Interface External
RDC-HA-DNS1 RDC HA DNS 1

Then there is stuff like DMZs (or is that DMZzz), Partner connections,
etc.

Basically it takes a bit of planning. ;-)
HTH & good luck,

/end babble
TroyC


-Original Message-
From: LeBrun, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 2:01 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Router/Switch naming standards


Group,
I am curious to know the opinions on what are some of the better
naming standards used to name routers/switches?  I have heard of several
(using local airport codes being the most common, i.e. PDX001(Portland) or
ATL001(Atlanta)).  And then of course incrementing the number each time you
add a router/switch.  Any suggestions?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]