[cisco-voip] Advanced Attendant Console 10.5, which Win OS?
Anyone know where I can find which Win OS is required for the Advanced Attendant Console Server 10.5? Thanks, Ryan Huff r...@ryanthomashuff.com http://www.ryanthomashuff.com CCNA R/S, CCNA Wireless, CCNA Voice CCNP Voice, CCIE Collaboration (Written) UCCX Specialist ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] Cisco Telepresence SX20 No incoming Video
Hi I have two Sx20 endpoints registered to Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server Control and using H323. Nating is configured and no firewall. Making calls to Cisco Video test sites I get an error No incoming video. What do I need to configure to resolve this. [cid:image001.png@01D02E82.7BEA8E60] Regards, Henry Gicheru System Engineer Dimension Data Tel: +25420 499 3000 Mobile: +254733477307 Fax:+254204993200 henry.gich...@dimensiondata.com This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer: http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer; ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Advanced Attendant Console 10.5, which Win OS?
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucmac/cuaca/10_5_2/install_admin_guide/CUACA1052WAG.pdf?mdfid=285974824 Page 28: One of the following activated operating systems, with Windows regional settings set to English: - Windows Server 2008 R1 (32-bit) - Windows Server 2008 R2 (64-bit) - Windows Server 2012 (64-bit) - Windows Server 2012 R2 (64-bit) If you have the latest Windows available to you I suggest using it. You will end up with the longest time before having to rebuild the server on a new OS. Two notes, however, to call out: Windows 2012 is only supported on Cisco Unified Communications Manager 10.0(1) or later. Windows 2012 R2 is only supported on Cisco Unified Communications Manager 10.5(1) or later. Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA Network Engineer Direct Voice: 443.541.1518 [Email_Sig_Template_H_shortcopy_UPDATED] Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl | Twitterhttps://twitter.com/HelionTech | LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home | G+https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 8:42 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Advanced Attendant Console 10.5, which Win OS? Anyone know where I can find which Win OS is required for the Advanced Attendant Console Server 10.5? Thanks, Ryan Huff r...@ryanthomashuff.commailto:r...@ryanthomashuff.com http://www.ryanthomashuff.com CCNA R/S, CCNA Wireless, CCNA Voice CCNP Voice, CCIE Collaboration (Written) UCCX Specialist ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Advanced Attendant Console 10.5, which Win OS?
The OS required is Windows 2008 server 32 or 64 bit. Regards, Henry Gicheru Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com wrote: Anyone know where I can find which Win OS is required for the Advanced Attendant Console Server 10.5? Thanks, Ryan Huff r...@ryanthomashuff.com http://www.ryanthomashuff.com CCNA R/S, CCNA Wireless, CCNA Voice CCNP Voice, CCIE Collaboration (Written) UCCX Specialist itevomcid ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Migration from MCS UCCX 8.5.1SU4 to UCS - do not see any setting in desktop administrator
Hi Anthony, The issue is due to CSCul99618 - when the CVD is not initialised completely and the DRF restore is started, the license package is taken to be IPIVR and therefore the CAD component is skipped during the restore. You will see this in the UCCXCOMPONENT.log which Ryan mentioned: 2013/12/06 15:46: Checking the IPIVR license flag before initiating CAD Restore 2013/12/06 15:46: IPIVR package.Skipping CAD Restore Mind you, the backup contains the CAD data but the issue is with the restore and that is the reason we advise that you just perform the restore again after ensuring the CVD is started. This can affect any version till 10.0 and as long as you are above 8.5(1)SU3 ES02, you can be confident that the backup has the CAD data – CSCtz34126/CSCub03368 was causing backups to not have CAD data and was fixed in 8.5(1)SU3 ES02. So in essence, CSCul99618 can affect all UCCX versions which have DRS backup/restore you and it is only during a backup/restore (migration) and NOT during an upgrade. It is fixed in the versions: 9.0(2)SU2 10.5(1) 10.0(1)SU1 If you are below 8.5(1)SU3 ES02 – can be affected by both CSCtz34126/CSCub03368 and/or CSCul99618 If you are above 8.5(1)SU3 ES02 – can be affected by CSCul99618 Hope that helps. [http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/assets/email-signature-tool/logo_02.png?ct=1420440421812] Abhiram Kramadhati Technical Solutions Manager Customer Solutions Success team, CBABU akram...@cisco.commailto:akram...@cisco.com CCIE Voice - 40065 Cisco Systems Australia Pty Limited The Forum 201 Pacific Highway 2065 St Leonards Australia Cisco.comhttp://www.cisco.com/web/AU/ [http://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Please click herehttp://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html for Company Registration Information. From: Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com Date: Monday, 12 January 2015 9:45 pm To: Ryan LaFountain rlafo...