Re: [cisco-voip] centralized vs distributed media resources

[Joshua Warcop]

Hey,There's a lot of ways to design, but since the introduction of 
video it's popular to centralize conferencing resources. An 8 core Virtual 
Telepresence Server can host a lot of audio-only participants. Cisco Meeting 
Server is essentially the same concept with centralized resources. It also 
depends if PSTN connectivity is distributed or centralized. If it's distributed 
there's usually a reason for local DSP resources. Therefore a light amount of 
confernecing can be done on the local router. For me it comes down to where to 
spend the money.  I would prefer to buy bandwidth for sites and centralized 
compute and resources. However, it's really just a matter of preference. Two or 
five or ten audio streams across the WAN isn't a big deal to me. When the 
conferencing gets above your WAN bandwidth percentage that you've worked out 
for audio then it's definitely a different story. Thanks!  On Thu, 10 Nov 
2016 13:24:22 -0500  Hendrix, Bill W. - US wrote   
Hey guys,     Just wondering what the recommendation is for DSP resources, 
distributed vs centralized.  I’ve always thought it best to have remote DSP 
resources along with centralized resources.  This way, if say you have folks 
conference together  in a remote call, the stream to the central office is one 
stream.  I’m pretty sure the “resource” selected is based on the initiator of 
the conference.     User A at central office calls PSTN, and conferences in 
user at remote office, then the DSP resource would come from the central 
office, assuming it is configured as such in the MRGL.   User B at a remote 
site calls the PSTN which routes thru the Central office connection, then 
conferences in another person who is in their office (yeah, I know they could 
just be on the same call in one room).  In this case, if there are  only 
centralized media resources, wouldn’t there now be two voice streams from that 
remote office to the conference resource at the central office?  If the remote 
office had local media resources, then it would be just one stream to the 
central office, correct?   Isn’t this more ideal?     Regards,   Bill Hendrix   
   ___ cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 






___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] centralized vs distributed media resources

[Hendrix, Bill W. - US]

Hey guys,

  Just wondering what the recommendation is for DSP resources, distributed vs 
centralized.  I've always thought it best to have remote DSP resources along 
with centralized resources.  This way, if say you have folks conference 
together in a remote call, the stream to the central office is one stream.  I'm 
pretty sure the "resource" selected is based on the initiator of the conference.

User A at central office calls PSTN, and conferences in user at remote office, 
then the DSP resource would come from the central office, assuming it is 
configured as such in the MRGL.

User B at a remote site calls the PSTN which routes thru the Central office 
connection, then conferences in another person who is in their office (yeah, I 
know they could just be on the same call in one room).  In this case, if there 
are only centralized media resources, wouldn't there now be two voice streams 
from that remote office to the conference resource at the central office?  If 
the remote office had local media resources, then it would be just one stream 
to the central office, correct?  Isn't this more ideal?


Regards,

Bill Hendrix

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] alternatives to Uplinx?

[Anthony Holloway]

That was a strange way to word the email.  You like what you see, but you
want an alternative?

I have an aversion to using an Uplinx report for an as-built, as it doesn't
enable you to see the forest for the trees.  Just running SELECT * FROM
numplan WHERE tkpatternusage = 3, and cramming all Translation Patterns
into 90 pages of an MS Word document, is not exactly an as-built.

That's more a problem of the usage of the tool, and not the tool itself.
In fact, the tool seems to be built really well, and it's very
customizable. Oh, and I do like how it provides explanations for each
section of the report.

What is the problem you're looking to solve with Uplinx or another similar
tool?

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi  wrote:

>
> I'm liking what I see with Uplinx. Are there others out there?
>
>
> Lelio
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext 56354
> le...@uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P IM Logs

[Parker Pearson - Donoma]

My company creates a product written exactly for this feature for IM&P.  It’s 
written for Cisco (exclusively) and has the Cisco Interoperability 
certification.  We sell it through Cisco partners worldwide.  You can visit our 
product page on our website at http://donomasoftware.com/donoma-stonescribe/ or 
if you prefer, you can see it on the Cisco Marketplace at 
https://marketplace.cisco.com/catalog/companies/donoma-software/products/donoma-stonescribe

If you want to get set up with a demo, you can ping me back for more info & to 
arrange a demo.  Only takes a few minutes!

