Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO
Not too mention, Cisco doesn't consistently apply the bootable VS non-bootable policy to their apps. E.g., IM&P and UCCX ISOs from CCO are bootable. On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:30 PM Charles Goldsmith wrote: > I'm 100% beside you, I've yet to see them look at it, just not something > I'm willing to risk though. > > With the way licensing is these days, the restrictions of bootable ISO > downloads is kinda silly. I see no reason why they restrict it, since if > we really wanted to, we can download the publicly available ISO, add the > bootrom, boot it up, change root login, and do what we want. Restricting > the bootables only slows down our support for the customer. > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:26 PM Ryan Huff wrote: > >> Totally see your point. >> >> While I guess it may be a possibility, TAC has never, in my experience, >> come close to digging that deep to look for an exit from a support request >> (which is conceivably why they would look that deep since it poses no >> functional risk). In my 20+ years of experience with TAC and Cisco, as long >> as the “thing” is under a support contract, TAC is far more willing to >> assist you than to look for an exit. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 6, 2020, at 12:42, Charles Goldsmith wrote: >> >> >> Agreed, but I've never done this for a customer, and here is my >> reasoning. From my understanding, when you install/upgrade, the md5 of the >> iso used is written into the logs or a file on the system. If TAC were so >> inclined, they could tell if you installed from valid media or not. >> >> Granted, I've had TAC supplied bootable media fail the media test and not >> match md5, but was cleared in writing to use it. >> >> I've never had TAC check my files before, but there is always the >> possibility. >> >> PUT can be a bit delayed (at least it has been for me), but never more >> than about 24 hours. Seems we get most orders in within 12 - 18 hours. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:17 AM Ryan Huff wrote: >> >>> I can handle the bootable issue far faster and more efficiently than the >>> PUT process can, which is one of the reasons why I’ve found PUT to not be >>> super useful to me. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:33, Pawlowski, Adam wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> As far as I know, ordering from PUT creates a sales order number that is >>> used for entitlement when migrating your licenses. It also gives you a >>> bootable ISO or should. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Nick >>> via cisco-voip >>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 6, 2020 11:20 AM >>> *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO >>> >>> >>> >>> The upgrade files for CUCM 12.5 both SU1 and SU2 both state the >>> following >>> >>> >>> >>> For upgrades from 12.x only. Upgrades from 11.x or earlier are requested >>> via PUT >>> >>> >>> >>> Is this just incorrect wording as far as i am aware there has never been >>> any different files for upgrades from 11 or 12, I have ordered 12.5.1 SU1 >>> from PUT and the upgrade file is identical to the one you can download from >>> CCO supposedly for 12 only? >>> >>> >>> >>> Anyone able to confirm these are the same files? >>> ___ >>> cisco-voip mailing list >>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >>> >>> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce8ead415b0184407467f08d7ab2240bd%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166035922535203&sdata=XxLnfHbAA5ShezR82O0U%2BZQy%2B2XpZowwZ%2BZ5QDtsacc%3D&reserved=0 >>> <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3b05623a7e6548c6112508d7ab2be0d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166077248718633&sdata=ZIlMYNREw5lOrTLV49aUedbFRZ15Nnj14PNZ745gwO4%3D&reserved=0> >>> >>> ___ >>> cisco-voip mailing list >>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >>> <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3b05623a7e6548c6112508d7ab2be0d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166077248728637&sdata=sbYrnAkK%2BFhL5FXCGHStfpbG9EZ1Z10ATKwYnP6iWYc%3D&reserved=0> >>> >> ___ >> cisco-voip mailing list >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO
I'm 100% beside you, I've yet to see them look at it, just not something I'm willing to risk though. With the way licensing is these days, the restrictions of bootable ISO downloads is kinda silly. I see no reason why they restrict it, since if we really wanted to, we can download the publicly available ISO, add the bootrom, boot it up, change root login, and do what we want. Restricting the bootables only slows down our support for the customer. On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:26 PM Ryan Huff wrote: > Totally see your point. > > While I guess it may be a possibility, TAC has never, in my experience, > come close to digging that deep to look for an exit from a support request > (which is conceivably why they would look that deep since it poses no > functional risk). In my 20+ years of experience with TAC and Cisco, as long > as the “thing” is under a support contract, TAC is far more willing to > assist you than to look for an exit. