Re: route-map next-hop question [7:40431]
If the next-hop is actually an IP address on the router with the route-map, then the packet never gets forwarded beyond the router. I don't think the set interface works on ethernet either as there's some L2 stuff that needs to happen for forwarding to work here Figured the problem out The problem was that the enet interface I was using was the ethernet on the GSR GRP... turns out this is sort of a L3 interface but not completely when I used a real enet line card, this worked fine... Thanks Mark Patrick wrote: > > can't you just route map to ethernet on the local router? > this should send all traffic for the destination network out > that interface regardless. it makes your routing table look > like everything is directly connected but at least it works > for ip route staments.. > > ""bergenpeak"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm trying to use the "set ip next-hop" feature in a route-map > > and seeing some behavior I don't understand. > > > > If I define the "ip next-hop" to be an IP address that's > > not on an interface directly connected to the router performing > > the route-map, the router does the recursive lookup and > > forwards the packet accordingly. This is good. > > > > If I define the "ip next-hop" to be an IP address for > > the remote end of a locally connected POS interface, the > > packet is forwarded out the POS interface. This is good. > > > > If I define the "ip next-hop" to be an IP address for a > > router directly connected via an ethernet interface, the > > packet appears to get dropped. Basically, I have a setup > > where I'm using an ethernet as a point-to-point link > > and when the next-hop is set to the IP at the other end of > > the ethernet /30, forwarding doesn't seem to work. > > > > Any thoughts on why this doesn't work when on ethernet? > > > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40555&t=40431 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: route-map next-hop question [7:40431]
can't you just route map to ethernet on the local router? this should send all traffic for the destination network out that interface regardless. it makes your routing table look like everything is directly connected but at least it works for ip route staments.. ""bergenpeak"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm trying to use the "set ip next-hop" feature in a route-map > and seeing some behavior I don't understand. > > If I define the "ip next-hop" to be an IP address that's > not on an interface directly connected to the router performing > the route-map, the router does the recursive lookup and > forwards the packet accordingly. This is good. > > If I define the "ip next-hop" to be an IP address for > the remote end of a locally connected POS interface, the > packet is forwarded out the POS interface. This is good. > > If I define the "ip next-hop" to be an IP address for a > router directly connected via an ethernet interface, the > packet appears to get dropped. Basically, I have a setup > where I'm using an ethernet as a point-to-point link > and when the next-hop is set to the IP at the other end of > the ethernet /30, forwarding doesn't seem to work. > > Any thoughts on why this doesn't work when on ethernet? > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40464&t=40431 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
route-map next-hop question [7:40431]
I'm trying to use the "set ip next-hop" feature in a route-map and seeing some behavior I don't understand. If I define the "ip next-hop" to be an IP address that's not on an interface directly connected to the router performing the route-map, the router does the recursive lookup and forwards the packet accordingly. This is good. If I define the "ip next-hop" to be an IP address for the remote end of a locally connected POS interface, the packet is forwarded out the POS interface. This is good. If I define the "ip next-hop" to be an IP address for a router directly connected via an ethernet interface, the packet appears to get dropped. Basically, I have a setup where I'm using an ethernet as a point-to-point link and when the next-hop is set to the IP at the other end of the ethernet /30, forwarding doesn't seem to work. Any thoughts on why this doesn't work when on ethernet? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40431&t=40431 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