OK – I’ll go back to lurking.  I promise I only put things out like this when 
someone specifically asks for help on something we offer.

Cheers,

Parker Pearson


[Donoma Software Web Page]

Parker Pearson
Vice President, Marketing & Business Development

Donoma Software
1750 Kraft Dr. Suite 1200 Blacksburg, VA 24060
540.443.3577
par...@donomasoftware.com
www.donomasoftware.com
[Facebook] [Twitter] 
  [LinkedIn] 



From: cisco-voip  on behalf of Dana Tong 

Date: Thursday, November 10, 2016 at 1:23 AM
To: Nick via cisco-voip 
Subject: [cisco-voip] IM&P IM Logs

Hi guys,

Can anyone recommend some options for IM search / recall?

I think there might be some dev software that was published on the forums once.
But am also looking for recommendations for paid solutions. I reached out to a 
company called Verba but have not had a response.

Are there any solutions that do both IM search / compliance and also call 
recording (other than Verba).

Cheers
Dana
The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the 
person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this 
in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this information.



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

[Ahmed Elnagar]

Thanks all for the detailed information.

From: Joe Martini [mailto:joem...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 4:11 PM
To: Ahmed Elnagar 
Cc: Stephen Welsh ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; 
Ryan Huff ; Matthew Loraditch 
; Corson, Teressa 
; Dave Goodwin 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

Cisco IP phones are designed to forward BPDUs between the network and PC port 
to prevent loops and let spanning tree block ports when a switch receives a 
BPDU it sent out.  So if a user connects both ports to the same switch one port 
will go into blocking state to prevent a loop.  If BPDU guard is used like 
others said the port goes into err-disable, again preventing a loop.

The only exception I know of where a loop is created was from a bug that was 
quickly fixed (CSCut26167).

Joe

On Nov 10, 2016, at 8:56 AM, Ryan Huff 
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:

Steven ... correct, by plugging in the PC Port to the switch as well, you would 
be sending BPDUs back into the switch.

So as long as BPDU guard is enabled on the switch ports, then doing this would 
err-disable both switch ports (the one the PC Port and Network Port is plugged 
into). Pretty easy at that point to tell who the culprit is remotely, and in 
person.

= Ryan =



From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
on behalf of Stephen Welsh 
mailto:stephen.we...@unifiedfx.com>>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:43 AM
To: Ahmed Elnagar
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

I thought that this would be prevented by default because of spanning 
tree/BPDU, but it’s common practice to disable spanning tree for access ports 
(i.e. using portfast) so that may allow the loop to occur, so maybe just 
disable port-fast?

Kind Regards

Stephen Welsh
CTO



On 10 Nov 2016, at 13:35, Ahmed Elnagar 
mailto:ahmed_elna...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

That is not nice at all ☹

Did you figure out a way to prevent it from switch side?

From: Matthew Loraditch [mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:34 PM
To: Ahmed Elnagar 
mailto:ahmed_elna...@hotmail.com>>; 
'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: IP Phone Ports

Yes it will create a loop. Not a fun time trying to track these things down. 
I’ve had some non-Cisco IP phones completely down a LAN.

Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebook | 
Twitter | 
LinkedIn 
| G+

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed 
Elnagar
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:28 AM
To: 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

Dear all;

I want to know what will happen if a user connect “by mistake” both the PC port 
and Switch port to the network switch? Will this create a loop? Anyone tried it 
before?


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

[Joe Martini]

Cisco IP phones are designed to forward BPDUs between the network and PC port 
to prevent loops and let spanning tree block ports when a switch receives a 
BPDU it sent out.  So if a user connects both ports to the same switch one port 
will go into blocking state to prevent a loop.  If BPDU guard is used like 
others said the port goes into err-disable, again preventing a loop.

The only exception I know of where a loop is created was from a bug that was 
quickly fixed (CSCut26167).  

Joe  

On Nov 10, 2016, at 8:56 AM, Ryan Huff  wrote:

Steven ... correct, by plugging in the PC Port to the switch as well, you would 
be sending BPDUs back into the switch.

