Re: New AWS services supported by Cognitect Labs' aws-api.

[Michael Glaesemann]

> On 2019–12–04, at 16:41, David Chelimsky  wrote:
> 
> Over the past couple of days, AWS has announced a number of new services at 
> AWS re:Invent, and released support for these services in their SDKs. As of 
> today, Cognitect Labs' aws-api supports the new services listed below. See 
> https://github.com/cognitect-labs/aws-api/blob/master/latest-releases.edn for 
> a full listing of all of the services aws-api supports.
> 
> Enjoy!

You rock, David!

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/A4027188-98E5-4C1D-8ABC-DCFF1C5A7DD5%40seespotcode.net.

New AWS services supported by Cognitect Labs' aws-api.

[David Chelimsky]

Over the past couple of days, AWS has announced a number of new services at 
AWS re:Invent, and released support for these services in their SDKs. As of 
today, Cognitect Labs' aws-api supports the new services listed below. See 
https://github.com/cognitect-labs/aws-api/blob/master/latest-releases.edn 
for a full listing of all of the services aws-api supports.

Enjoy!

{com.cognitect.aws/accessanalyzer{:mvn/version "780.2.582.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "Access Analyzer"}
 com.cognitect.aws/codeguru-reviewer {:mvn/version "780.2.584.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer"}
 com.cognitect.aws/codeguruprofiler  {:mvn/version "780.2.584.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "Amazon CodeGuru Profiler"}
 com.cognitect.aws/compute-optimizer {:mvn/version "780.2.584.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "AWS Compute Optimizer"}
 com.cognitect.aws/ebs   {:mvn/version "780.2.584.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "Amazon Elastic Block Store"}
 com.cognitect.aws/elastic-inference {:mvn/version "776.2.582.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "Amazon Elastic  Inference"}
 com.cognitect.aws/frauddetector {:mvn/version "780.2.584.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "Amazon Fraud Detector"}
 com.cognitect.aws/imagebuilder  {:mvn/version "776.2.582.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "EC2 Image Builder"}
 com.cognitect.aws/kendra{:mvn/version "780.2.584.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "AWSKendraFrontendService"}
 com.cognitect.aws/networkmanager{:mvn/version "780.2.584.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "AWS Network Manager"}
 com.cognitect.aws/outposts  {:mvn/version "780.2.584.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "AWS Outposts"}
 com.cognitect.aws/sagemaker-a2i-runtime {:mvn/version "780.2.584.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "Amazon Augmented AI Runtime"}
 com.cognitect.aws/schemas   {:mvn/version "776.2.582.0" 
:aws/serviceFullName "Schemas"}}

README: https://github.com/cognitect-labs/aws-api/
API Docs: https://cognitect-labs.github.io/aws-api/
Changelog: https://github.com/cognitect-labs/aws-api/blob/master/CHANGES.md
Latest Releases of api, endpoints, and all services: 
https://github.com/cognitect-labs/aws-api/blob/master/latest-releases.edn

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/53b31c8c-10ca-464a-818f-a40e7c491d3c%40googlegroups.com.

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

[Alex Miller]

Outreachy seems like a great program but like most things, it requires
significant time and money (https://www.outreachy.org/mentor/).

They need an organization coordinator who can apply, find funds
($6500/intern), find mentors, help develop and assess projects. They also
need mentors who are expected to spend 5-10 hrs/week for 6 weeks during the
project.

I'm not aware of anyone with the time or money to commit to an effort like
this for Clojure.