@cisco.commailto:rlafo...@cisco.com, Thomas LeMay thomasle...@comcast.netmailto:thomasle...@comcast.net Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@us.didata.commailto:jason.aar...@us.didata.com Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Migration from MCS UCCX 8.5.1SU4 to UCS - do not see any setting in desktop administrator So Ryan, when you say you had a lot of issues around 8.5(1)SU4 backing up the CAD LDAP and restoring, are you literally talking about DRS, or would this also affect upgrades to 9x/10x? On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 9:18:12 AM Ryan LaFountain (rlafount) rlafo...@cisco.commailto:rlafo...@cisco.com wrote: This may be because the LDAP didn’t migrate correctly. The left side of this screen just reads directly from the LDAP structure. The right hand side is static HTML that isn’t stored in the LDAP. I would open a TAC case, but we had a lot of issues around 8.5(1)SU4 backup up the CAD LDAP and restoring is successfully, so probably something there. If you have the DRS logs for the 8.5(1)SU4 cluster, look in the CCXCOMPONENT log and see if it shows backing up the CAD LDAP successfully. Feel free to send me the CCXCOMPONENT log directly and I can take a look too. Thank you, Ryan LaFountain Unified Contact Center Cisco Services Direct: +1 919 392 9898 Hours: M - F 9:00am - 5:00pm Eastern Time On Jan 10, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Thomas LeMay thomasle...@comcast.netmailto:thomasle...@comcast.net wrote: Yes, try browser compatibility setting. Different browsers behave differently with the web pages. tom From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michele Russo (AM) Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 10:19 AM To: 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' Cc: Jason Aarons (AM) Subject: [cisco-voip] Migration from MCS UCCX 8.5.1SU4 to UCS - do not see any setting in desktop administrator Hi all, I am working on a customer migration and upgrade from MCS to UCS and upon performing the restore I noticed the Desktop Administrator Settings were not displaying at all, see image below: Has anyone experienced this problem? Thoughts? Opening a TAC Case now. image001.jpg Michele Russo Harttree Consultant Dimension Data NA 11730 Plaza America Drive Suite 350 Reston, Va 20190 202-460-3965 (cell) 571-203-4007 (desk) michele.ru...@dimensiondata.commailto:michele.ru...@dimensiondata.com ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Re: [cisco-voip] Migration from MCS UCCX 8.5.1SU4 to UCS - do not see any setting in desktop administrator
So Ryan, when you say you had a lot of issues around 8.5(1)SU4 backing up the CAD LDAP and restoring, are you literally talking about DRS, or would this also affect upgrades to 9x/10x? On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 9:18:12 AM Ryan LaFountain (rlafount) rlafo...@cisco.com wrote: This may be because the LDAP didn’t migrate correctly. The left side of this screen just reads directly from the LDAP structure. The right hand side is static HTML that isn’t stored in the LDAP. I would open a TAC case, but we had a lot of issues around 8.5(1)SU4 backup up the CAD LDAP and restoring is successfully, so probably something there. If you have the DRS logs for the 8.5(1)SU4 cluster, look in the CCXCOMPONENT log and see if it shows backing up the CAD LDAP successfully. Feel free to send me the CCXCOMPONENT log directly and I can take a look too. Thank you, Ryan LaFountain Unified Contact Center Cisco Services Direct: +1 919 392 9898 Hours: M - F 9:00am - 5:00pm Eastern Time On Jan 10, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Thomas LeMay thomasle...@comcast.net wrote: Yes, try browser compatibility setting. Different browsers behave differently with the web pages. tom *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Michele Russo (AM) *Sent:* Saturday, January 10, 2015 10:19 AM *To:* 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' *Cc:* Jason Aarons (AM) *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Migration from MCS UCCX 8.5.1SU4 to UCS - do not see any setting in desktop administrator Hi all, I am working on a customer migration and upgrade from MCS to UCS and upon performing the restore I noticed the Desktop Administrator Settings were not displaying at all, see image below: Has anyone experienced this problem? Thoughts? Opening a TAC Case now. image001.jpg Michele Russo Harttree Consultant Dimension Data NA 11730 Plaza America Drive Suite 350 Reston, Va 20190 202-460-3965 (cell) 571-203-4007 (desk) michele.ru...@dimensiondata.com ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data