So as long as BPDU guard is enabled on the switch ports, then doing this would 
err-disable both switch ports (the one the PC Port and Network Port is plugged 
into). Pretty easy at that point to tell who the culprit is remotely, and in 
person.

= Ryan =


From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> on behalf of Stephen Welsh 
mailto:stephen.we...@unifiedfx.com>>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:43 AM
To: Ahmed Elnagar
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports
 
I thought that this would be prevented by default because of spanning 
tree/BPDU, but it’s common practice to disable spanning tree for access ports 
(i.e. using portfast) so that may allow the loop to occur, so maybe just 
disable port-fast?

Kind Regards

Stephen Welsh
CTO



> On 10 Nov 2016, at 13:35, Ahmed Elnagar  > wrote:
> 
> That is not nice at all L
>  
> Did you figure out a way to prevent it from switch side?
>  
> From: Matthew Loraditch [mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com 
> ] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:34 PM
> To: Ahmed Elnagar  >; 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
> '  >
> Subject: RE: IP Phone Ports
>  
> Yes it will create a loop. Not a fun time trying to track these things down. 
> I’ve had some non-Cisco IP phones completely down a LAN.
>  
> Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
> Network Engineer
> Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
> 
> Facebook  | Twitter 
>  | LinkedIn 
>  | G+ 
> 
>  
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net 
> ] On Behalf Of Ahmed Elnagar
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:28 AM
> To: 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net ' 
> mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports
>  
> Dear all;
>  
> I want to know what will happen if a user connect “by mistake” both the PC 
> port and Switch port to the network switch? Will this create a loop? Anyone 
> tried it before?
>  
>  
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> 
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

[Ryan Huff]

Steven ... correct, by plugging in the PC Port to the switch as well, you would 
be sending BPDUs back into the switch.


So as long as BPDU guard is enabled on the switch ports, then doing this would 
err-disable both switch ports (the one the PC Port and Network Port is plugged 
into). Pretty easy at that point to tell who the culprit is remotely, and in 
person.


= Ryan =




From: cisco-voip  on behalf of Stephen 
Welsh 
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:43 AM
To: Ahmed Elnagar
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

I thought that this would be prevented by default because of spanning 
tree/BPDU, but it's common practice to disable spanning tree for access ports 
(i.e. using portfast) so that may allow the loop to occur, so maybe just 
disable port-fast?

Kind Regards

Stephen Welsh
CTO

[cid:CBBF0493-235C-43D2-A874-9FB3D95AF598@b2.unifiedfx.com]

On 10 Nov 2016, at 13:35, Ahmed Elnagar 
mailto:ahmed_elna...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

That is not nice at all :(

Did you figure out a way to prevent it from switch side?

From: Matthew Loraditch [mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:34 PM
To: Ahmed Elnagar 
mailto:ahmed_elna...@hotmail.com>>; 
'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: IP Phone Ports

Yes it will create a loop. Not a fun time trying to track these things down. 
I've had some non-Cisco IP phones completely down a LAN.

Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebook | 
Twitter | 
LinkedIn 
| G+

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed 
Elnagar
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:28 AM
To: 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

Dear all;

I want to know what will happen if a user connect "by mistake" both the PC port 
and Switch port to the network switch? Will this create a loop? Anyone tried it 
before?


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

[Dave Goodwin]

If you enable bpduguard it will err-disable the port(s) upon receipt of a
BPDU.

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM Stephen Welsh 
wrote:

> I thought that this would be prevented by default because of spanning
> tree/BPDU, but it’s common practice to disable spanning tree for access
> ports (i.e. using portfast) so that may allow the loop to occur, so maybe
> just disable port-fast?
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Stephen Welsh
> CTO
>
>
> On 10 Nov 2016, at 13:35, Ahmed Elnagar  wrote:
>
> That is not nice at all L
>
> Did you figure out a way to prevent it from switch side?
>
> *From:* Matthew Loraditch [mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com
> ]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:34 PM
> *To:* Ahmed Elnagar ; '
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 
> *Subject:* RE: IP Phone Ports
>
> Yes it will create a loop. Not a fun time trying to track these things
> down. I’ve had some non-Cisco IP phones completely down a LAN.
>
>
> Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
> Network Engineer
> Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
> Facebook  | Twitter
>  | LinkedIn
>  |
> G+ 
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net
> ] *On Behalf Of *Ahmed Elnagar
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:28 AM
> *To:* 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports
>
> Dear all;
>
> I want to know what will happen if a user connect “by mistake” both the PC
> port and Switch port to the network switch? Will this create a loop? Anyone
> tried it before?
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

