Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

2007-10-17 Thread Sean McGlynn
The following is what appears in the trace that I belive is relevant (it is all 
that appears relevant to eicar)

lstat64(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=69, 
...}) = 0
stat64(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=69, ...}) 
= 0
stat64(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=69, ...}) 
= 0
geteuid32() = 0
open(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, O_RDONLY) = -1 EPERM (Operation not 
permitted)
write(3, WARNING: Can\'t open file /home/j..., 54) = 54
write(2, WARNING: Can\'t open file /home/j..., 54) = 54

I'm trying to find what I can on the -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted), but so 
far nothing.

If anyone has any insight, that would be much appreciated.

Thank you.

Sean


- Original Message 
From: Török Edvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:18:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

On 10/16/07, Sean McGlynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just to be certain (It's not my first day with Linux, but I'm still 
 relatively new to it), you mean NFS as in Network File System, as in mounting 
 a remote file system on the Linux server, correct?  If correct, then no, NFS 
 is not involved.  Both the directory being scanned and the destination 
 directory for quarantine files on on the root filesystem, local to the 
 machine.


Try this:
$ strace clamscan -r --move=/var/log/clam/infected -l
/var/log/clam/dailyclamscanSPM /home/justlgn/test/eicar.com

Then we'll know exactly what happened. Can't open file looks like a
message from the scanner, if the file couldn't be moved, it should
have said that it cannot move the file.

--Edwin
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

2007-10-17 Thread Sean McGlynn
P.S.S

For what it's worth, it wont remove the file either.  Same can't open file 
message is displayed.


- Original Message 
From: Török Edvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:18:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

On 10/16/07, Sean McGlynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just to be certain (It's not my first day with Linux, but I'm still 
 relatively new to it), you mean NFS as in Network File System, as in mounting 
 a remote file system on the Linux server, correct?  If correct, then no, NFS 
 is not involved.  Both the directory being scanned and the destination 
 directory for quarantine files on on the root filesystem, local to the 
 machine.


Try this:
$ strace clamscan -r --move=/var/log/clam/infected -l
/var/log/clam/dailyclamscanSPM /home/justlgn/test/eicar.com

Then we'll know exactly what happened. Can't open file looks like a
message from the scanner, if the file couldn't be moved, it should
have said that it cannot move the file.

--Edwin
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

2007-10-17 Thread Thorolf
Hey,

I don't know if clamuko should deny access to this file. If you are 
running Clamuko then disable it please ;-) or show us ls -al 
/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com

/rl

Sean McGlynn wrote:
 The following is what appears in the trace that I belive is relevant (it is 
 all that appears relevant to eicar)
 
 lstat64(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=69, 
 ...}) = 0
 stat64(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=69, 
 ...}) = 0
 stat64(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=69, 
 ...}) = 0
 geteuid32() = 0
 open(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, O_RDONLY) = -1 EPERM (Operation not 
 permitted)
 write(3, WARNING: Can\'t open file /home/j..., 54) = 54
 write(2, WARNING: Can\'t open file /home/j..., 54) = 54
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

2007-10-17 Thread Sean McGlynn
P.S.

Based on the trace results I believe what you are saying about this not being 
about moving the file is correct.  I don't think the process has gotten as far 
as trying to move the file.

For the record, I can manually move the file:

OES-FS05:/home/justlgn/test # mv eicar.com /var/log/clam/infected/
OES-FS05:/home/justlgn/test # ls -al
total 2
drwxr-xr-x   2 rootroot48 Oct 17 08:55 .
drwxr-xr-x  13 justlgn users 1856 Oct 17 07:55 ..
OES-FS05:/home/justlgn/test # ls -al /var/log/clam/infected/
total 4
drwxr-xr-x  2 rootroot   80 Oct 17 08:55 .
drwxr-xr-x  4 rootroot  232 Oct 17 06:56 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 justlgn users  69 Oct 16 10:56 eicar.com

Thanks again.


- Original Message 
From: Török Edvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:18:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

On 10/16/07, Sean McGlynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just to be certain (It's not my first day with Linux, but I'm still 
 relatively new to it), you mean NFS as in Network File System, as in mounting 
 a remote file system on the Linux server, correct?  If correct, then no, NFS 
 is not involved.  Both the directory being scanned and the destination 
 directory for quarantine files on on the root filesystem, local to the 
 machine.


Try this:
$ strace clamscan -r --move=/var/log/clam/infected -l
/var/log/clam/dailyclamscanSPM /home/justlgn/test/eicar.com

Then we'll know exactly what happened. Can't open file looks like a
message from the scanner, if the file couldn't be moved, it should
have said that it cannot move the file.

--Edwin
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

2007-10-17 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Sean McGlynn schrieb:
 For the record, I can manually move the file:
 
 OES-FS05:/home/justlgn/test # mv eicar.com /var/log/clam/infected/

Judging from the prompt, you are doing this as root, but beneath
your (justlgn's) home directory.

 OES-FS05:/home/justlgn/test # ls -al
 total 2
 drwxr-xr-x   2 rootroot48 Oct 17 08:55 .
 drwxr-xr-x  13 justlgn users 1856 Oct 17 07:55 ..

The test directory is below your home directory, but owned by
root, not by you, and you don't have write/modify access to it.

 OES-FS05:/home/justlgn/test # ls -al /var/log/clam/infected/
 total 4
 drwxr-xr-x  2 rootroot   80 Oct 17 08:55 .
 drwxr-xr-x  4 rootroot  232 Oct 17 06:56 ..
 -rw-r--r--  1 justlgn users  69 Oct 16 10:56 eicar.com

The EICAR test file itself, however, is again owned by you.

