Re: Cocoon 2.1 (was RE: Question about handling of components)

2002-12-11 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Fabricio Chalub dijo:

 If you are using the 2.1 version there are some samples. Also you can
 check wiki:

 http://outerthought.net/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=DatabaseActions


 No, I'm using 2.0.4.
You can use the the Original Dabatase Actions.

 Regarding this very issue, it seems that many useful features (these
 modules, 'expires', etc.) are present only on 2.1.x, with eventual
 backports to the 2.0.x tree.

 Regarding 2.1, I may be wrong, but my impression is that there hasn't
 been a complete overhaul of the entire Cocoon core since 2.0, so
 probably the 'old' 2.0 components are as stable as ever in 2.1, while
 the new features are still a little turbulent and thus should be used
 with caution.

 Is this feeling true?  Is there anybody here using 2.1.x on production
 servers?  How's the stability?

I am currently using 2.1 in production. It stability seems to be OK. I am
not using all the features. But the 2.1 is almost stable. maybe there is
some hidden bug. I am using mainly, XSP, Modular Database Actions,
Original Database Actions, session-fw and authentication-fw.

Antonio Gallardo

 fc

 -
 Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
 FAQ before posting. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Cocoon 2.1 (was RE: Question about handling of components)

2002-12-11 Thread Geoff Howard


 -Original Message-
 From: Fabricio Chalub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 2:02 PM
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: Cocoon 2.1 (was RE: Question about handling of components)
snip/

 Regarding 2.1, I may be wrong, but my impression is that there
 hasn't been a complete overhaul of the entire Cocoon core since
 2.0, so probably the 'old' 2.0 components are as stable as ever
 in 2.1, while the new features are still a little turbulent and
 thus should be used with caution.

 Is this feeling true?  Is there anybody here using 2.1.x on
 production servers?  How's the stability?

I think the stability you most need to worry about is stability of the API -
meaning that 2.1 status is currently in flux even as to how things work and
what they are named.  If you're going to use 2.1 (as I am on live projects)
you need to at least monitor the dev mailing list for any discussion on any
feature you are using so that you can be forewarned if the API is changing.
You'll also need to be prepared to update from CVS fairly frequently, which
can be a task depending on the complexity of your project and the
sophistication of your own project's build procedures as relate to cocoons.

Geoff Howard


-
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Cocoon 2.1 (was RE: Question about handling of components)

2002-12-11 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Geoff Howard dijo:


 -Original Message-
 From: Fabricio Chalub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 2:02 PM
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: Cocoon 2.1 (was RE: Question about handling of components)
 snip/

 Regarding 2.1, I may be wrong, but my impression is that there
 hasn't been a complete overhaul of the entire Cocoon core since
 2.0, so probably the 'old' 2.0 components are as stable as ever
 in 2.1, while the new features are still a little turbulent and
 thus should be used with caution.

 Is this feeling true?  Is there anybody here using 2.1.x on
 production servers?  How's the stability?

 I think the stability you most need to worry about is stability of the
 API - meaning that 2.1 status is currently in flux even as to how things
 work and what they are named.  If you're going to use 2.1 (as I am on
 live projects) you need to at least monitor the dev mailing list for any
 discussion on any feature you are using so that you can be forewarned if
 the API is changing. You'll also need to be prepared to update from CVS
 fairly frequently, which can be a task depending on the complexity of
 your project and the
 sophistication of your own project's build procedures as relate to
 cocoons.

 Geoff Howard

Yes, the complexity of your project will increase, but the reward for
using the lastest Cocoon developed technology is priceless! ;-D

Antonio Gallardo.


 -
 Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
 FAQ before posting. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]