[Stephen Welsh]

I thought that this would be prevented by default because of spanning 
tree/BPDU, but it’s common practice to disable spanning tree for access ports 
(i.e. using portfast) so that may allow the loop to occur, so maybe just 
disable port-fast?

Kind Regards

Stephen Welsh
CTO

[cid:CBBF0493-235C-43D2-A874-9FB3D95AF598@b2.unifiedfx.com]

On 10 Nov 2016, at 13:35, Ahmed Elnagar 
mailto:ahmed_elna...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

That is not nice at all ☹

Did you figure out a way to prevent it from switch side?

From: Matthew Loraditch [mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:34 PM
To: Ahmed Elnagar 
mailto:ahmed_elna...@hotmail.com>>; 
'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: IP Phone Ports

Yes it will create a loop. Not a fun time trying to track these things down. 
I’ve had some non-Cisco IP phones completely down a LAN.

Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebook | 
Twitter | 
LinkedIn 
| G+

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed 
Elnagar
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:28 AM
To: 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

Dear all;

I want to know what will happen if a user connect “by mistake” both the PC port 
and Switch port to the network switch? Will this create a loop? Anyone tried it 
before?


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

[Corson, Teressa]

I, too, have had users plug both phone ports into the network.  Amazing how 
quickly the network goes down.  :)  I don't recommend trying it.  However, you 
will see lots of "pretty" flashing lights on the switches in the network!

Teressa Corson, CCNP, CCDA, CCNP-Voice
TSS VI, Operations
Network Operations
State of NH, Department of Information Technology
603-223-5727
www.nh.gov/doit

[ccnp_voice_sm]  [ccnp_routingswitching_sm]   [ccda_sm]

Statement of Confidentiality:  The contents of this message are confidential.  
Any unauthorized disclosure, reproduction, use or dissemination (either in 
whole or in part) is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message from your 
system.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:34 AM
To: Ahmed Elnagar; 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net'
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

Yes it will create a loop. Not a fun time trying to track these things down. 
I've had some non-Cisco IP phones completely down a LAN.

Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebook | 
Twitter | 
LinkedIn 
| G+

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed 
Elnagar
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:28 AM
To: 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

Dear all;

I want to know what will happen if a user connect "by mistake" both the PC port 
and Switch port to the network switch? Will this create a loop? Anyone tried it 
before?


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P IM Logs

[Ryan Huff]

I can't recall a paid app (although I am sure one may exist ... )


Here is a GUI I wrote in PHP awhile back (based on the pgSQL schema released 
with IMP 9.x ... but I don't think much has changed). Just need a web server.


It has basic search capabilities and is decently made software; can be easily 
added on to and expanded. Its really easy for me to work with so if you need 
any help installing / customizing; more than happy to help.


https://github.com/ryanthuff/cpimdb


= Ryan =



From: Dana Tong 
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:19 AM
To: Ryan Huff
Cc: Nick via cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P IM Logs


Yes. We have an postgresql db. Looking for a front end to search IM.

Regards
Dana Tong - Yell IT
ENTERPRISE SECURITY ENTERPRISE NETWORKING ALL THINGS CLOUD

m. 0416 165 030
f. 07 3059 6354
e. dana.t...@yellit.com.au
w. www.yellit.com.au
s. Suite 3, Level 3, 320 Adelaide St, Brisbane, 4000
p. PO Box 111, Brisbane, 4000

If you have received this email from Yell IT in error please notify the system 
manager at supp...@yellit.com.au. This message contains confidential 
information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the 
named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail 
by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended 
recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any 
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
Think before you print.