What user are you running clamscan as?

HTH
T.

-- 
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik

Tilman Schmidt  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phoenix Software GmbH   Tel. +49 228 97199 0
Geschäftsführer: W. Grießl Fax  +49 228 97199 99
Adolf-Hombitzer-Str. 12   www.phoenixsoftware.de
53227 Bonn, GermanyAmtsgericht Bonn HRB 2934




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

2007-10-17 Thread Sean McGlynn
Tilman,

Thank you for your reply.

Everything is being done as root.

Sean


- Original Message 
From: Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 9:30:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

Sean McGlynn schrieb:
 For the record, I can manually move the file:
 
 OES-FS05:/home/justlgn/test # mv eicar.com /var/log/clam/infected/

Judging from the prompt, you are doing this as root, but beneath
your (justlgn's) home directory.

 OES-FS05:/home/justlgn/test # ls -al
 total 2
 drwxr-xr-x  2 rootroot48 Oct 17 08:55 .
 drwxr-xr-x  13 justlgn users 1856 Oct 17 07:55 ..

The test directory is below your home directory, but owned by
root, not by you, and you don't have write/modify access to it.

 OES-FS05:/home/justlgn/test # ls -al /var/log/clam/infected/
 total 4
 drwxr-xr-x  2 rootroot  80 Oct 17 08:55 .
 drwxr-xr-x  4 rootroot  232 Oct 17 06:56 ..
 -rw-r--r--  1 justlgn users  69 Oct 16 10:56 eicar.com

The EICAR test file itself, however, is again owned by you.

What user are you running clamscan as?

HTH
T.

-- 
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik

Tilman Schmidt  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phoenix Software GmbH  Tel. +49 228 97199 0
Geschäftsführer: W. GrießlFax  +49 228 97199 99
Adolf-Hombitzer-Str. 12  www.phoenixsoftware.de
53227 Bonn, GermanyAmtsgericht Bonn HRB 2934





-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

2007-10-17 Thread Sean McGlynn
That's it!!  When I disable clamuko, the scan results indicated an infected 
file was found (which it was not doing) and the file was moved to the 
quarantine directory.

Now, that said, where does that leave me as far as clumuko?  We rely on that 
for on access scanning.  I assume, now that I'm seeing this, that when clamscan 
attempts to scan the file clamuko won't allow it.  Therefore the file is not 
deemed infected, and not moved.

Are we left in a position where if we want to use clamuko we'll just have to 
manually address each infected file as it is discovered, rather than expecting 
it to be moved to a quarantine area?  Where does this leave with our nightly 
full scans of the file system?  It would seem that our nightly scans will only 
result in notifications that a file can't be opened if it discovers an infected 
file.  Will we need to rely on reviewing the clamd.log file to see if an 
infected file is found?

Thank you for pointing me in the right direction, and for any additional input 
(from anyone).


- Original Message 
From: Thorolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 9:08:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] eicar Identified But Not Moved

Hey,

I don't know if clamuko should deny access to this file. If you are 
running Clamuko then disable it please ;-) or show us ls -al 
/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com

/rl

Sean McGlynn wrote:
 The following is what appears in the trace that I belive is relevant (it is 
 all that appears relevant to eicar)
 
 lstat64(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=69, 
 ...}) = 0
 stat64(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=69, 
 ...}) = 0
 stat64(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=69, 
 ...}) = 0
 geteuid32()= 0
 open(/home/justlgn/test/eicar.com, O_RDONLY) = -1 EPERM (Operation not 
 permitted)
 write(3, WARNING: Can\'t open file /home/j..., 54) = 54
 write(2, WARNING: Can\'t open file /home/j..., 54) = 54
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


[Clamav-users] create cvd using cdiffs?

2007-10-17 Thread ilias seperis
Hello!

Is it possible to create new .cvd files from older
.cvd files, using the appropriate .cdiff files?

If this is not possible (with .cdiff files), do u
think that we can somehow create a binary diff file
from the two .cvd versions (old against new)?

Thanks
ilias

PS: sorry for posting this twice

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


[Clamav-users] Hacktool.PCGI false positive? What to do?

2007-10-17 Thread Jonathan Kamens
Greetings,

Recently, ClamAV version 0.90.2 with main.cvd version 44 and daily.cvd
version 4540 reported that an EXE on one of our servers was infected
with Hacktool.PCGI.  This EXE came from a pretty reputable source, and
when I scanned the same file with Symantec AntiVirus, it claimed that
the file was clean.  So, what now?  Is there any way I can provide
information to the folks who maintain the ClamAV virus definitions to
help them (a) determine whether ClamAV or SAV is correct, and (b) if the
latter, fine-tune the ClamAV signature to prevent this false positive
from recurring?  Basically, what's the protocol for a suspected false
positive?

Thanks,

  jik


___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] Hacktool.PCGI false positive? What to do?

2007-10-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 Recently, ClamAV version 0.90.2 with main.cvd version 44 and daily.cvd
 version 4540 reported that an EXE on one of our servers was infected
 with Hacktool.PCGI.  This EXE came from a pretty reputable source, and
 when I scanned the same file with Symantec AntiVirus, it claimed that
 the file was clean.  So, what now?  Is there any way I can provide
 information to the folks who maintain the ClamAV virus definitions to
 help them (a) determine whether ClamAV or SAV is correct, and (b) if the
 latter, fine-tune the ClamAV signature to prevent this false positive
 from recurring?  Basically, what's the protocol for a suspected false
 positive?
 
 Thanks,
 
   jik

http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi

Mark it as a false positive.

dp
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html