Re: Wanted-CCIE Lessons Learned/Attitude/Plan [7:49167]

2002-07-23 Thread Reza

Tom,
Thanks for the input about taking the lab.
Where did you find 12.1 IOS Docs?.
I looked at Cisco Press and other book stores on line, they only have 12.0.
Is 12.1 being used in the lab?.

Thanks
Reza




Thomas Larus  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 (I recently failed my first attempt, so weigh my advice accordingly.)


 The short form is:

 1)Read obsessively and quickly start doing simple labs
 2) Labs will raise questions, sending you back to the books and IOS docs
 3) Do complex lab scenarios created by other people until you are blue in
 the face

 4) Always strive to nail down things you are unsure of, and nail down
every
 setting that you are permitted to nail down in you configs (advice from
 Caslow in NMC-1 class, which class is highly recommended and worth every
 penny).  An important motto of the quest for CCIE is Nail everything
down.

 As for time periods, that is impossible for me to set out.  Everyone is
 different.  We all start at different places when we set out for the CCIE.
 Some are top network engineers when they start and have less to learn than
 someone like me.  I have found that this takes much more time than I ever
 planned for initially.

 You should read always and everywhere.  IOS docs, TAC articles, Cisco
Press
 Books, McGraw Hill technical expert books, Caslow, Doyle, etc.  You start
 off by doing labs on individual technologies, such as those provided by
 fatkid, ipexpert, and the like, or labbing up the scenarios in Doyle, etc.
 When you do these labs, you will have questions, which you send you back
to
 the books with a keen interest.  I think that reading in order to find an
 answer or to learn about something that you are dying to learn about leads
 to greater absorption than reading straight through a book with the goal
of
 reading so many pages a day.  I know we need to do both kinds of reading,
 but I am making the point that doing labs makes your absorption and
 compehension of what you read so much deeper.

 You can try to do you own labs, but you may find that you move much faster
 through teh material doing labs prepared by someone else.  Plus, doing
labs
 written by others gets you practice interpreting instructions.

 You soon move on to complex lab scenarios.  Do lots and lots of these.
The
 commercial labs will teach you a lot, and are worth spending money on,
even
 though they may not be perfect.  These commercial labs will teach you that
 many knowledgeable CCIEs make the same kinds of mistakes that you are
scared
 to death of making on the CCIE lab.  It is frustrating, yet somehow
 comforting, to find the glaring errors and omissions in expensive labs
 written by CCIEs.  The authors will tell you to configure something, and
 then completely forget to configure it themselves. (and then continue to
 forget to configure it through several revisions of their labs and lab
 solutions)  You learn from this that it is possible to pass the CCIE even
 though you are prone to making almost unforgivably glaring errors when you
 have years to do it right.  I am a bit absent-minded myself, so that is
 comforting.  (I simply need an 8-hour lucid interval of perfect focus on
 getting every detail right and avoiding landmines, while moving through
the
 tasks at high speed.)

 In short, use lab scenarios early on, and do reading and lab scenarios
 concurrently, and read everything.  I bought the 12.1 IOS Docs in printed
 format, and have really enjoyed reading them.  They are loaded with good
 stuff.  Do NOT buy the old books of IOS docs (I bought a bunch of these,
 mainly as half-price closeouts), because out-of-date docs are almost worse
 than no docs at all.  This IOS has changed a lot from 11.2 or even 12.0 to
 12.1.



 Jennifer Mellone  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  LESSONS LEARNED, ATTITUDE, AND STRUCTURED STUDY PLAN
 
  I was wondering if anyone could elaborate on lessons learned when
 studying
  for CCIE. What did you do right? What did you do wrong? If you had to do
 it
  all over again, what would you change - especially if someone wants to
 pass
  the first time?
 
  I think the attitude do it right and try and pass the first time could
 be
  helpful (I know it doesn't always happen in reality). It seems more
 positive
  than I'll fail the first time so I know what to expect the second or
 third
  or later time.
 
  My instinct tells me that determination and practicing on the routers
 every
  night and on weekends for at least 6 months is key, and is easier said
 than
  done. There are no short-cuts. This is fine; it's the price one must
pay.
  But how does one do that in a methodical and structured manner such that
 all
  the major stones are unturned? Of course, some stones will be unturned
  quicker than others due to experience, and others will be slower due to
 lack
  of experience/knowledge. I feel ad hoc practice could be counter
 productive.
 
  For example, a structured approach would be something 

Wanted-CCIE Lessons Learned/Attitude/Plan [7:49167]

2002-07-18 Thread Jennifer Mellone

LESSONS LEARNED, ATTITUDE, AND STRUCTURED STUDY PLAN

I was wondering if anyone could elaborate on lessons learned when studying
for CCIE. What did you do right? What did you do wrong? If you had to do it
all over again, what would you change - especially if someone wants to pass
the first time?

I think the attitude do it right and try and pass the first time could be
helpful (I know it doesn't always happen in reality). It seems more positive
than I'll fail the first time so I know what to expect the second or third
or later time.

My instinct tells me that determination and practicing on the routers every
night and on weekends for at least 6 months is key, and is easier said than
done. There are no short-cuts. This is fine; it's the price one must pay.
But how does one do that in a methodical and structured manner such that all
the major stones are unturned? Of course, some stones will be unturned
quicker than others due to experience, and others will be slower due to lack
of experience/knowledge. I feel ad hoc practice could be counter productive.

For example, a structured approach would be something like: go through
Caslow's book and do the labs for x-months, and/or do the Fat Kids for
x-months, and/or do the CCBootcamp labs for x-months, and take the Caslow
course x-months before the lab, then hammer down on the weaknesses, etc.
Some comments on this would be great.

I realize this is like Navy Seal training. No amount of conditioning will
*fully* prepare you for the famous hell week. As the Seal trainees say,
The Only Easy Day Was Yesterday ;-)

- Jennifer Mellone
CCNP, FNCNE (Foundry Networks)
B.S.E.E., M.S. Engineering Management
a, b, c, d, e ;-)



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49167t=49167
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]