Re: [ANN] Component: dependency injection and state management

2014-01-05 Thread Korny Sietsma
Hi - I've been playing with this and I'm a little confused.

I can understand how you use the library to pass around stateful
components, and to start/stop them and wire them up etc.

But I'm not sure I see how it should be used for more general dependency
injection.

I'll pick a concrete example - in the readme you have an ExampleComponent
which calls (get-user database :admin)
the get-user function then gets the connection from the Database
component - but it's still coupled to the particular implementation of
execute-query:

(defn get-user [database username]
  (execute-query (:connection database)
SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = ?
username))

If you wanted to unit test this function, you could pass whatever database
connection thing you'd like - but you couldn't stub out the whole database,
as execute-query is still coupled to the implementation of your database.
 More generally, anything that calls get-user will need to provide some
sort of working database, or mock/stub out the call to execute-query, or
the call to get-user itself.

Is there something I'm missing?  Is there some way you could/would do this
with the component library?  Or is this not the point of the library?

- Korny



On 21 November 2013 02:01, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.comwrote:

 This is a small library/framework I've been working on for a few months.

 https://github.com/stuartsierra/component

 I use this to manage runtime state in combination with my reloaded
 workflow using tools.namespace.[1]

 I've started using this on some personal and professional projects and it
 seems to be working fairly well.


 [1]: http://thinkrelevance.com/blog/2013/06/04/clojure-workflow-reloaded

  --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




-- 
Kornelis Sietsma  korny at my surname dot com http://korny.info
.fnord { display: none !important; }

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN] Component: dependency injection and state management

2014-01-05 Thread Stuart Sierra
Hi Korny,

Components implementing protocols can provide different implementations. In
the Database example, both the real component and the stub component
would have to implement some common protocol that defines the primitive
capabilities needed by the application.

Traditional update-in-place databases are hard to mock, but I sometimes
stub a remote Datomic database with a local in-memory version.

-S



On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Korny Sietsma ko...@sietsma.com wrote:

 Hi - I've been playing with this and I'm a little confused.

 I can understand how you use the library to pass around stateful
 components, and to start/stop them and wire them up etc.

 But I'm not sure I see how it should be used for more general dependency
 injection.

 I'll pick a concrete example - in the readme you have an ExampleComponent
 which calls (get-user database :admin)
 the get-user function then gets the connection from the Database
 component - but it's still coupled to the particular implementation of
 execute-query:

 (defn get-user [database username]
   (execute-query (:connection database)
 SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = ?
 username))

 If you wanted to unit test this function, you could pass whatever database
 connection thing you'd like - but you couldn't stub out the whole database,
 as execute-query is still coupled to the implementation of your database.
  More generally, anything that calls get-user will need to provide some
 sort of working database, or mock/stub out the call to execute-query, or
 the call to get-user itself.

 Is there something I'm missing?  Is there some way you could/would do this
 with the component library?  Or is this not the point of the library?

 - Korny



 On 21 November 2013 02:01, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.comwrote:

 This is a small library/framework I've been working on for a few months.

 https://github.com/stuartsierra/component

 I use this to manage runtime state in combination with my reloaded
 workflow using tools.namespace.[1]

 I've started using this on some personal and professional projects and it
 seems to be working fairly well.


 [1]: http://thinkrelevance.com/blog/2013/06/04/clojure-workflow-reloaded

  --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




 --
 Kornelis Sietsma  korny at my surname dot com http://korny.info
 .fnord { display: none !important; }

 --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
 Google Groups Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/jXnxVZaP2K4/unsubscribe.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN] Component: dependency injection and state management

2014-01-05 Thread Korny Sietsma
Thanks - I'd kind-of worked that out after posting (with the aid of a walk
outside, and a beer!) but it's nice to know I'm on the right track.
On 5 Jan 2014 19:05, Stuart Sierra m...@stuartsierra.com wrote:

 Hi Korny,

 Components implementing protocols can provide different implementations.
 In the Database example, both the real component and the stub component
 would have to implement some common protocol that defines the primitive
 capabilities needed by the application.

 Traditional update-in-place databases are hard to mock, but I sometimes
 stub a remote Datomic database with a local in-memory version.

 -S



 On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Korny Sietsma ko...@sietsma.com wrote:

 Hi - I've been playing with this and I'm a little confused.

 I can understand how you use the library to pass around stateful
 components, and to start/stop them and wire them up etc.

 But I'm not sure I see how it should be used for more general dependency
 injection.