On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:51 PM Noor Afshan Fathima 
wrote:

> Hello,
> GSOC would be great. Can someone also look into getting Clojure to
> participate in Outreachy?
>
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 10:18 PM, Alex Miller  wrote:
>
>> As far as I'm aware the work involved here is:
>>
>> - submitting the organization application (in Jan)
>> - soliciting and writing up project ideas (in Jan/Feb)
>> - soliciting potential mentors for each project (often there is a natural
>> match between idea and mentor) - spring
>> - pairing up selected students/projects and mentors - spring
>> - getting mentors to write evals for their students - summer
>> - accepting funds - fall
>> - if desired, distributing those funds in some way (when I helped
>> Cognitect run it, we redistributed the funds to pay for students to travel
>> to Clojure conferences) - fall
>>
>> Great opportunity for someone to contribute!
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:35 AM Daniel Compton <
>> daniel.compton.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks, I'm the secretary of Clojurists Together.
>>>
>>> Thanks very much for the background on GSoC and the kind words Alex :)
>>>
>>> Clojurists Together would be happy to help provide the backing admin
>>> infrastructure (bank accounts, international payments, etc.) and oversight
>>> to help run GSoC. However, I don't think anyone on the committee has the
>>> bandwidth to be the primary person to lead the GSoC project; we'd need
>>> someone from the community to volunteer to be that person.
>>>
>>> If someone else wants to run this as part of a different organisation
>>> that's also totally fine with us, don't consider this us calling "dibs".
>>>
>>> Thanks, Daniel.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:34 AM Alex Miller  wrote:
>>>
 GSoC is an amazing opportunity if you get the right combination of an
 appropriately sized project, a motivated student, and a mentor that has
 both sufficient availability and expertise in guiding (like Ambrose's Typed
 Clojure work). If any of those aren't right, the project tends to fizzle
 out or go unused so a lot of the time and effort does not result in an
 effectual end result.

 To some degree, Clojurists Together is doing the same kind of work but
 prioritizing projects that people care about and developers that are
 already "in" the project rather than students starting fresh (and paying
 more for the work). I think CT has created way more total value for the
 community than GSoC ever did.

 But again, depends on goals. If your goal is to connect students more
 closely to Clojure, then GSoC is great for that.


 On Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 2:06:13 PM UTC-6, Daniel Slutsky wrote:
>
> Ag, Alex, many thanks.
>
> These days some of us are trying to think where we should put our
> efforts in the next few months. This might be one of the things we have to
> consider. We'll update if we do.
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 17:20:47 UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote:
>>
>> Any "group" or organization can submit a project to GSoC as long as
>> there are 2+ committers and there are existing releases under an OSI
>> license (which includes EPL). The organization select projects, connects
>> mentors to students, prods people about evaluations, and receives
>> $500/completed student. Students submit proposals (usually these should
>> happen under consultation with the project) and are directly paid 
>> stipends
>> by Google for completed projects. I think the organization application is
>> usually open in January.
>>
>> I think there are several groups in the Clojure ecosystem that would
>> potentially be great orgs for this - CIDER, ClojureBridge, clj-commons, 
>> etc.
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 5:23:43 AM UTC-6, Ag Ibragimov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Would you do it Daniel, would you apply? I apologize for if that
>>> sounds like I'm brazenly pushing you. If I had capacity to do that, I 
>>> would
>>> volunteer, alas I'm afraid I don't even know how that works.
>>> It would be awesome if Clojure once again accepted in GSoC. How can
>>> we (ordinary Clojuristas) help to get there?
>>>
>>> On Sun 01 Dec 2019 at 15:12, Daniel Slutsky 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks so much, that helps to know.
>>> >
>>> > On Sunday, 1 December 2019 06:36:33 UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> We applied and were not ac

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

[Noor Afshan Fathima]

Hello,
GSOC would be great. Can someone also look into getting Clojure to
participate in Outreachy?