They did have E1 interfaces for those. Unsure if you’ll be able to find any. It’s a shame these got discontinued as they were the best PRI aggregation devices. From: Tom Storey [mailto:t...@snnap.net] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:57 PM To: Walenta, Philip Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data Hi Philip, I came across those boxes the other day and indeed they look promising. I think the only thing they are lacking are E1 interfaces, which is what all of my current boxes are filled with. Not too much of a big deal though, T1 WICs/VWICs etc are not too expensive. On 12 January 2015 at 18:47, Walenta, Philip philip.wale...@polycom.commailto:philip.wale...@polycom.com wrote: Honestly, go find yourself some old Adtran Atlas gear. It’s ideal for this sort of thing and can emulate everything perfectly (ISDN BRI, PRI, T1, even T.120 data ISDN). From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom Storey Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 12:19 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data Cross posting from cisco-nsp, as there may be more people in the know about the inner workings of this kind of thing over here. :-) On 12 January 2015 at 06:02, Tom Storey t...@snnap.netmailto:t...@snnap.net wrote: Hi everyone. I'm looking at putting together a box with some PRI, BRI and FXS interfaces to act as an exchange in a box. Cisco has a 2 port BRI VIC that can do network emulation (VIC2-2BRI-NT/TE) but I need some help to clarify a point. It seems that this VIC can be used to allow you to connect terminal equipment, which I guess could include a router with another BRI VIC, and place voice calls between the two devices. But, could I take something like a WIC-1B-S/T and connect it to this VIC to place data calls between a router and an access server? Has anyone tried this, or does anyone simply know if it won't work and I'd be wasting my time/money? Perhaps I would have to configure the BRI to do DoV to work? Thanks Tom ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data
Hi Philip, I came across those boxes the other day and indeed they look promising. I think the only thing they are lacking are E1 interfaces, which is what all of my current boxes are filled with. Not too much of a big deal though, T1 WICs/VWICs etc are not too expensive. On 12 January 2015 at 18:47, Walenta, Philip philip.wale...@polycom.com wrote: Honestly, go find yourself some old Adtran Atlas gear. It’s ideal for this sort of thing and can emulate everything perfectly (ISDN BRI, PRI, T1, even T.120 data ISDN). *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Tom Storey *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 12:19 PM *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data Cross posting from cisco-nsp, as there may be more people in the know about the inner workings of this kind of thing over here. :-) On 12 January 2015 at 06:02, Tom Storey t...@snnap.net wrote: Hi everyone. I'm looking at putting together a box with some PRI, BRI and FXS interfaces to act as an exchange in a box. Cisco has a 2 port BRI VIC that can do network emulation (VIC2-2BRI-NT/TE) but I need some help to clarify a point. It seems that this VIC can be used to allow you to connect terminal equipment, which I guess could include a router with another BRI VIC, and place voice calls between the two devices. But, could I take something like a WIC-1B-S/T and connect it to this VIC to place data calls between a router and an access server? Has anyone tried this, or does anyone simply know if it won't work and I'd be wasting my time/money? Perhaps I would have to configure the BRI to do DoV to work? Thanks Tom ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data
Yeah I have one of those cards already, and may pick up another couple. I'm also looking to include BRI and POTS for completeness. :-) On 12 Jan 2015 21:01, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: So simulate a PSTN I just use a router with 4 VWIC2-2MFT-T1E1 cards. Let’s me have 8 sites via PRIs either E1 or T1. Builds your sip/h323 skills J *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Tom Storey *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 2:57 PM *To:* Walenta, Philip *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data Hi Philip, I came across those boxes the other day and indeed they look promising. I think the only thing they are lacking are E1 interfaces, which is what all of my current boxes are filled with. Not too much of a big deal though, T1 WICs/VWICs etc are not too expensive. On 12 January 2015 at 18:47, Walenta, Philip philip.wale...@polycom.com wrote: Honestly, go find yourself some old Adtran Atlas gear. It’s ideal for this sort of thing and can emulate everything perfectly (ISDN BRI, PRI, T1, even T.120 data ISDN). *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Tom Storey *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 12:19 PM *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data Cross posting from cisco-nsp, as there may be more people in the know about the inner workings of this kind of thing over here. :-) On 12 January 2015 at 06:02, Tom Storey t...@snnap.net wrote: Hi everyone. I'm looking at putting together a box with some PRI, BRI and FXS interfaces to act as an exchange in a box. Cisco has a 2 port BRI VIC that can do network emulation (VIC2-2BRI-NT/TE) but I need some help to clarify a point. It seems that this VIC can be used to allow you to connect terminal equipment, which I guess could include a router with another BRI VIC, and place voice calls between the two devices. But, could I take something like a WIC-1B-S/T and connect it to this VIC to place data calls between a router and an access server? Has anyone tried this, or does anyone simply know if it won't work and I'd be wasting my time/money? Perhaps I would have to configure the BRI to do DoV to work? Thanks Tom itevomcid ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data
