Re: [cmake-developers] Better Eclipse CDT support
On Wednesday 27 April 2011, you wrote: Am 27.04.2011 21:28, schrieb Alexander Neundorf: On Monday 25 April 2011, Oliver Buchtala wrote: Am 20.04.2011 22:09, schrieb Alexander Neundorf: ... What would you expect there ? Some structure that gives me acces to the sources of the targets. I suppose, you try to achieve this with sub-projects, but it does not work properly in my case. How does it work not properly ? Don't you have project() calls or are they not created ? While creating a document on my generator implementation, I stumbled over the solution to this problem. [Subprojects] was empty in my setting because the generated link specifications have been invalid. Maybe, Eclipse CDT has changed here (?). You have to use 'locationURI' for virtual folders and 'location' for linked folders. I.e., specify a linked folder like that (in .cproject-file): ... linkedResources link name[Subprojects]/name type2/type locationURIvirtual:/virtual/locationURI /link link name[Subprojects]/LIBCURL/name type2/type locationD:/libraries/cmake-git/Utilities/cmcurl/location /link /linkedResources ... Does the attached patch fix this for you ? For me (Eclipse Helios under Linux) it doesn't make a difference. Alex Yep. This does under Windows as well. Ok. I pushed this now to next, should be in 2.8.5. Alex ___ cmake-developers mailing list cmake-developers@cmake.org http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] Better Eclipse CDT support
Am 06.05.2011 23:26, schrieb Alexander Neundorf: On Saturday 30 April 2011, Oliver Buchtala wrote: Am 30.04.2011 19:56, schrieb Oliver Buchtala: Am 30.04.2011 19:29, schrieb Alexander Neundorf: Nowadays, there are ways to deal better with that: linked folders, virtual folders and linked resources I'm not using Eclipse actively myself, I'm just maintaining the generator. But what people told me is that if the sources are not in a subdir of the project file, then the svn support of Eclipse does not work. Also if the sources are in a linked folder. Did this change ? Ok. Don't know. I have to check... Actually, there happened a lot around folders. Maybe this also works in the meantime. Nope. This is still not supported. My personal opinion is that I do not care about eclipse svn support. Other IDEs don't support this either (or not well). Also, in earlier days I have had not too good experiences with Subversive and Subclipse and always returned to doing svn from command line or other tools (e.g. TortoiseSVN). I looked a bit around in the internet and still find mainly bad remarks for those both plugins and suggestions not to do it from within Eclipse. When I look around my colleagues I find basically only positive remarks about the svn support in Eclipse ;-) This is also my impression from feedback from other users about the Eclipse generators, that the missing svn support in linked folders sucks. Alex Alright. Though, IMO SVN issues should not dominate CDT generation issues. But, you are totally right - this file system limitations in eclipse sucks... I consulted an eclipse guy these days... they are working on that and this is going to be better in e4 (=next generation)... For us, we have to be patient ;) Oliver ___ cmake-developers mailing list cmake-developers@cmake.org http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] Better Eclipse CDT support
On Friday 06 May 2011, Oliver Buchtala wrote: Am 06.05.2011 23:26, schrieb Alexander Neundorf: ... When I look around my colleagues I find basically only positive remarks about the svn support in Eclipse ;-) This is also my impression from feedback from other users about the Eclipse generators, that the missing svn support in linked folders sucks. Alex Alright. Though, IMO SVN issues should not dominate CDT generation issues. But, you are totally right - this file system limitations in eclipse sucks... I consulted an eclipse guy these days... they are working on that and this is going to be better in e4 (=next generation)... Ah. These two blog entries don't make it sound like a CDT for e4 will happen very soon ? http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com/2010/04/cdt-on-e4.html http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com/2010/06/im-not-anti-e4-im-just-busy-with- other.html Alex ___ cmake-developers mailing list cmake-developers@cmake.org http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] Better Eclipse CDT support
Am 07.05.2011 00:02, schrieb Alexander Neundorf: On Friday 06 May 2011, Oliver Buchtala wrote: Am 06.05.2011 23:26, schrieb Alexander Neundorf: ... When I look around my colleagues I find basically only positive remarks about the svn support in Eclipse ;-) This is also my impression from feedback from other users about the Eclipse generators, that the missing svn support in linked folders sucks. Alex Alright. Though, IMO SVN issues should not dominate CDT generation issues. But, you are totally right - this file system limitations in eclipse sucks... I consulted an eclipse guy these days... they are working on that and this is going to be better in e4 (=next generation)... Ah. These two blog entries don't make it sound like a CDT for e4 will happen very soon ? http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com/2010/04/cdt-on-e4.html http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com/2010/06/im-not-anti-e4-im-just-busy-with- other.html Alex Hmmm. We have to be patient? ;) Nevertheless, the SVN problem might still be there, as it is also an issue with the SVN plugin impl... ___ cmake-developers mailing list cmake-developers@cmake.org http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