From: Ryan Huff 
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 9:48:57 PM
To: Dana Tong
Cc: Nick via cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P IM Logs

My recommendation isn't an all-in-one 

For call recording, can you use MediaSense? Easy to setup and works fairly well 
(using BiB or SPAN based recording).

For IM search; are you saying you have the 3rd party database now, and are 
looking for away to search the database?

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 10, 2016, at 1:24 AM, Dana Tong 
mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> wrote:

Hi guys,

Can anyone recommend some options for IM search / recall?

I think there might be some dev software that was published on the forums once.
But am also looking for recommendations for paid solutions. I reached out to a 
company called Verba but have not had a response.

Are there any solutions that do both IM search / compliance and also call 
recording (other than Verba).

Cheers
Dana
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

[Ahmed Elnagar]

That is not nice at all :(

Did you figure out a way to prevent it from switch side?

From: Matthew Loraditch [mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:34 PM
To: Ahmed Elnagar ; 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 

Subject: RE: IP Phone Ports

Yes it will create a loop. Not a fun time trying to track these things down. 
I've had some non-Cisco IP phones completely down a LAN.

Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebook | 
Twitter | 
LinkedIn 
| G+

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed 
Elnagar
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:28 AM
To: 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

Dear all;

I want to know what will happen if a user connect "by mistake" both the PC port 
and Switch port to the network switch? Will this create a loop? Anyone tried it 
before?


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

[Matthew Loraditch]

Yes it will create a loop. Not a fun time trying to track these things down. 
I've had some non-Cisco IP phones completely down a LAN.

Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518

Facebook | 
Twitter | 
LinkedIn 
| G+

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed 
Elnagar
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:28 AM
To: 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' 
Subject: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

Dear all;

I want to know what will happen if a user connect "by mistake" both the PC port 
and Switch port to the network switch? Will this create a loop? Anyone tried it 
before?


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

[Ahmed Elnagar]

Dear all;

I want to know what will happen if a user connect "by mistake" both the PC port 
and Switch port to the network switch? Will this create a loop? Anyone tried it 
before?


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P IM Logs

[Dana Tong]

Yes. We have an postgresql db. Looking for a front end to search IM.

Regards
Dana Tong - Yell IT
ENTERPRISE SECURITY ENTERPRISE NETWORKING ALL THINGS CLOUD

m. 0416 165 030
f. 07 3059 6354
e. dana.t...@yellit.com.au
w. www.yellit.com.au
s. Suite 3, Level 3, 320 Adelaide St, Brisbane, 4000
p. PO Box 111, Brisbane, 4000

If you have received this email from Yell IT in error please notify the system 
manager at supp...@yellit.com.au. This message contains confidential 
information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the 
named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail 
by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended 
recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any 
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
Think before you print.


From: Ryan Huff 
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 9:48:57 PM
To: Dana Tong
Cc: Nick via cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P IM Logs

My recommendation isn't an all-in-one 

For call recording, can you use MediaSense? Easy to setup and works fairly well 
(using BiB or SPAN based recording).

For IM search; are you saying you have the 3rd party database now, and are 
looking for away to search the database?

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 10, 2016, at 1:24 AM, Dana Tong 
mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> wrote:

Hi guys,

Can anyone recommend some options for IM search / recall?

I think there might be some dev software that was published on the forums once.
But am also looking for recommendations for paid solutions. I reached out to a 
company called Verba but have not had a response.

Are there any solutions that do both IM search / compliance and also call 
recording (other than Verba).

Cheers
Dana
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P IM Logs

[Ryan Huff]

My recommendation isn't an all-in-one 

For call recording, can you use MediaSense? Easy to setup and works fairly well 
(using BiB or SPAN based recording).

For IM search; are you saying you have the 3rd party database now, and are 
looking for away to search the database?

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 10, 2016, at 1:24 AM, Dana Tong 
mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> wrote:

Hi guys,

Can anyone recommend some options for IM search / recall?

I think there might be some dev software that was published on the forums once.
But am also looking for recommendations for paid solutions. I reached out to a 
company called Verba but have not had a response.

Are there any solutions that do both IM search / compliance and also call 
recording (other than Verba).

Cheers
Dana
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip