Re: Stus-List List discussions on list

2016-11-27 Thread Russ & Melody via CnC-List


Sounds good to me, but sorry to say... not this year.

http://www.greaterfool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WORRIES.png?x64811

Cheers, Russ
Sweet   35 mk-1


At 08:53 AM 26/11/2016, you wrote:
Yup – I am Canadian based except Dec to April 
when I will be eenjoying the Florida 
sunshine.  The web hosting company is in the USA.


If anyone gets or is near to Umatilla, FL, drop 
me a note and we’ll try to get together for a rum & coke.


Stu
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List List discussions on list

2016-11-26 Thread Randy Stafford via CnC-List
Umatilla looks landlocked Stu - what gives?

Cheers,
Randy

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 26, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Stu via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
> 
> Yup – I am Canadian based except Dec to April when I will be enjoying the 
> Florida sunshine.  The web hosting company is in the USA.
>  
> If anyone gets or is near to Umatilla, FL, drop me a note and we’ll try to 
> get together for a rum & coke.
>  
> Stu
>  
>  
> From: Edd Schillay via CnC-List
> Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2016 11:31 AM
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Cc: Edd Schillay
> Subject: Re: Stus-List List discussions on list
>  
> Jerry,
>  
> I think Stu is based in Canada, so Canadian laws would apply (unless the web 
> server is in the US) 
> 
>  
> All the best,
>  
> Edd
>  
> 
> ___
> 
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish 
> to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> 
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List List discussions on list

2016-11-26 Thread Stu via CnC-List
Yup – I am Canadian based except Dec to April when I will be enjoying the 
Florida sunshine.  The web hosting company is in the USA.

If anyone gets or is near to Umatilla, FL, drop me a note and we’ll try to get 
together for a rum & coke.

Stu


From: Edd Schillay via CnC-List 
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2016 11:31 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
Cc: Edd Schillay 
Subject: Re: Stus-List List discussions on list

Jerry,

I think Stu is based in Canada, so Canadian laws would apply (unless the web 
server is in the US) 



All the best,

Edd
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List List discussions on list

2016-11-26 Thread Edd Schillay via CnC-List
Jerry,

I think Stu is based in Canada, so Canadian laws would apply (unless the web 
server is in the US) 


All the best,

Edd

---
Edd M. Schillay
Starship Enterprise
NCC-1701-B
C 37+ | City Island, NY
www.StarshipSailing.com
---
914.332.4400  | Office
914.774.9767  | Mobile
---
Sent via iPhone 7
iPhone. iTypos. iApologize

On Nov 26, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Jerome Tauber via CnC-List 
 wrote:

Open main menu

EditWatch this page
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (a common name for Title 
V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) is a landmark piece of Internet 
legislation in the United States, codified at 47 U.S.C. § 230. Section 
230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an 
"interactive computer service" who publish information provided by others:

No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the 
publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content 
provider.

In analyzing the availability of the immunity offered by this provision, courts 
generally apply a three-prong test. A defendant must satisfy each of the three 
prongs to gain the benefit of the immunity:

The defendant must be a "provider or user" of an "interactive computer service."
The cause of action asserted by the plaintiff must treat the defendant as the 
"publisher or speaker" of the harmful information at issue.
The information must be "provided by another information content provider," 
i.e., the defendant must not be the "information content provider" of the 
harmful information at issue.


___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List List discussions on list

2016-11-26 Thread Jerome Tauber via CnC-List
Open main menu

EditWatch this page
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (a common name for Title 
V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) is a landmark piece of Internet 
legislation in the United States, codified at 47 U.S.C. § 230. Section 
230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an 
"interactive computer service" who publish information provided by others:

No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the 
publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content 
provider.

In analyzing the availability of the immunity offered by this provision, courts 
generally apply a three-prong test. A defendant must satisfy each of the three 
prongs to gain the benefit of the immunity:

The defendant must be a "provider or user" of an "interactive computer service."
The cause of action asserted by the plaintiff must treat the defendant as the 
"publisher or speaker" of the harmful information at issue.
The information must be "provided by another information content provider," 
i.e., the defendant must not be the "information content provider" of the 
harmful information at issue.


___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List List discussions on list

2016-11-26 Thread Joe Della Barba via CnC-List
Certain firms have done vastly more damage to their reputation by trying to
shut down discussion than they ever can recover by trying to stifle the
discussion IMHO.

Joe Della Barba
j...@dellabarba.com


___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Stus-List List discussions on list

2016-11-25 Thread Stu via CnC-List
By now, a lot of people have gone back to the archives and read the posts by 
Mr. Drew.  It is his side of the story as he believes it happened.


The Brokerage is not a member of the list but have been made aware of the 
posts (not by me).  They have taken their own actions against Mr. Drew and 
are probably not at liberty to discuss the matter on this list or any social 
networking site.


Some of our members have offered suggestions on purchasing a boat and many 
of them are good.  But to suggest how to resolve the problems in litigation 
is not our place.  That's what lawyers are for.


Knocking or slamming a particular firm is fine until there is court actions 
involved.  Then it should not be posted here unless you are willing to post 
both sides of the story.  I doubt that will happen.


At the same time, promoting a company because of the service they provided 
is 100% acceptable.  It would be nice if you sent them a note too.


So, at this time the judge (me) has ordered a 'publication ban' on this 
matter.


We will just have to sit back and see what happens.

Stu



___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!