Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 PE-CE
OSPFv3 PE-CE is supported starting with IOS 15.2(2)S. The feature name is "OSPFv3 VRF-Lite/PE-CE". Note that you need to use the new form of the OSPFv3 CLI. For example: interface f0/0 vrf forwarding red ipv6 address 2001:db8:1::1/64 ospfv3 1 ipv6 area 0 interface f1/0 vrf forwarding blue ipv6 address 2001:db8:2::1/64 ospfv3 1 ipv6 area 1 router ospfv3 1 router-id 1.1.1.1 ! address-family ipv6 vrf red redistribute bgp 65000 exit-address-family ! address-family ipv6 vrf blue redistribute bgp 65000 exit-address-family Also "show ospfv3 vrf red ..." etc. Regards, Paul On 10/17/2012 09:11 AM, Mohammad Khalil wrote: Hi all, I was trying to implement OSPFv3 and EIGRP6 as the PE-CE in 6VPE deployment but seems IOS does not support that yet Was there any updates in regards? Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] ASA 8.x software and ICMP errors...
Have been noticing this for some time but did not consider it worth pursuing at the time, then recently had to try some traceroutes and nmaps from off-campus for testing purposes and now it's relevant... Our internal infrastructure is on private addresses. We have dynamic NAT enabled for the outgoing traffic for essentially everything. Working just fine, except... If there is an ICMP error generated by an internal router (admin prohibited, TTL exceeded, destination unreachable, etc) that we "want" to pass through, it appears to be going out without NAT applied. NAT works for the routers themselves (e.g., telnet, ping, traceroute to outside work as expected). I'm seeing this because we have a sanity-check ACL on our border that insures the source addresses are within our IP space, and they're kicking out these ICMP error replies and indicating they are indeed still sourced from the internal addresses. I don't recall running into this issue before 8.x... Ring any bells? Jeff ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco 12K vrf limit
On the Cisco 12k prp-2 there is a IPv4 Address limit of 1Million routes. Is there an limit on the number of VRF's that you are able to have? Thanks Erik CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail. You must destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Sup720-3B start in RomMon
On 10/17/12 1:59 AM, Olivier CALVANO wrote: Hi thanks for your answer but no change. I see a possible problems in boot message: System Bootstrap, Version 8.1(3) Copyright (c) 1994-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc. Testing lower main memory - data equals address Testing lower main memory - checkerboard Testing lower main memory - inverse checkerboard Clearing lower 16K memory for cache initialization Clearing bss Clearing autoboot state machine Reading monitor variables from NVRAM Warning: Rommon NVRAM area is corrupted. Initialize the area to default values NVRam corrupted ? Have you changed the coin cell that provides power to the nvram that is on the Sup720? I believe its a BR1225, but I could be wrong. Our Sup720-3bxl would lose its config settings on every power down - replaced that battery and all went fine. -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org/ http://www.ahbl.org ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 PE-CE
Hi , Cisco 7206VXR , c7200-adventerprisek9-mz[1].124-20.T > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:48:23 +0200 > From: swm...@swm.pp.se > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 PE-CE > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > > > I was trying to implement OSPFv3 and EIGRP6 as the PE-CE in 6VPE > > deployment but seems IOS does not support that yet Was there any updates > > in regards? > > It would help if you were to supply the platforms involved and what IOS > versions you're running now. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
Thanks Chuck > From: chuckchu...@gmail.com > To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2 > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:10:33 -0400 > > I've got a 2821 running 12.4 mainline with two feeds, its 768MB RAM still > has about 300MB free. You should be fine. 15.0 or 15.1 will probably use > more RAM, but if you're anywhere near 500MB free, the second feed shouldn't > use any more than 100MB additional. > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP_list > CiscoNSP_list > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:03 AM > To: s...@ytti.fi; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2 > > > > Thanks - unfortunately this 7200 is 1000Km's away, so ram upgrade is not > easy Will 1GB support 2 full tables? > > > > > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:38:59 +0300 > > From: s...@ytti.fi > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2 > > > > On (2012-10-17 14:23 +1100), CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote: > > > > > Apologies - No, only 1Gb ram > > > > DRAM is practically free and in these cases often literally if you > > have time to snoop other people's trashes. > > Always max out DRAM before deploying new routers, as the cost of work > > to do it later is orders of magnitude higher than cost of part to do > > it pre-deployment. > > > > -- > > ++ytti > > ___ > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 PE-CE