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 10:18 PM, Alex Miller  wrote:

> As far as I'm aware the work involved here is:
>
> - submitting the organization application (in Jan)
> - soliciting and writing up project ideas (in Jan/Feb)
> - soliciting potential mentors for each project (often there is a natural
> match between idea and mentor) - spring
> - pairing up selected students/projects and mentors - spring
> - getting mentors to write evals for their students - summer
> - accepting funds - fall
> - if desired, distributing those funds in some way (when I helped
> Cognitect run it, we redistributed the funds to pay for students to travel
> to Clojure conferences) - fall
>
> Great opportunity for someone to contribute!
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:35 AM Daniel Compton <
> daniel.compton.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks, I'm the secretary of Clojurists Together.
>>
>> Thanks very much for the background on GSoC and the kind words Alex :)
>>
>> Clojurists Together would be happy to help provide the backing admin
>> infrastructure (bank accounts, international payments, etc.) and oversight
>> to help run GSoC. However, I don't think anyone on the committee has the
>> bandwidth to be the primary person to lead the GSoC project; we'd need
>> someone from the community to volunteer to be that person.
>>
>> If someone else wants to run this as part of a different organisation
>> that's also totally fine with us, don't consider this us calling "dibs".
>>
>> Thanks, Daniel.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:34 AM Alex Miller  wrote:
>>
>>> GSoC is an amazing opportunity if you get the right combination of an
>>> appropriately sized project, a motivated student, and a mentor that has
>>> both sufficient availability and expertise in guiding (like Ambrose's Typed
>>> Clojure work). If any of those aren't right, the project tends to fizzle
>>> out or go unused so a lot of the time and effort does not result in an
>>> effectual end result.
>>>
>>> To some degree, Clojurists Together is doing the same kind of work but
>>> prioritizing projects that people care about and developers that are
>>> already "in" the project rather than students starting fresh (and paying
>>> more for the work). I think CT has created way more total value for the
>>> community than GSoC ever did.
>>>
>>> But again, depends on goals. If your goal is to connect students more
>>> closely to Clojure, then GSoC is great for that.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 2:06:13 PM UTC-6, Daniel Slutsky wrote:

 Ag, Alex, many thanks.

 These days some of us are trying to think where we should put our
 efforts in the next few months. This might be one of the things we have to
 consider. We'll update if we do.



 On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 17:20:47 UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> Any "group" or organization can submit a project to GSoC as long as
> there are 2+ committers and there are existing releases under an OSI
> license (which includes EPL). The organization select projects, connects
> mentors to students, prods people about evaluations, and receives
> $500/completed student. Students submit proposals (usually these should
> happen under consultation with the project) and are directly paid stipends
> by Google for completed projects. I think the organization application is
> usually open in January.
>
> I think there are several groups in the Clojure ecosystem that would
> potentially be great orgs for this - CIDER, ClojureBridge, clj-commons, 
> etc.
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 5:23:43 AM UTC-6, Ag Ibragimov wrote:
>>
>>
>> Would you do it Daniel, would you apply? I apologize for if that
>> sounds like I'm brazenly pushing you. If I had capacity to do that, I 
>> would
>> volunteer, alas I'm afraid I don't even know how that works.
>> It would be awesome if Clojure once again accepted in GSoC. How can
>> we (ordinary Clojuristas) help to get there?
>>
>> On Sun 01 Dec 2019 at 15:12, Daniel Slutsky 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks so much, that helps to know.
>> >
>> > On Sunday, 1 December 2019 06:36:33 UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote:
>> >>
>> >> We applied and were not accepted for a couple years. Having done
>> some of
>> >> the admin/org stuff in the past, I don't really want to do it
>> again, but an
>> >> organization like Clojurists Together would be great for that part
>> >> (although I'm not looking to add any work to anyone else either).
>> It's not
>> >> really that hard, just a little tedious to deal with the money
>> parts.
>> >>
>> >> On Saturday, November 30, 2019 at 1:37:14 PM UTC-6, Daniel Slutsky
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi all,
>> >>> has there been thoughts about clojure activity in GSoC since
>> 2017?
>> >>>

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

[Alex Miller]

As far as I'm aware the work involved here is:

- submitting the organization application (in Jan)
- soliciting and writing up project ideas (in Jan/Feb)
- soliciting potential mentors for each project (often there is a natural
match between idea and mentor) - spring
- pairing up selected students/projects and mentors - spring
- getting mentors to write evals for their students - summer
- accepting funds - fall
- if desired, distributing those funds in some way (when I helped Cognitect
run it, we redistributed the funds to pay for students to travel to Clojure
conferences) - fall

Great opportunity for someone to contribute!

