RE: FW: VTP modes Server/Client vs Transparent [7:57650]

2002-11-21 Thread alaerte Vidali
I think that is the best way.  First migrate to local Vlans and after use
Server/Client.

While in Lane you could also use a big domain, with two central switches as
the servers and all the others as clients, but I think your solution is
better.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57832t=57650
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VTP modes Server/Client vs Transparent [7:57650]

2002-11-19 Thread Zim
Like most networking problems it depends.  How large is your switch domain?
Are you doing End to End VLANs or Local?  How large is your STP domain now?
Will it grow larger?  Here a link I would start with
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/21.html ( stater for VTP)
then hit this one
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/neso/lnso/cpso/gcnd_wp.htm (covers
GigE Design)
Design solutions are usually need and resource driven...as for standards
they change(some daily).  JMHO


Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT  wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Network is migrating from ATM to Gigabit Ethernet. Transparent mode was
 default VTP for all distribution layer switches. We had hubs for all
access
 layer switches. With the new migration to Gigabit switches would be at all
 access layer buildings. Would it be beneficial to run transparent abroad
or
 a server/client model.


 Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57696t=57650
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re: VTP modes Server/Client vs Transparent [7:57650]

2002-11-19 Thread Greg Owens
Depending on the size of the network VTP is being deployed, you can divide
the VTP domain into geograhical area or sites that would decrease the VTP
traffic.
 
 From: Zim 
 Date: 2002/11/19 Tue AM 07:01:02 EST
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: VTP modes Server/Client vs Transparent [7:57650]
 
 Like most networking problems it depends.  How large is your switch domain?
 Are you doing End to End VLANs or Local?  How large is your STP domain now?
 Will it grow larger?  Here a link I would start with
 http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/21.html ( stater for VTP)
 then hit this one
 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/neso/lnso/cpso/gcnd_wp.htm (covers
 GigE Design)
 Design solutions are usually need and resource driven...as for standards
 they change(some daily).  JMHO
 
 
 Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT  wrote in
 message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Network is migrating from ATM to Gigabit Ethernet. Transparent mode was
  default VTP for all distribution layer switches. We had hubs for all
 access
  layer switches. With the new migration to Gigabit switches would be at
all
  access layer buildings. Would it be beneficial to run transparent abroad
 or
  a server/client model.
 
 
  Thanks
Greg Owens
202-398-2552




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57697t=57650
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



FW: VTP modes Server/Client vs Transparent [7:57650]

2002-11-19 Thread Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
Presently we run end to end vlans w/LANE. We are going to the gigabit
ethernet design with end to end vlans. We plan for a slow migration to local
vlans. Once the migration to local vlans is complete then a server/client
model might be more efficient. Talking to another network professional,
transparent mode seemed to be the only way during the transition period to
local vlans. I really prefer transperent over the server/client model. But I
don't want my ill advised emotions not to give the other side a fair chance.

-Original Message-
From: Zim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VTP modes Server/Client vs Transparent [7:57650]


Like most networking problems it depends.  How large is your switch domain?
Are you doing End to End VLANs or Local?  How large is your STP domain now?
Will it grow larger?  Here a link I would start with
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/21.html ( stater for VTP)
then hit this one
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/neso/lnso/cpso/gcnd_wp.htm (covers
GigE Design)
Design solutions are usually need and resource driven...as for standards
they change(some daily).  JMHO


Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT  wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Network is migrating from ATM to Gigabit Ethernet. Transparent mode was
 default VTP for all distribution layer switches. We had hubs for all
access
 layer switches. With the new migration to Gigabit switches would be at all
 access layer buildings. Would it be beneficial to run transparent abroad
or
 a server/client model.


 Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57736t=57650
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



VTP modes Server/Client vs Transparent [7:57650]

2002-11-18 Thread Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
Network is migrating from ATM to Gigabit Ethernet. Transparent mode was
default VTP for all distribution layer switches. We had hubs for all access
layer switches. With the new migration to Gigabit switches would be at all
access layer buildings. Would it be beneficial to run transparent abroad or
a server/client model.


Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57650t=57650
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]