I haven’t seen a BRI for voice since 1992…..but perhaps they are popular in your location ☺ From: Tom Storey [mailto:t...@snnap.net] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 4:09 PM To: Jason Aarons (AM) Cc: Walenta, Philip; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data Yeah I have one of those cards already, and may pick up another couple. I'm also looking to include BRI and POTS for completeness. :-) On 12 Jan 2015 21:01, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.commailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: So simulate a PSTN I just use a router with 4 VWIC2-2MFT-T1E1 cards. Let’s me have 8 sites via PRIs either E1 or T1. Builds your sip/h323 skills ☺ From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom Storey Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 2:57 PM To: Walenta, Philip Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data Hi Philip, I came across those boxes the other day and indeed they look promising. I think the only thing they are lacking are E1 interfaces, which is what all of my current boxes are filled with. Not too much of a big deal though, T1 WICs/VWICs etc are not too expensive. On 12 January 2015 at 18:47, Walenta, Philip philip.wale...@polycom.commailto:philip.wale...@polycom.com wrote: Honestly, go find yourself some old Adtran Atlas gear. It’s ideal for this sort of thing and can emulate everything perfectly (ISDN BRI, PRI, T1, even T.120 data ISDN). From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom Storey Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 12:19 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data Cross posting from cisco-nsp, as there may be more people in the know about the inner workings of this kind of thing over here. :-) On 12 January 2015 at 06:02, Tom Storey t...@snnap.netmailto:t...@snnap.net wrote: Hi everyone. I'm looking at putting together a box with some PRI, BRI and FXS interfaces to act as an exchange in a box. Cisco has a 2 port BRI VIC that can do network emulation (VIC2-2BRI-NT/TE) but I need some help to clarify a point. It seems that this VIC can be used to allow you to connect terminal equipment, which I guess could include a router with another BRI VIC, and place voice calls between the two devices. But, could I take something like a WIC-1B-S/T and connect it to this VIC to place data calls between a router and an access server? Has anyone tried this, or does anyone simply know if it won't work and I'd be wasting my time/money? Perhaps I would have to configure the BRI to do DoV to work? Thanks Tom itevomcid ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data
So simulate a PSTN I just use a router with 4 VWIC2-2MFT-T1E1 cards. Let’s me have 8 sites via PRIs either E1 or T1. Builds your sip/h323 skills ☺ From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom Storey Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 2:57 PM To: Walenta, Philip Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data Hi Philip, I came across those boxes the other day and indeed they look promising. I think the only thing they are lacking are E1 interfaces, which is what all of my current boxes are filled with. Not too much of a big deal though, T1 WICs/VWICs etc are not too expensive. On 12 January 2015 at 18:47, Walenta, Philip philip.wale...@polycom.commailto:philip.wale...@polycom.com wrote: Honestly, go find yourself some old Adtran Atlas gear. It’s ideal for this sort of thing and can emulate everything perfectly (ISDN BRI, PRI, T1, even T.120 data ISDN). From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom Storey Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 12:19 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data Cross posting from cisco-nsp, as there may be more people in the know about the inner workings of this kind of thing over here. :-) On 12 January 2015 at 06:02, Tom Storey t...@snnap.netmailto:t...@snnap.net wrote: Hi everyone. I'm looking at putting together a box with some PRI, BRI and FXS interfaces to act as an exchange in a box. Cisco has a 2 port BRI VIC that can do network emulation (VIC2-2BRI-NT/TE) but I need some help to clarify a point. It seems that this VIC can be used to allow you to connect terminal equipment, which I guess could include a router with another BRI VIC, and place voice calls between the two devices. But, could I take something like a WIC-1B-S/T and connect it to this VIC to place data calls between a router and an access server? Has anyone tried this, or does anyone simply know if it won't work and I'd be wasting my time/money? Perhaps I would have to configure the BRI to do DoV to work? Thanks Tom itevomcid ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] Jabber over 443 and not 8443?
Has anyone tested Jabber MRA via Expressway over 443 and not 8443?___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber over 443 and not 8443?
I've done a few expressway MRAs, and what you ask is something I wouldn't even attempt. There seems to be a lot of hard-coded magic that happens when the client detects collaboration edge. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Josh Warcop Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 4:06 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Jabber over 443 and not 8443? Has anyone tested Jabber MRA via Expressway over 443 and not 8443? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] LDAP Search Filter Syntax reference
Does anyone have any links / info for LDAP Search Syntax? I am trying to write this filter: Sync all children in ABC OUExcept for children in XYZ OUANDAll children of ABC OU WHERE IpPhone IS NOT null Thanks, Ryan Huff r...@ryanthomashuff.com http://www.ryanthomashuff.com CCNA R/S, CCNA Wireless, CCNA Voice CCNP Voice, CCIE Collaboration (Written) UCCX Specialist ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] LIDB / CallerID outside of the United States
This part of telephony frustrates me to no end, namely because I'm not 100% sure how it works, and just when I think I do know how it's working, it turns out I don't. That being said, I did speak to an LIDB in the US recently, pleading ignorance and asking for help and was surprised as to how much variance there can be to the whole service. It all depends on what LIDB service the provider is using and if they are using one at all, or whether they have created their own. Caching throws all rules and expectations out the window too. The latest issue we had was this: Our PSTN provider had a bug in the network that was causing 25% of inbound calls from that provider to us to fail. We applied a workaround as a band aid to tie us over until software updates could be applied. However, this workaround exposed our internal calling name to the world, where as before this, we had blank, just number. As soon as the workaround was removed, many LIDBs out there cached the last known calling name and attached that to all called parties. I had to contact one to please clear their cache. But I tell you it wasn't easy. Not sure if this helps or not. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 - Original Message - From: Robert Kulagowski rkula...@gmail.com To: Cisco VOIP cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 11:35:19 AM Subject: [cisco-voip] LIDB / CallerID outside of the United States From the SS7 article on Wikipedia, it looks like it should be an international standard. Earlier threads in this mailing list have led me to believe that at least in Canada, (Lelio) if I set outbound caller name, then that's what the telco accepts and delivers to the destination. What is the situation outside of NA? Is there an equivalent of the LIDB in other countries? Is calling party name a thing outside of the U.S.? In which places is it sent by the originating PBX, and where is it done through a database dip? Is there a place where I can figure this out other than broadcasting to this list? Thanks. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP Search Filter Syntax reference
((memberof=ABC,OU=Groups,OU=Company,OU=Users and Groups,DC=NorthAmerica,DC=Company,DC=com)(!( memberof=XYZ,OU=Groups,OU=Company,OU=Users and Groups,DC=NorthAmerica,DC=Company,DC=com))(!(ipPhone=))) Here is an example... -- Chase Mergenthal From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:53 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] LDAP Search Filter Syntax reference Does anyone have any links / info for LDAP Search Syntax? I am trying to write this filter: * Sync all children in ABC OU * Except for children in XYZ OU * AND * All children of ABC OU WHERE IpPhone IS NOT null Thanks, Ryan Huff r...@ryanthomashuff.commailto:r...@ryanthomashuff.com http://www.ryanthomashuff.com CCNA R/S, CCNA Wireless, CCNA Voice CCNP Voice, CCIE Collaboration (Written) UCCX Specialist ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data
Honestly, go find yourself some old Adtran Atlas gear. It’s ideal for this sort of thing and can emulate everything perfectly (ISDN BRI, PRI, T1, even T.120 data ISDN). From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom Storey Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 12:19 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data Cross posting from cisco-nsp, as there may be more people in the know about the inner workings of this kind of thing over here. :-) On 12 January 2015 at 06:02, Tom Storey t...@snnap.netmailto:t...@snnap.net wrote: Hi everyone. I'm looking at putting together a box with some PRI, BRI and FXS interfaces to act as an exchange in a box. Cisco has a 2 port BRI VIC that can do network emulation (VIC2-2BRI-NT/TE) but I need some help to clarify a point. It seems that this VIC can be used to allow you to connect terminal equipment, which I guess could include a router with another BRI VIC, and place voice calls between the two devices. But, could I take something like a WIC-1B-S/T and connect it to this VIC to place data calls between a router and an access server? Has anyone tried this, or does anyone simply know if it won't work and I'd be wasting my time/money? Perhaps I would have to configure the BRI to do DoV to work? Thanks Tom ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