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 6, 2020, at 12:42, Charles Goldsmith wrote: > > > Agreed, but I've never done this for a customer, and here is my > reasoning. From my understanding, when you install/upgrade, the md5 of the > iso used is written into the logs or a file on the system. If TAC were so > inclined, they could tell if you installed from valid media or not. > > Granted, I've had TAC supplied bootable media fail the media test and not > match md5, but was cleared in writing to use it. > > I've never had TAC check my files before, but there is always the > possibility. > > PUT can be a bit delayed (at least it has been for me), but never more > than about 24 hours. Seems we get most orders in within 12 - 18 hours. > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:17 AM Ryan Huff wrote: > >> I can handle the bootable issue far faster and more efficiently than the >> PUT process can, which is one of the reasons why I’ve found PUT to not be >> super useful to me. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:33, Pawlowski, Adam wrote: >> >> >> >> As far as I know, ordering from PUT creates a sales order number that is >> used for entitlement when migrating your licenses. It also gives you a >> bootable ISO or should. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Nick >> via cisco-voip >> *Sent:* Thursday, February 6, 2020 11:20 AM >> *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO >> >> >> >> The upgrade files for CUCM 12.5 both SU1 and SU2 both state the following >> >> >> >> For upgrades from 12.x only. Upgrades from 11.x or earlier are requested >> via PUT >> >> >> >> Is this just incorrect wording as far as i am aware there has never been >> any different files for upgrades from 11 or 12, I have ordered 12.5.1 SU1 >> from PUT and the upgrade file is identical to the one you can download from >> CCO supposedly for 12 only? >> >> >> >> Anyone able to confirm these are the same files? >> ___ >> cisco-voip mailing list >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >> >> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce8ead415b0184407467f08d7ab2240bd%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166035922535203&sdata=XxLnfHbAA5ShezR82O0U%2BZQy%2B2XpZowwZ%2BZ5QDtsacc%3D&reserved=0 >> <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3b05623a7e6548c6112508d7ab2be0d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166077248718633&sdata=ZIlMYNREw5lOrTLV49aUedbFRZ15Nnj14PNZ745gwO4%3D&reserved=0> >> >> ___ >> cisco-voip mailing list >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3b05623a7e6548c6112508d7ab2be0d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166077248728637&sdata=sbYrnAkK%2BFhL5FXCGHStfpbG9EZ1Z10ATKwYnP6iWYc%3D&reserved=0> >> > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO
Totally see your point. While I guess it may be a possibility, TAC has never, in my experience, come close to digging that deep to look for an exit from a support request (which is conceivably why they would look that deep since it poses no functional risk). In my 20+ years of experience with TAC and Cisco, as long as the “thing” is under a support contract, TAC is far more willing to assist you than to look for an exit. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2020, at 12:42, Charles Goldsmith wrote: Agreed, but I've never done this for a customer, and here is my reasoning. From my understanding, when you install/upgrade, the md5 of the iso used is written into the logs or a file on the system. If TAC were so inclined, they could tell if you installed from valid media or not. Granted, I've had TAC supplied bootable media fail the media test and not match md5, but was cleared in writing to use it. I've never had TAC check my files before, but there is always the possibility. PUT can be a bit delayed (at least it has been for me), but never more than about 24 hours. Seems we get most orders in within 12 - 18 hours. On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:17 AM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I can handle the bootable issue far faster and more efficiently than the PUT process can, which is one of the reasons why I’ve found PUT to not be super useful to me. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:33, Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote: As far as I know, ordering from PUT creates a sales order number that is used for entitlement when migrating your licenses. It also gives you a bootable ISO or should. From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Nick via cisco-voip Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 11:20 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO The upgrade files for CUCM 12.5 both SU1 and SU2 both state the following For upgrades from 12.x only. Upgrades from 11.x or earlier are requested via PUT Is this just incorrect wording as far as i am aware there has never been any different files for upgrades from 11 or 12, I have ordered 12.5.1 SU1 from PUT and the upgrade file is identical to the one you can download from CCO supposedly for 12 only? Anyone able to confirm these are the same files? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce8ead415b0184407467f08d7ab2240bd%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166035922535203&sdata=XxLnfHbAA5ShezR82O0U%2BZQy%2B2XpZowwZ%2BZ5QDtsacc%3D&reserved=0<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3b05623a7e6548c6112508d7ab2be0d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166077248718633&sdata=ZIlMYNREw5lOrTLV49aUedbFRZ15Nnj14PNZ745gwO4%3D&reserved=0> ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3b05623a7e6548c6112508d7ab2be0d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166077248728637&sdata=sbYrnAkK%2BFhL5FXCGHStfpbG9EZ1Z10ATKwYnP6iWYc%3D&reserved=0> ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO
Perhaps, less inefficiencies of the tool and rather my disposition. I have every ISO since 7.5.x. It’s far easier for me to address offline and go, than to download from eDelivery (which isn’t PUT, but rather a result of the PUT process), so perhaps misplaced blame.. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2020, at 12:39, Wes Sisk (wsisk) wrote: When last I looked PUT fulfillment was by electronic posting and download in countries where that is legal. Some geo’s require physical media and the creates a shipping limitation. What inefficiency do you experience with PUT? Thanks, Wes On Feb 6, 2020, at 12:17 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I can handle the bootable issue far faster and more efficiently than the PUT process can, which is one of the reasons why I’ve found PUT to not be super useful to me. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:33, Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote: As far as I know, ordering from PUT creates a sales order number that is used for entitlement when migrating your licenses. It also gives you a bootable ISO or should. From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Nick via cisco-voip Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 11:20 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO The upgrade files for CUCM 12.5 both SU1 and SU2 both state the following For upgrades from 12.x only. Upgrades from 11.x or earlier are requested via PUT Is this just incorrect wording as far as i am aware there has never been any different files for upgrades from 11 or 12, I have ordered 12.5.1 SU1 from PUT and the upgrade file is identical to the one you can download from CCO supposedly for 12 only? Anyone able to confirm these are the same files? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce8ead415b0184407467f08d7ab2240bd%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166035922535203&sdata=XxLnfHbAA5ShezR82O0U%2BZQy%2B2XpZowwZ%2BZ5QDtsacc%3D&reserved=0<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7C39f87c69f6484c3b7d4a08d7ab2b8bb3%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166075820202425&sdata=0AIS%2FXm2GJ4mVAbKtqbyq3dVEKEweRwDzffjBSd%2FEww%3D&reserved=0> ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7C39f87c69f6484c3b7d4a08d7ab2b8bb3%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166075820212424&sdata=KD08JAVgyNZHIq8xQY9HiXvHNlsHHxS8J1uVsdI2%2BNA%3D&reserved=0> ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO
Agreed, but I've never done this for a customer, and here is my reasoning. >From my understanding, when you install/upgrade, the md5 of the iso used is written into the logs or a file on the system. If TAC were so inclined, they could tell if you installed from valid media or not. Granted, I've had TAC supplied bootable media fail the media test and not match md5, but was cleared in writing to use it. I've never had TAC check my files before, but there is always the possibility. PUT can be a bit delayed (at least it has been for me), but never more than about 24 hours. Seems we get most orders in within 12 - 18 hours. On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:17 AM Ryan Huff wrote: > I can handle the bootable issue far faster and more efficiently than the > PUT process can, which is one of the reasons why I’ve found PUT to not be > super useful to me. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:33, Pawlowski, Adam wrote: > > > > As far as I know, ordering from PUT creates a sales order number that is > used for entitlement when migrating your licenses. It also gives you a > bootable ISO or should. > > > > > > > > *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Nick > via cisco-voip > *Sent:* Thursday, February 6, 2020 11:20 AM > *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO > > > > The upgrade files for CUCM 12.5 both SU1 and SU2 both state the following > > > > For upgrades from 12.x only. Upgrades from 11.x or earlier are requested > via PUT > > > > Is this just incorrect wording as far as i am aware there has never been > any different files for upgrades from 11 or 12, I have ordered 12.5.1 SU1 > from PUT and the upgrade file is identical to the one you can download from > CCO supposedly for 12 only? > > > > Anyone able to confirm these are the same files? > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > > https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce8ead415b0184407467f08d7ab2240bd%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166035922535203&sdata=XxLnfHbAA5ShezR82O0U%2BZQy%2B2XpZowwZ%2BZ5QDtsacc%3D&reserved=0 > > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO
When last I looked PUT fulfillment was by electronic posting and download in countries where that is legal. Some geo’s require physical media and the creates a shipping limitation. What inefficiency do you experience with PUT? Thanks, Wes On Feb 6, 2020, at 12:17 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I can handle the bootable issue far faster and more efficiently than the PUT process can, which is one of the reasons why I’ve found PUT to not be super useful to me. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:33, Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote: As far as I know, ordering from PUT creates a sales order number that is used for entitlement when migrating your licenses. It also gives you a bootable ISO or should. From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Nick via cisco-voip Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 11:20 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO The upgrade files for CUCM 12.5 both SU1 and SU2 both state the following For upgrades from 12.x only. Upgrades from 11.x or earlier are requested via PUT Is this just incorrect wording as far as i am aware there has never been any different files for upgrades from 11 or 12, I have ordered 12.5.1 SU1 from PUT and the upgrade file is identical to the one you can download from CCO supposedly for 12 only? Anyone able to confirm these are the same files? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce8ead415b0184407467f08d7ab2240bd%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166035922535203&sdata=XxLnfHbAA5ShezR82O0U%2BZQy%2B2XpZowwZ%2BZ5QDtsacc%3D&reserved=0 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO
this. When last I looked: PUT does create a sales order which helps address any licensing questions, re-issues, etc. ‘Upgrade’ media isn’t always the same as install media. PUT gets bootable install media in case of reinstall or disaster. And PUT doesn’t get the latest SU. PUT gets latest Maintenance Release. Thanks, Wes On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:32 AM, Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote: As far as I know, ordering from PUT creates a sales order number that is used for entitlement when migrating your licenses. It also gives you a bootable ISO or should. From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Nick via cisco-voip Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 11:20 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO The upgrade files for CUCM 12.5 both SU1 and SU2 both state the following For upgrades from 12.x only. Upgrades from 11.x or earlier are requested via PUT Is this just incorrect wording as far as i am aware there has never been any different files for upgrades from 11 or 12, I have ordered 12.5.1 SU1 from PUT and the upgrade file is identical to the one you can download from CCO supposedly for 12 only? Anyone able to confirm these are the same files? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO
I can handle the bootable issue far faster and more efficiently than the PUT process can, which is one of the reasons why I’ve found PUT to not be super useful to me. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:33, Pawlowski, Adam wrote: As far as I know, ordering from PUT creates a sales order number that is used for entitlement when migrating your licenses. It also gives you a bootable ISO or should. From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Nick via cisco-voip Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 11:20 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO The upgrade files for CUCM 12.5 both SU1 and SU2 both state the following For upgrades from 12.x only. Upgrades from 11.x or earlier are requested via PUT Is this just incorrect wording as far as i am aware there has never been any different files for upgrades from 11 or 12, I have ordered 12.5.1 SU1 from PUT and the upgrade file is identical to the one you can download from CCO supposedly for 12 only? Anyone able to confirm these are the same files? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce8ead415b0184407467f08d7ab2240bd%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637166035922535203&sdata=XxLnfHbAA5ShezR82O0U%2BZQy%2B2XpZowwZ%2BZ5QDtsacc%3D&reserved=0 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO
As far as I know, ordering from PUT creates a sales order number that is used for entitlement when migrating your licenses. It also gives you a bootable ISO or should. From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Nick via cisco-voip Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 11:20 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO The upgrade files for CUCM 12.5 both SU1 and SU2 both state the following For upgrades from 12.x only. Upgrades from 11.x or earlier are requested via PUT Is this just incorrect wording as far as i am aware there has never been any different files for upgrades from 11 or 12, I have ordered 12.5.1 SU1 from PUT and the upgrade file is identical to the one you can download from CCO supposedly for 12 only? Anyone able to confirm these are the same files? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO
The upgrade files for CUCM 12.5 both SU1 and SU2 both state the following For upgrades from 12.x only. Upgrades from 11.x or earlier are requested via PUT Is this just incorrect wording as far as i am aware there has never been any different files for upgrades from 11 or 12, I have ordered 12.5.1 SU1 from PUT and the upgrade file is identical to the one you can download from CCO supposedly for 12 only? Anyone able to confirm these are the same files? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