 I'll pick a concrete example - in the readme you have an ExampleComponent
 which calls (get-user database :admin)
 the get-user function then gets the connection from the Database
 component - but it's still coupled to the particular implementation of
 execute-query:

 (defn get-user [database username]
   (execute-query (:connection database)
 SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = ?
 username))

 If you wanted to unit test this function, you could pass whatever
 database connection thing you'd like - but you couldn't stub out the whole
 database, as execute-query is still coupled to the implementation of your
 database.  More generally, anything that calls get-user will need to
 provide some sort of working database, or mock/stub out the call to
 execute-query, or the call to get-user itself.

 Is there something I'm missing?  Is there some way you could/would do
 this with the component library?  Or is this not the point of the library?

 - Korny



 On 21 November 2013 02:01, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.comwrote:

 This is a small library/framework I've been working on for a few months.

 https://github.com/stuartsierra/component

 I use this to manage runtime state in combination with my reloaded
 workflow using tools.namespace.[1]

 I've started using this on some personal and professional projects and
 it seems to be working fairly well.


 [1]: http://thinkrelevance.com/blog/2013/06/04/clojure-workflow-reloaded

  --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




 --
 Kornelis Sietsma  korny at my surname dot com http://korny.info
 .fnord { display: none !important; }

 --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
 Google Groups Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/jXnxVZaP2K4/unsubscribe.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


  --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please 

Re: [ANN] Component: dependency injection and state management

2013-11-21 Thread Jan Herich
This is simple brilliant... The approach proposed and the component 
framework implementing it finally solves the issue with the necessary 
evil (start/stop interactions with statefull components in any bigger 
Clojure app) by cleverly taking only the best ideas (like using inferred 
dependency graph to automatically start/stop components in the correct 
order) from Java DI frameworks like Spring, which i have a lot of 
experience with. Thank you very much for this work.

Dňa štvrtok, 21. novembra 2013 3:01:19 UTC+1 Stuart Sierra napísal(-a):

 This is a small library/framework I've been working on for a few months.

 https://github.com/stuartsierra/component

 I use this to manage runtime state in combination with my reloaded 
 workflow using tools.namespace.[1]

 I've started using this on some personal and professional projects and it 
 seems to be working fairly well.


 [1]: http://thinkrelevance.com/blog/2013/06/04/clojure-workflow-reloaded



-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN] Component: dependency injection and state management

2013-11-21 Thread abp
Hi, great work indeed.

One question though: Why do you prefer declaring dependencies between 
components of a system explicitly instead of using prismatics Graph?

On Thursday, November 21, 2013 3:01:19 AM UTC+1, Stuart Sierra wrote:

 This is a small library/framework I've been working on for a few months.

 https://github.com/stuartsierra/component

 I use this to manage runtime state in combination with my reloaded 
 workflow using tools.namespace.[1]

 I've started using this on some personal and professional projects and it 
 seems to be working fairly well.


 [1]: http://thinkrelevance.com/blog/2013/06/04/clojure-workflow-reloaded



-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN] Component: dependency injection and state management

2013-11-21 Thread Ben Mabey

On Thu Nov 21 07:14:16 2013, Stuart Sierra wrote:

On Thursday, November 21, 2013 7:22:10 AM UTC-5, abp wrote:
 Why do you prefer declaring dependencies between
 components of a system explicitly instead of using
 prismatics Graph?

'Graph' by itself does not preserve the dependency
relationships after constructing the map. But the two
approaches are not incompatible: you can use 'Graph' to
construct the system map, then use 'Component' to manage it.

-S


If you are interesting in taking that approach you can use my 
system-graph which does just that:


https://github.com/RedBrainLabs/system-graph

I spoke with Stuart at the conj about this library and I realized that 
system-graph it is currently relying on an implementation detail in 
order to work.  I haven't had any issues with it but I can see places 
where it will not work.  I plan on fixing this issue so the proper 
'Component' metadata is attached to the system-graph.  When I do that 
I'll release v0.2.0.


-Ben

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN] Component: dependency injection and state management

2013-11-21 Thread Stuart Sierra
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 7:22:10 AM UTC-5, abp wrote:
 Why do you prefer declaring dependencies between
 components of a system explicitly instead of using
 prismatics Graph?

'Graph' by itself does not preserve the dependency
relationships after constructing the map. But the two
approaches are not incompatible: you can use 'Graph' to
construct the system map, then use 'Component' to manage it.

-S

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[ANN] Component: dependency injection and state management

2013-11-20 Thread Stuart Sierra
This is a small library/framework I've been working on for a few months.

https://github.com/stuartsierra/component

I use this to manage runtime state in combination with my reloaded
workflow using tools.namespace.[1]

I've started using this on some personal and professional projects and it
seems to be working fairly well.


[1]: http://thinkrelevance.com/blog/2013/06/04/clojure-workflow-reloaded

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.