Re: Best IDE

2013-06-04 Thread Duane Searsmith
Has ne1 looked at emacs or light table or netbeans or eclipse or vim or
Intelli what ... don't know ... let us post an IDE FAQ please!


On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Alan Thompson thompson2...@gmail.comwrote:

 Have any of you looked at Light Table?
 http://www.chris-granger.com/2012/04/12/light-table---a-new-ide-concept/

 I wonder what it would take to get a VIM-like mode available with that?
 Alan


 On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Alex Baranosky 
 alexander.barano...@gmail.com wrote:

 There are things I love and hate about both Emacs and Intellij, so after
 a year of working professionally with a bunch of Clojure-Emacs users, I
 still end up using Intellij about half the time, and get my fair share of
 harassment over it.  I'd like to merge the two actually if possible.


 On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Gary Trakhman gary.trakh...@gmail.comwrote:

 I used eclipse emacs+ for about a year for java code once I had started
 writing clojure in emacs, it made me more productive, but it was a hassle
 to set up.

 Unfortunately, when eclipse updated itself to juno, it broke, and there
 is still no support.

 Going forward, I think this is a more compelling solution to get some of
 the benefits of eclipse in emacs: https://github.com/senny/emacs-eclim

 But, I think it's not quite there yet.


 On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Kelker Ryan theinter...@yandex.comwrote:

 Have you tried Eclipse Emacs+?
 http://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/emacs

 04.06.2013, 21:41, Korny Sietsma ko...@sietsma.com:

 My 2c - I use emacs, I love it.  I don't inflict it on my team, and I
 strongly disagree with it being easy.  To learn the basics, yes, but full
 fluency?  If you have someone fluent in IntelliJ, with the major keystrokes
 in their muscle memory, and an instinctive familiarity with all the gui
 features, they are not going to be as productive in emacs in a hurry.

 Also, while I love the power of emacs, it's really struggling these
 days with the text-only idiom.  Speedbar is no replacement for a graphical
 directory tree.  Coloured text blocks next to modified lines is no
 replacement for being able to hover over a changed line and having a pop-up
 (a real pop-up, that is) tool tip that shows you the changes since the last
 commit.  And don't get me started on selecting fonts and other
 customizations...

 For an IDE for someone not from a vim/emacs background, I'd use
 whichever of Intellij or Eclipse is most familiar.  Eclipse is more
 clojure-friendly, but it has many warts as well - if you know IntelliJ,
 it's clojure plugin is definitely good enough.

 - Korny



 On 3 June 2013 00:05, Wei Qiu w...@qiu.es wrote:

 Hi,

 I used to use slimux+tmux combination until I find vim-fireplace.
 It's really cool. For me it makes life much easier.


 On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:35:34 PM UTC+1, Jeb wrote:

 Any suggestions for a vim man?
 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Cedric Greevey cgre...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Jay Fields j...@jayfields.com
 wrote:
  Use emacs, if you want the path of least resistance

 *boggles*

 Say WHAT?

 You've got to be kidding. That's like suggesting that the path of
 least resistance in taking a trip to L.A. involves climbing the north
 face of Everest instead of using an airplane. In particular, the
 learning curve of emacs and the north face of Everest, in a shocking
 coincidence, turn out to have exactly the same geometry. :)

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com

 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com

 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en




 --
 Jeb Beich
 http://www.red-source.net/jeb


 --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.






 --
 Kornelis Sietsma  korny at my surname dot com http://korny.info
 .fnord { display: none !important; }


 --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - 

Re: Overused phrases in the Clojure community

2011-11-17 Thread Duane Searsmith
Perhaps idiot-magic would sub?

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Sergey Didenko
sergey.dide...@gmail.com wrote:
 I coded mutable Dejkstra algorithm isolated in a single function,
 because it's easier for me to maintain it - I used to write a lot of
 mutable algorithms. But I consider this code not idiomatic though
 useful in my case.

 So I think idiomatic Clojure code is not as ubiquitous as you probably
 mean and the word idiomatic is quite useful for discussions.

 In fact I challenge anyone to give an example of the least
 idiomatic code written in Clojure (using Java interop is cheating).

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
 first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en


Re: clj3D, a Clojure 3D Library

2011-04-06 Thread Duane Searsmith
I watched the screen cast.  This looks like the beginnings of a really nice
tool.  Good Job Alfredo!

Best,
Duane

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Alfredo alfredo.dinap...@gmail.com wrote:

 Enjoy the jar on Clojars!!

 http://clojars.org/org.clojars.charles-stain/clj3d

 Bye!

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Re: Wolfram: 100 years since Principia Mathematica

2010-11-27 Thread Duane Searsmith
I thought his blog had some interesting points.  I enjoyed reading it.  Do I
wish Mathematica was more affordable and/or open source?  Yes.  So what.
That doesn't make Wolfram a lunatic or a fraud.  Remember that
mathematicians like Mandelbrot where also considered frauds at first.

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Alec Battles alec.batt...@gmail.comwrote:

  Thought some Clojure folk might enjoy this:
 
 
 http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2010/11/100-years-since-principia-mathematica/

 Though I don't use Clojure (I follow this list out of curiosity), I
 have a hard time imagining why anything Wolfram writes is interesting,
 and furthermore why any a user of any not-so-mainstream language would
 find it interesting, and even furthermore why a mathematician would.

 And in mathematics, the difference between open-source and
 closed-source is more important, for the reason that any part of a
 mathematical solution that cannot be fully examined is fatal to the
 result.

 --http://www.arachnoid.com/sage/

 Sorry if members of this group consider this off-topic, but I honestly
 couldn't restrain myself...

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comclojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en