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:35 AM Daniel Compton <
daniel.compton.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks, I'm the secretary of Clojurists Together.
>
> Thanks very much for the background on GSoC and the kind words Alex :)
>
> Clojurists Together would be happy to help provide the backing admin
> infrastructure (bank accounts, international payments, etc.) and oversight
> to help run GSoC. However, I don't think anyone on the committee has the
> bandwidth to be the primary person to lead the GSoC project; we'd need
> someone from the community to volunteer to be that person.
>
> If someone else wants to run this as part of a different organisation
> that's also totally fine with us, don't consider this us calling "dibs".
>
> Thanks, Daniel.
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:34 AM Alex Miller  wrote:
>
>> GSoC is an amazing opportunity if you get the right combination of an
>> appropriately sized project, a motivated student, and a mentor that has
>> both sufficient availability and expertise in guiding (like Ambrose's Typed
>> Clojure work). If any of those aren't right, the project tends to fizzle
>> out or go unused so a lot of the time and effort does not result in an
>> effectual end result.
>>
>> To some degree, Clojurists Together is doing the same kind of work but
>> prioritizing projects that people care about and developers that are
>> already "in" the project rather than students starting fresh (and paying
>> more for the work). I think CT has created way more total value for the
>> community than GSoC ever did.
>>
>> But again, depends on goals. If your goal is to connect students more
>> closely to Clojure, then GSoC is great for that.
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 2:06:13 PM UTC-6, Daniel Slutsky wrote:
>>>
>>> Ag, Alex, many thanks.
>>>
>>> These days some of us are trying to think where we should put our
>>> efforts in the next few months. This might be one of the things we have to
>>> consider. We'll update if we do.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 17:20:47 UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote:

 Any "group" or organization can submit a project to GSoC as long as
 there are 2+ committers and there are existing releases under an OSI
 license (which includes EPL). The organization select projects, connects
 mentors to students, prods people about evaluations, and receives
 $500/completed student. Students submit proposals (usually these should
 happen under consultation with the project) and are directly paid stipends
 by Google for completed projects. I think the organization application is
 usually open in January.

 I think there are several groups in the Clojure ecosystem that would
 potentially be great orgs for this - CIDER, ClojureBridge, clj-commons, 
 etc.


 On Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 5:23:43 AM UTC-6, Ag Ibragimov wrote:
>
>
> Would you do it Daniel, would you apply? I apologize for if that
> sounds like I'm brazenly pushing you. If I had capacity to do that, I 
> would
> volunteer, alas I'm afraid I don't even know how that works.
> It would be awesome if Clojure once again accepted in GSoC. How can we
> (ordinary Clojuristas) help to get there?
>
> On Sun 01 Dec 2019 at 15:12, Daniel Slutsky 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks so much, that helps to know.
> >
> > On Sunday, 1 December 2019 06:36:33 UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote:
> >>
> >> We applied and were not accepted for a couple years. Having done
> some of
> >> the admin/org stuff in the past, I don't really want to do it
> again, but an
> >> organization like Clojurists Together would be great for that part
> >> (although I'm not looking to add any work to anyone else either).
> It's not
> >> really that hard, just a little tedious to deal with the money
> parts.
> >>
> >> On Saturday, November 30, 2019 at 1:37:14 PM UTC-6, Daniel Slutsky
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> has there been thoughts about clojure activity in GSoC since 2017?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Monday, 6 March 2017 11:35:41 UTC+2, Daniel Solano Gómez wrote:
> 
>  We are pleased to announce that Google has selected Clojure as a
>  mentoring organisation for this year’s summer of code! This means
> that
>  Google will 

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

[Daniel Compton]

Hi folks, I'm the secretary of Clojurists Together.

