RE: Interesting use of map:mount
Yes, I think. I'm using mod_jk currently in Tomcat. I am set up to alias all of the hosts together (I think). If you start having trouble let me know and I'll look more carefully at what I did. Geoff > -Original Message- > From: Ryan Hoegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 11:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Interesting use of map:mount > > > OK, so it sounds like a sound idea. What container are you running in? > If I decided to run in JBoss/Tomcat behind Apache with mod_jk* do you > think the host matchers would still work? I do all my virtual hosting > in apache httpd.conf now. > > -- > Ryan Hoegg > ISIS Networks > http://www.isisnetworks.net > > Geoff Howard wrote: > > >Not sure what part you were concerned about, but I have been using > >empty uri-prefix for my setup with no problems. I am doing some > >virtual host-type things with cocoon, so I have host matchers/selectors > >in my main sitemap with patterns like *.mydomain.com that mount their > >particular application with an empty uri-prefix. > > > >Geoff > > > > > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Ryan Hoegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:43 PM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Interesting use of map:mount > >> > >> > >>Hey all, > >> > >>I wanted to run my novel usage of map:mount by you all in case I am > >>breaking some seemingly unwritten rule. > >> > >>I have my main sitemap all set up declaring components and such, and > >>then in my pipelines I have this: > >> > >> > >> > >> >>uri-prefix=""/> > >> > >> > >> > >>Note the uri-prefix. The idea is that I have a sitemap for my > >>application that defines the actual application sitemap. I > tried it and > >>it works. Is there some reason I shouldn't be doing this? All the > >>map:mount docs I can find talk about using this for delegating > URI space > >>to other sitemaps. > >> > >>-- > >>Ryan Hoegg > >>ISIS Networks > >>http://www.isisnetworks.net > >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Interesting use of map:mount
OK, so it sounds like a sound idea. What container are you running in? If I decided to run in JBoss/Tomcat behind Apache with mod_jk* do you think the host matchers would still work? I do all my virtual hosting in apache httpd.conf now. -- Ryan Hoegg ISIS Networks http://www.isisnetworks.net Geoff Howard wrote: Not sure what part you were concerned about, but I have been using empty uri-prefix for my setup with no problems. I am doing some virtual host-type things with cocoon, so I have host matchers/selectors in my main sitemap with patterns like *.mydomain.com that mount their particular application with an empty uri-prefix. Geoff -Original Message- From: Ryan Hoegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Interesting use of map:mount Hey all, I wanted to run my novel usage of map:mount by you all in case I am breaking some seemingly unwritten rule. I have my main sitemap all set up declaring components and such, and then in my pipelines I have this: Note the uri-prefix. The idea is that I have a sitemap for my application that defines the actual application sitemap. I tried it and it works. Is there some reason I shouldn't be doing this? All the map:mount docs I can find talk about using this for delegating URI space to other sitemaps. -- Ryan Hoegg ISIS Networks http://www.isisnetworks.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Interesting use of map:mount
Not sure what part you were concerned about, but I have been using empty uri-prefix for my setup with no problems. I am doing some virtual host-type things with cocoon, so I have host matchers/selectors in my main sitemap with patterns like *.mydomain.com that mount their particular application with an empty uri-prefix. Geoff > -Original Message- > From: Ryan Hoegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Interesting use of map:mount > > > Hey all, > > I wanted to run my novel usage of map:mount by you all in case I am > breaking some seemingly unwritten rule. > > I have my main sitemap all set up declaring components and such, and > then in my pipelines I have this: > > > >uri-prefix=""/> > > > > Note the uri-prefix. The idea is that I have a sitemap for my > application that defines the actual application sitemap. I tried it and > it works. Is there some reason I shouldn't be doing this? All the > map:mount docs I can find talk about using this for delegating URI space > to other sitemaps. > > -- > Ryan Hoegg > ISIS Networks > http://www.isisnetworks.net > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Interesting use of map:mount
We use this at our company for the various projects we are working on as well. We basically have a "clean" cocoon environment that we copy over, and then use our local sitemap file that gets delegated to by this one. Has worked for us. Irv Ryan Hoegg wrote: Hey all, I wanted to run my novel usage of map:mount by you all in case I am breaking some seemingly unwritten rule. I have my main sitemap all set up declaring components and such, and then in my pipelines I have this: Note the uri-prefix. The idea is that I have a sitemap for my application that defines the actual application sitemap. I tried it and it works. Is there some reason I shouldn't be doing this? All the map:mount docs I can find talk about using this for delegating URI space to other sitemaps. -- Ryan Hoegg ISIS Networks http://www.isisnetworks.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting use of map:mount
Hey all, I wanted to run my novel usage of map:mount by you all in case I am breaking some seemingly unwritten rule. I have my main sitemap all set up declaring components and such, and then in my pipelines I have this: Note the uri-prefix. The idea is that I have a sitemap for my application that defines the actual application sitemap. I tried it and it works. Is there some reason I shouldn't be doing this? All the map:mount docs I can find talk about using this for delegating URI space to other sitemaps. -- Ryan Hoegg ISIS Networks http://www.isisnetworks.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
