Re: Typed Clojure 0.1-alpha2
Oups :) Should have read twice :) He did say, compile-time error. These errors are at run-time - that is, the following is just as obviously bad, but generates no warning until bar is called: (defn foo [x] 1) (defn bar [y] (foo y 1)) ;; compiles fine (bar 5) ;; throws runtime exception On Apr 21, 5:14 pm, Softaddicts lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca wrote: user= (defn a [x y] x) #'user/a user= (a 1) java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args passed to: user$a (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) user= (a 1 2) 1 user= (a 1 2 3) java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args passed to: user$a (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) user= user= (defn b [x ys] x) #'user/b user= (b 1) 1 user= (b 1 2) 1 user= (b) java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args passed to: user$b (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) user= Where's the missing arity validation you are referring to ? Luc Looks interesting. Personally I always thought clojure's handling of function arity is a bit strange. I don't understand why calling a function like this (defn testfn [one two] ...) (test-fn 1) is not at least a compiler warning, possibly with a switch for the compiler for strict checking. I understand that it is not always possible to perform this check, but why not do it when possible? It would make clojure alot safer to use without a test suite covering every code path. On Apr 20, 8:50 pm, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know there are a few people interested in trying Typed Clojure, so I've cut an early alpha release to give a taste. These are *very* early days, but looking through the readme will give you some hints as to what works in this release. Don't expect too much. https://github.com/frenchy64/typed-clojure Please give it a whirl, feedback welcome! Thanks, Ambrose -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Typed Clojure 0.1-alpha2
Looks interesting. Personally I always thought clojure's handling of function arity is a bit strange. I don't understand why calling a function like this (defn testfn [one two] ...) (test-fn 1) is not at least a compiler warning, possibly with a switch for the compiler for strict checking. I understand that it is not always possible to perform this check, but why not do it when possible? It would make clojure alot safer to use without a test suite covering every code path. On Apr 20, 8:50 pm, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know there are a few people interested in trying Typed Clojure, so I've cut an early alpha release to give a taste. These are *very* early days, but looking through the readme will give you some hints as to what works in this release. Don't expect too much. https://github.com/frenchy64/typed-clojure Please give it a whirl, feedback welcome! Thanks, Ambrose -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Typed Clojure 0.1-alpha2
user= (defn a [x y] x) #'user/a user= (a 1) java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args passed to: user$a (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) user= (a 1 2) 1 user= (a 1 2 3) java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args passed to: user$a (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) user= user= (defn b [x ys] x) #'user/b user= (b 1) 1 user= (b 1 2) 1 user= (b) java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args passed to: user$b (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) user= Where's the missing arity validation you are referring to ? Luc Looks interesting. Personally I always thought clojure's handling of function arity is a bit strange. I don't understand why calling a function like this (defn testfn [one two] ...) (test-fn 1) is not at least a compiler warning, possibly with a switch for the compiler for strict checking. I understand that it is not always possible to perform this check, but why not do it when possible? It would make clojure alot safer to use without a test suite covering every code path. On Apr 20, 8:50 pm, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know there are a few people interested in trying Typed Clojure, so I've cut an early alpha release to give a taste. These are *very* early days, but looking through the readme will give you some hints as to what works in this release. Don't expect too much. https://github.com/frenchy64/typed-clojure Please give it a whirl, feedback welcome! Thanks, Ambrose -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Typed Clojure 0.1-alpha2
The ClojureScript compiler doesn't seem to do those kinds of checks, but the Clojure compiler does. On 21 April 2012 09:18, Casper Clausen casp...@gmail.com wrote: Looks interesting. Personally I always thought clojure's handling of function arity is a bit strange. I don't understand why calling a function like this (defn testfn [one two] ...) (test-fn 1) is not at least a compiler warning, possibly with a switch for the compiler for strict checking. I understand that it is not always possible to perform this check, but why not do it when possible? It would make clojure alot safer to use without a test suite covering every code path. On Apr 20, 8:50 pm, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know there are a few people interested in trying Typed Clojure, so I've cut an early alpha release to give a taste. These are *very* early days, but looking through the readme will give you some hints as to what works in this release. Don't expect too much. https://github.com/frenchy64/typed-clojure Please give it a whirl, feedback welcome! Thanks, Ambrose -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Typed Clojure 0.1-alpha2
I assumed he was talking about Clojure on the JVM... We came to a point where specifying the implementation is a requirement when posting on this list to prevent confusion :))) Luc The ClojureScript compiler doesn't seem to do those kinds of checks, but the Clojure compiler does. On 21 April 2012 09:18, Casper Clausen casp...@gmail.com wrote: Looks interesting. Personally I always thought clojure's handling of function arity is a bit strange. I don't understand why calling a function like this (defn testfn [one two] ...) (test-fn 1) is not at least a compiler warning, possibly with a switch for the compiler for strict checking. I understand that it is not always possible to perform this check, but why not do it when possible? It would make clojure alot safer to use without a test suite covering every code path. On Apr 20, 8:50 pm, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know there are a few people interested in trying Typed Clojure, so I've cut an early alpha release to give a taste. These are *very* early days, but looking through the readme will give you some hints as to what works in this release. Don't expect too much. https://github.com/frenchy64/typed-clojure Please give it a whirl, feedback welcome! Thanks, Ambrose -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Typed Clojure 0.1-alpha2
He did say, compile-time error. These errors are at run-time - that is, the following is just as obviously bad, but generates no warning until bar is called: (defn foo [x] 1) (defn bar [y] (foo y 1)) ;; compiles fine (bar 5) ;; throws runtime exception On Apr 21, 5:14 pm, Softaddicts lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca wrote: user= (defn a [x y] x) #'user/a user= (a 1) java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args passed to: user$a (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) user= (a 1 2) 1 user= (a 1 2 3) java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args passed to: user$a (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) user= user= (defn b [x ys] x) #'user/b user= (b 1) 1 user= (b 1 2) 1 user= (b) java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args passed to: user$b (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) user= Where's the missing arity validation you are referring to ? Luc Looks interesting. Personally I always thought clojure's handling of function arity is a bit strange. I don't understand why calling a function like this (defn testfn [one two] ...) (test-fn 1) is not at least a compiler warning, possibly with a switch for the compiler for strict checking. I understand that it is not always possible to perform this check, but why not do it when possible? It would make clojure alot safer to use without a test suite covering every code path. On Apr 20, 8:50 pm, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know there are a few people interested in trying Typed Clojure, so I've cut an early alpha release to give a taste. These are *very* early days, but looking through the readme will give you some hints as to what works in this release. Don't expect too much. https://github.com/frenchy64/typed-clojure Please give it a whirl, feedback welcome! Thanks, Ambrose -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