Thanks very much for the background on GSoC and the kind words Alex :)

Clojurists Together would be happy to help provide the backing admin
infrastructure (bank accounts, international payments, etc.) and oversight
to help run GSoC. However, I don't think anyone on the committee has the
bandwidth to be the primary person to lead the GSoC project; we'd need
someone from the community to volunteer to be that person.

If someone else wants to run this as part of a different organisation
that's also totally fine with us, don't consider this us calling "dibs".

Thanks, Daniel.

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:34 AM Alex Miller  wrote:

> GSoC is an amazing opportunity if you get the right combination of an
> appropriately sized project, a motivated student, and a mentor that has
> both sufficient availability and expertise in guiding (like Ambrose's Typed
> Clojure work). If any of those aren't right, the project tends to fizzle
> out or go unused so a lot of the time and effort does not result in an
> effectual end result.
>
> To some degree, Clojurists Together is doing the same kind of work but
> prioritizing projects that people care about and developers that are
> already "in" the project rather than students starting fresh (and paying
> more for the work). I think CT has created way more total value for the
> community than GSoC ever did.
>
> But again, depends on goals. If your goal is to connect students more
> closely to Clojure, then GSoC is great for that.
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 2:06:13 PM UTC-6, Daniel Slutsky wrote:
>>
>> Ag, Alex, many thanks.
>>
>> These days some of us are trying to think where we should put our efforts
>> in the next few months. This might be one of the things we have to
>> consider. We'll update if we do.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 17:20:47 UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> Any "group" or organization can submit a project to GSoC as long as
>>> there are 2+ committers and there are existing releases under an OSI
>>> license (which includes EPL). The organization select projects, connects
>>> mentors to students, prods people about evaluations, and receives
>>> $500/completed student. Students submit proposals (usually these should
>>> happen under consultation with the project) and are directly paid stipends
>>> by Google for completed projects. I think the organization application is
>>> usually open in January.
>>>
>>> I think there are several groups in the Clojure ecosystem that would
>>> potentially be great orgs for this - CIDER, ClojureBridge, clj-commons, etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 5:23:43 AM UTC-6, Ag Ibragimov wrote:


 Would you do it Daniel, would you apply? I apologize for if that sounds
 like I'm brazenly pushing you. If I had capacity to do that, I would
 volunteer, alas I'm afraid I don't even know how that works.
 It would be awesome if Clojure once again accepted in GSoC. How can we
 (ordinary Clojuristas) help to get there?

 On Sun 01 Dec 2019 at 15:12, Daniel Slutsky 
 wrote:

 > Thanks so much, that helps to know.
 >
 > On Sunday, 1 December 2019 06:36:33 UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote:
 >>
 >> We applied and were not accepted for a couple years. Having done
 some of
 >> the admin/org stuff in the past, I don't really want to do it again,
 but an
 >> organization like Clojurists Together would be great for that part
 >> (although I'm not looking to add any work to anyone else either).
 It's not
 >> really that hard, just a little tedious to deal with the money
 parts.
 >>
 >> On Saturday, November 30, 2019 at 1:37:14 PM UTC-6, Daniel Slutsky
 wrote:
 >>>
 >>> Hi all,
 >>> has there been thoughts about clojure activity in GSoC since 2017?
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> On Monday, 6 March 2017 11:35:41 UTC+2, Daniel Solano Gómez wrote:
 
  We are pleased to announce that Google has selected Clojure as a
  mentoring organisation for this year’s summer of code! This means
 that
  Google will sponsor students from around the world to work on
 projects that
  are part of the Clojure ecosystem. Now that we know that Clojure
 will be
  participating, what happens next?
 
  Getting involved
 
  The student application period will be open from the 20th of March
  through the 3rd of April. In the meantime, there are a number of
 ways to
  get involved:
 
  *Mentors*
 
  If you maintain an open source Clojure(Script) project and would
 like to
  grow it, you should consider becoming a mentor. You can find out
 more about
  what being a mentor is about out on the mentors page
  .
 
  *Students*
 
  While it is still to early to