Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [gnujaxp] javax.xml.* conform to jaxp1.1
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:53:01PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > On 22 Aug 2003 11:05:25 +0100 > Nic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Would Debian have a problem with this? It's just a dependancy on the > > package isn't it? Most people will already have libxml2 I suspect. > > No problem with Debian. But maybe with other JDK/ JRE. What does kaffe, > sablevm, jikes, gcj and so think about this? There should not be any problem with SableVM as long as the library is available for the underlying OS. David, SableVM Developer > > -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg >Formateur Cellule Programmation. > > > ___ > Classpath mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath -- --- David Bélanger Graduate Student School of Computer Science McGill University Office: MC226 Web page: http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dbelan2/ Public key: http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dbelan2/public_key.txt ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [gnujaxp] javax.xml.* conform to jaxp1.1
Arnaud Vandyck wrote: On 22 Aug 2003 11:05:25 +0100 Nic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Would Debian have a problem with this? It's just a dependancy on the package isn't it? Most people will already have libxml2 I suspect. No problem with Debian. But maybe with other JDK/ JRE. What does kaffe, sablevm, jikes, gcj and so think about this? An optional dependency on an external library is not a problem for kaffe. Preferably, the external library should be available on seral platforms, since kaffe is trying to be the 'netbsd of virtual machines' and run almost everywhere. But it's not a 'must', for non-essential (i.e. not used in the bootstrap process) libraries. In the best case, there would be a pure java implementation as a fallback for those systems without libxml2. But I guess, that's up to developers on those platforms to implement, which don't have a libxml2 port yet. cheers, dalibor topic ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [gnujaxp] javax.xml.* conform to jaxp1.1
On 22 Aug 2003 11:05:25 +0100 Nic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would Debian have a problem with this? It's just a dependancy on the > package isn't it? Most people will already have libxml2 I suspect. No problem with Debian. But maybe with other JDK/ JRE. What does kaffe, sablevm, jikes, gcj and so think about this? -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [gnujaxp] javax.xml.* conform to jaxp1.1
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've just finished some commits (less than 10) to make gnujaxp compliant > with jaxp1.1 public API. > > We still need to fix the build system (see [1]) and that's all for the > minor changes. > > The major improvment would be to have an transform implementation. Err.. what about our libxslt thing? It's in the classpathx repository. What I had planned to do was make a libxml2 jaxp provider for SAX and DOM. They would fit in very nicely with a libxslt based TRAX. I will get round to the build setup soon. Are you available to test builds? Nic ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [gnujaxp] javax.xml.* conform to jaxp1.1
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's not full java :( but well, if it runs well, no problem. I think we > have to integrate the full jaxp API (so WITH transformations). That's what libxmlj does. It's already used for the gjdoc tool. > Do I understand that Aelfred and gnu.xml.dom will be out? And you plan > to make bindings with libxml2? Not "out" exactly. But there will be a choice. As far as I can see libxml2 will be the standard XML library for the GNU system. XML is so important that it should be standard on the OS so I see no reason for Java not to work through that. > Well, I'd like to have come comments about that (if I understood this > right?). Would Debian have a problem with this? It's just a dependancy on the package isn't it? Most people will already have libxml2 I suspect. -- Nic Ferrier http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [gnujaxp] javax.xml.* conform to jaxp1.1
On 19 Aug 2003 15:32:55 +0100 Nic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've just finished some commits (less than 10) to make gnujaxp compliant > > with jaxp1.1 public API. > > > > We still need to fix the build system (see [1]) and that's all for the > > minor changes. > > > > The major improvment would be to have an transform implementation. > > Err.. what about our libxslt thing? It's in the classpathx repository. It's not full java :( but well, if it runs well, no problem. I think we have to integrate the full jaxp API (so WITH transformations). > What I had planned to do was make a libxml2 jaxp provider for SAX and > DOM. They would fit in very nicely with a libxslt based TRAX. Do I understand that Aelfred and gnu.xml.dom will be out? And you plan to make bindings with libxml2? Well, I'd like to have come comments about that (if I understood this right?). > I will get round to the build setup soon. Are you available to test > builds? Maybe next week. List or private, no problem. -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [gnujaxp] javax.xml.* conform to jaxp1.1
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've just finished some commits (less than 10) to make gnujaxp compliant > with jaxp1.1 public API. > > We still need to fix the build system (see [1]) and that's all for the > minor changes. > > The major improvment would be to have an transform implementation. Ahh, that's good. Should we import that for the release? Brian -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [gnujaxp] javax.xml.* conform to jaxp1.1
On 20 Aug 2003 00:35:13 -0400 Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've just finished some commits (less than 10) to make gnujaxp compliant > > with jaxp1.1 public API. > > > > We still need to fix the build system (see [1]) and that's all for the > > minor changes. > > > > The major improvment would be to have an transform implementation. > > Ahh, that's good. Should we import that for the release? There are very few classes that have been changed but the japi test will, I think, return a 99.99% conformance ;) Regards, -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
