Great Daniel,
But I need clarification on this part me be if u have some documnet or some
link
please send me the link...Thanx for the help.anybody has comments since
it
seems a trivial question but not.
Regards,
Munit
Daniel Cotts wrote:
> I seem to recall that the Administrative Distance of static routes that
> specify a local interface has differed between 0 and 1 depending on IOS
> version. I have a hand written note that (I think) says the value is 0 for
> 11.3 and 12.0; but is now 1 for newer IOS versions. If true, your results
> will depend on which IOS your routers are running.
> I'd appreciate comments for those who have more specific info. I'll see if
I
> can find time to experiment.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Munit Singla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:57 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
> >
> >
> > Hi Godswill,
> > Thanx for reply.I agree with u,but Still the doubt persists
> > if both the
> > commands
> > are used then both entries come to the route table.As per
> > your and mine
> > theory
> > also only better administrative distance should come into the
> > route table,but
> > here both are introduced into the route table ,as it seems it has
> > administrative
> > distance of 1 for default gateway of its own
> > interface(obviosly zero is
> > preffered then one)?
> > Why both entries in route table.
> > As confusion is creating from different answers so please
> > reply ,so that all
> > confusions are over.
> > Regards,
> > Munit
> >
> > Godswill Oletu wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Static routes can either have the AD of 1 or 0 depending on
> > the way you add
> > > them to your router.
> > > e.g lates RouterA interface FE0=192.168.0.1/27 and it is
> > connected to
> > > RouterB FE1=192.168.0.2/27 & FE3=10.1.0.1/24.
> > >
> > > To define route to 10.1.0.1/24 on RouterA you have two methods.
> > >
> > > 1. RouterA# IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 (AD=1)
> > > 2. RouterA#IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 FE0 (AD=0)
> > >
> > > If both commands are entered option 2 will be the prefered route.
> > >
> > > So you are correct, choose the one you prefer, it also
> > depends whether you
> > > want to do load balancing, floating static route, etc...
> > >
> > > Regards.
> > > Godswill Oletu
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: Munit Singla
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:44 AM
> > > Subject: Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > Can anybody tell me when I add static route to my default
> > network it
> > shows
> > > > with Administrative distance of 1,whereas we know that
> > static routes to
> > > our
> > > > own interface have AD. of zero.
> > > > Example
> > > > C 10.77.152.128/25 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0
> > > > S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.77.152.129
> > > > is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0
> > > >
> > > > Its showing here with administrative distance of 1 the
> > route with default
> > > > gateway of FastEthernet1/0.
> > > > Please do clear me where I am wrong
> > > > Thanx in advance
> > > > Munit
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59630&t=59533
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