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Mohammad Khalil wrote: I was trying to implement OSPFv3 and EIGRP6 as the PE-CE in 6VPE deployment but seems IOS does not support that yet Was there any updates in regards? It would help if you were to supply the platforms involved and what IOS versions you're running now. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] IPv6 PE-CE
Hi all, I was trying to implement OSPFv3 and EIGRP6 as the PE-CE in 6VPE deployment but seems IOS does not support that yet Was there any updates in regards? Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Sup720-3B start in RomMon
17.10.2012 10:59, Olivier CALVANO пишет: Hi thanks for your answer but no change. I see a possible problems in boot message: System Bootstrap, Version 8.1(3) Copyright (c) 1994-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc. Testing lower main memory - data equals address Testing lower main memory - checkerboard Testing lower main memory - inverse checkerboard Clearing lower 16K memory for cache initialization Clearing bss Clearing autoboot state machine Reading monitor variables from NVRAM Warning: Rommon NVRAM area is corrupted. Initialize the area to default values NVRam corrupted ? My guess - battery is dead? I had similar problem with Sup32B near a year ago. Finally two batteries was replaced - one on SP and another one on MSFC. After this Sup was booted up, config register was set. Then power off, wait some time, power on. Rotuer booted as usual. best regards Olivier 2012/10/16 Steve Lalonde : On 16 Oct 2012, at 10:12, Olivier CALVANO wrote: Hi i have a small problems with a new Sup720-3B: When i start it, i have rommon .. at rommon, if i put "boot", he load witout problems the IOS. In IOS, i have added boot system flash disk0:xxx.bin but no change in rommon, i have put "confreg" and select in boot "2" but no change any idea ? possibly the RP and SP config-reg are not the same or even set to go to rommon you can check with the following commands lab13#sh bootvar Configuration register is 0x2102 lab13#remote command switch sh bootvar Configuration register is 0x0 then fix it with lab13#conf t lab13(config)#config-register 0x2102 and the result lab13#sh bootvar Configuration register is 0x2102 lab13#remote command switch sh bootvar Configuration register is 0x2102 now should boot into IOS I have 1 sup720 in my lab that will not remember the config-reg on the SP if it gets powered off Steve ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Sincerely yours, Artyom Viklenko. --- ar...@aws-net.org.ua | http://www.aws-net.org.ua/~artem ar...@viklenko.net | JID: ar...@jabber.aws-net.org.ua FreeBSD: The Power to Serve - http://www.freebsd.org ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Nerdy SNMP/IPV6 question
Il 17/10/2012 14.14, Drew Weaver ha scritto: I was working on our IPv6 provisioning system and I'm having a hard time finding a way to poll the IPv6 routing table via SNMP (SXI 5 on SUP720-3BXL). Is there really no MIB for this yet? Try 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.24.7.1. I use it on 7600 with RSP720 and 15.1(2)S, where it shows VRF routes as well, with unfathomable "zone" (dest and next hop) fields. If you get some data, and understand the zone format, please share. My current experience with IPv6 and SNMP can be described as . Regards, Bergonz -- Ing. Michele Bergonzoni - Laboratori Guglielmo Marconi S.p.a. Phone:+39-051-6781926 e-mail: berg...@labs.it alt.advanced.networks.design.configure.operate ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Nerdy SNMP/IPV6 question
Hi all, I was working on our IPv6 provisioning system and I'm having a hard time finding a way to poll the IPv6 routing table via SNMP (SXI 5 on SUP720-3BXL). Is there really no MIB for this yet? Thanks, -Drew ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
I've got a 2821 running 12.4 mainline with two feeds, its 768MB RAM still has about 300MB free. You should be fine. 15.0 or 15.1 will probably use more RAM, but if you're anywhere near 500MB free, the second feed shouldn't use any more than 100MB additional. Chuck -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:03 AM To: s...@ytti.fi; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2 Thanks - unfortunately this 7200 is 1000Km's away, so ram upgrade is not easy Will 1GB support 2 full tables? > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:38:59 +0300 > From: s...@ytti.fi > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2 > > On (2012-10-17 14:23 +1100), CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote: > > > Apologies - No, only 1Gb ram > > DRAM is practically free and in these cases often literally if you > have time to snoop other people's trashes. > Always max out DRAM before deploying new routers, as the cost of work > to do it later is orders of magnitude higher than cost of part to do > it pre-deployment. > > -- > ++ytti > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
