RE: help!!!!! [7:60061]

2003-01-02 Thread Vicuna, Mark
hi priscilla,

yes was way off left field there... thanks for pointing it out.   i
think ill stay clear of making 3am posts.

:-)


cheers,
mark.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: help! [7:60061]


Vicuna, Mark wrote:
 
 it is the dsap mac (cannocial) of the end hosts are pointing to
 (one of
 the redundant router(s)).  
 
 hth,
 Mark.

I don't think it has anything to do with Destination Service Access
Points
(DSAPs).

 
 -Original Message-
 From: H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 5:42 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: help! [7:60061]
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I found a command when doing DLSW Ethernet Redundancy.  Can
 anyone
 please
 explain to me what the local-mac value should be...
 
  dlsw transparent map local-mac .5432.  remote-mac
 0200.eca2.
 neighbor ..
 
 Is it the mac of the Ethernet interface of the local router, or
 the
 Ethernet
 host that is connecting to it??

Neither of those. It's an address that you make up, (making sure it fits
any
addressing schemes you might have and isn't a duplicate of anything
else, of
course). It is the address that the router uses for the real destination
MAC
address when an end station sends a TEST frame to a host or other
destination. In other words, it is the address that the router is
mapping
the real destination MAC address to. See here:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dls12_rg.htm

This entire feature is a conglomeration of awful technologies that would
have maybe worked despite their complexity, if we hadn't upgraded from
hubs
to swithces. The problem with switches is that they remember where MAC
addresses are and get confused by redundant routers in a DLSw+
environment.
To avoid problems, the redundant routers map the destination address to
unique addresses that you configure. Unless you really need this feature
(or
have to learn it for CCIE for some bizarre reason), I would definitely
stay
clear of it! :-)

Priscilla

 
 Thanks so much for your help in advance,
 
 Best Regards,
 H.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60098t=60061
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



help!!!!! [7:60061]

2003-01-01 Thread H.
Hello,

I found a command when doing DLSW Ethernet Redundancy.  Can anyone please
explain to me what the local-mac value should be...

 dlsw transparent map local-mac .5432.  remote-mac 0200.eca2.
neighbor ..

Is it the mac of the Ethernet interface of the local router, or the Ethernet
host that is connecting to it??

Thanks so much for your help in advance,

Best Regards,
H.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60061t=60061
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: help!!!!! [7:60061]

2003-01-01 Thread Vicuna, Mark
it is the dsap mac (cannocial) of the end hosts are pointing to (one of
the redundant router(s)).  

hth,
Mark.

-Original Message-
From: H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 5:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: help! [7:60061]


Hello,

I found a command when doing DLSW Ethernet Redundancy.  Can anyone
please
explain to me what the local-mac value should be...

 dlsw transparent map local-mac .5432.  remote-mac
0200.eca2.
neighbor ..

Is it the mac of the Ethernet interface of the local router, or the
Ethernet
host that is connecting to it??

Thanks so much for your help in advance,

Best Regards,
H.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60065t=60061
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: help!!!!! [7:60061]

2003-01-01 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Vicuna, Mark wrote:
 
 it is the dsap mac (cannocial) of the end hosts are pointing to
 (one of
 the redundant router(s)).  
 
 hth,
 Mark.

I don't think it has anything to do with Destination Service Access Points
(DSAPs).

 
 -Original Message-
 From: H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 5:42 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: help! [7:60061]
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I found a command when doing DLSW Ethernet Redundancy.  Can
 anyone
 please
 explain to me what the local-mac value should be...
 
  dlsw transparent map local-mac .5432.  remote-mac
 0200.eca2.
 neighbor ..
 
 Is it the mac of the Ethernet interface of the local router, or
 the
 Ethernet
 host that is connecting to it??

Neither of those. It's an address that you make up, (making sure it fits any
addressing schemes you might have and isn't a duplicate of anything else, of
course). It is the address that the router uses for the real destination MAC
address when an end station sends a TEST frame to a host or other
destination. In other words, it is the address that the router is mapping
the real destination MAC address to. See here:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dls12_rg.htm

This entire feature is a conglomeration of awful technologies that would
have maybe worked despite their complexity, if we hadn't upgraded from hubs
to swithces. The problem with switches is that they remember where MAC
addresses are and get confused by redundant routers in a DLSw+ environment.
To avoid problems, the redundant routers map the destination address to
unique addresses that you configure. Unless you really need this feature (or
have to learn it for CCIE for some bizarre reason), I would definitely stay
clear of it! :-)

Priscilla

 
 Thanks so much for your help in advance,
 
 Best Regards,
 H.
 
 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60072t=60061
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: help!!!!! [7:60061]

2003-01-01 Thread Vicuna, Mark
that is what i remember it as when i had read of it a few months back...
let me double check..

cheers,
Mark

-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: help! [7:60061]


Vicuna, Mark wrote:
 
 it is the dsap mac (cannocial) of the end hosts are pointing to
 (one of
 the redundant router(s)).  
 
 hth,
 Mark.

I don't think it has anything to do with Destination Service Access
Points
(DSAPs).

 
 -Original Message-
 From: H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 5:42 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: help! [7:60061]
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I found a command when doing DLSW Ethernet Redundancy.  Can
 anyone
 please
 explain to me what the local-mac value should be...
 
  dlsw transparent map local-mac .5432.  remote-mac
 0200.eca2.
 neighbor ..
 
 Is it the mac of the Ethernet interface of the local router, or
 the
 Ethernet
 host that is connecting to it??

Neither of those. It's an address that you make up, (making sure it fits
any
addressing schemes you might have and isn't a duplicate of anything
else, of
course). It is the address that the router uses for the real destination
MAC
address when an end station sends a TEST frame to a host or other
destination. In other words, it is the address that the router is
mapping
the real destination MAC address to. See here:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dls12_rg.htm

This entire feature is a conglomeration of awful technologies that would
have maybe worked despite their complexity, if we hadn't upgraded from
hubs
to swithces. The problem with switches is that they remember where MAC
addresses are and get confused by redundant routers in a DLSw+
environment.
To avoid problems, the redundant routers map the destination address to
unique addresses that you configure. Unless you really need this feature
(or
have to learn it for CCIE for some bizarre reason), I would definitely
stay
clear of it! :-)

Priscilla

 
 Thanks so much for your help in advance,
 
 Best Regards,
 H.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60083t=60061
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]