Hi, On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote: Thanks - We do have iBGP, but not large. Short term(6months), it will be an upgrade to ASR Just FYI: The ASR100x is a very different platform from the 7206 and 4GB of ram will get you about 3 full feeds with 450k routes each. The 4GB are not all available to the IOS. If you want lots of full feeds on the box go for 8GB from the beginning. Check the archives for lots of discussion on this. Greetings Christian Cheers. Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:46:16 +0300 From: s...@ytti.fi To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2 On (2012-10-17 18:02 +1100), CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote: Thanks - unfortunately this 7200 is 1000Km's away, so ram upgrade is not easy Will 1GB support 2 full tables? It will. Provided you don't have large iBGP or other AFIs. Long term, schedule upgrade. -- ++ytti ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c...@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden Fax: +49 7032 893 997 - 9 HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart Web: http://www.cksoft.de/ Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Kratzer ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
Max ram load is about 62%, plus we run about 25K additional routes here. As its software based router, CPU pretty much depend of how much traffic it pass. On 17/10/12 13:05, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote: > > > Thanks - What is your ram(+CPU) utilisation? > > >> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:01:34 +0400 >> From: sho...@inblock.ru >> To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com >> CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2 >> >> We run 3 full tables on 1Gb. >> >> On 17/10/12 11:02, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote: >>> Will 1GB support 2 full tables? > > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
Thanks - We do have iBGP, but not large. Short term(6months), it will be an upgrade to ASR Cheers. > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:46:16 +0300 > From: s...@ytti.fi > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2 > > On (2012-10-17 18:02 +1100), CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote: > > > Thanks - unfortunately this 7200 is 1000Km's away, so ram upgrade is not > > easy > > Will 1GB support 2 full tables? > > It will. Provided you don't have large iBGP or other AFIs. > > Long term, schedule upgrade. > -- > ++ytti > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
Thanks - What is your ram(+CPU) utilisation? > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:01:34 +0400 > From: sho...@inblock.ru > To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com > CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2 > > We run 3 full tables on 1Gb. > > On 17/10/12 11:02, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote: > > Will 1GB support 2 full tables? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
We run 3 full tables on 1Gb. On 17/10/12 11:02, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote: > Will 1GB support 2 full tables? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Sup720-3B start in RomMon
Hi thanks for your answer but no change. I see a possible problems in boot message: System Bootstrap, Version 8.1(3) Copyright (c) 1994-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc. Testing lower main memory - data equals address Testing lower main memory - checkerboard Testing lower main memory - inverse checkerboard Clearing lower 16K memory for cache initialization Clearing bss Clearing autoboot state machine Reading monitor variables from NVRAM Warning: Rommon NVRAM area is corrupted. Initialize the area to default values NVRam corrupted ? best regards Olivier 2012/10/16 Steve Lalonde : > On 16 Oct 2012, at 10:12, Olivier CALVANO wrote: > >> Hi >> >> i have a small problems with a new Sup720-3B: >> >> When i start it, i have rommon .. at rommon, if i put "boot", he load >> witout problems the IOS. >> >> >> In IOS, i have added boot system flash disk0:xxx.bin but no change >> in rommon, i have put "confreg" and select in boot "2" but no change >> >> any idea ? > > > possibly the RP and SP config-reg are not the same or even set to go to rommon > > you can check with the following commands > > lab13#sh bootvar > Configuration register is 0x2102 > > lab13#remote command switch sh bootvar > Configuration register is 0x0 > > > then fix it with > > lab13#conf t > lab13(config)#config-register 0x2102 > > > and the result > > lab13#sh bootvar > Configuration register is 0x2102 > > lab13#remote command switch sh bootvar > Configuration register is 0x2102 > > > now should boot into IOS > > > I have 1 sup720 in my lab that will not remember the config-reg on the SP if > it gets powered off > > > > Steve ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
On (2012-10-17 18:02 +1100), CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote: > Thanks - unfortunately this 7200 is 1000Km's away, so ram upgrade is not easy > Will 1GB support 2 full tables? It will. Provided you don't have large iBGP or other AFIs. Long term, schedule upgrade. -- ++ytti ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
Thanks - unfortunately this 7200 is 1000Km's away, so ram upgrade is not easy Will 1GB support 2 full tables? > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:38:59 +0300 > From: s...@ytti.fi > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2 > > On (2012-10-17 14:23 +1100), CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote: > > > Apologies - No, only 1Gb ram > > DRAM is practically free and in these cases often literally if you have > time to snoop other people's trashes. > Always max out DRAM before deploying new routers, as the cost of work to do > it later is orders of magnitude higher than cost of part to do it > pre-deployment. > > -- > ++ytti > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
