RE: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9477) posixGroups support for LDAP groups mapping service

[Zheng, Kai]

Hi,

Can anyone help take a look at this why the patch submitting won't trigger the 
checking of HADOOP-QA? Thanks.

Regards,
Kai

-Original Message-
From: Dapeng Sun (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] 
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 11:00 PM
To: Zheng, Kai
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9477) posixGroups support for LDAP groups 
mapping service


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dapeng Sun updated HADOOP-9477:
---

 Target Version/s: 2.0.4-alpha
Affects Version/s: 2.0.4-alpha
   Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> posixGroups support for LDAP groups mapping service
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-9477
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9477
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 2.0.4-alpha
>Reporter: Kai Zheng
>Assignee: Kai Zheng
> Fix For: 2.0.5-beta
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-9477.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 168h
>  Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> It would be nice to support posixGroups for LdapGroupsMapping service. Below 
> is from current description for the provider:
> hadoop.security.group.mapping.ldap.search.filter.group:
> An additional filter to use when searching for LDAP groups. This 
> should be changed when resolving groups against a non-Active Directory 
> installation.
> posixGroups are currently not a supported group class.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators 
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

RE: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9477) posixGroups support for LDAP groups mapping service

[Wang Tianhong]

Hi Zheng
You can resubmit the patch again. Sometimes the Jenkins may not work
well.


On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 07:36 +, Zheng, Kai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can anyone help take a look at this why the patch submitting won't trigger 
> the checking of HADOOP-QA? Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> Kai
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Dapeng Sun (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] 
> Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 11:00 PM
> To: Zheng, Kai
> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9477) posixGroups support for LDAP groups 
> mapping service
> 
> 
>  [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>  ]
> 
> Dapeng Sun updated HADOOP-9477:
> ---
> 
>  Target Version/s: 2.0.4-alpha
> Affects Version/s: 2.0.4-alpha
>Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)
> 
> > posixGroups support for LDAP groups mapping service
> > ---
> >
> > Key: HADOOP-9477
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9477
> > Project: Hadoop Common
> >  Issue Type: Improvement
> >Affects Versions: 2.0.4-alpha
> >Reporter: Kai Zheng
> >Assignee: Kai Zheng
> > Fix For: 2.0.5-beta
> >
> > Attachments: HADOOP-9477.patch
> >
> >   Original Estimate: 168h
> >  Remaining Estimate: 168h
> >
> > It would be nice to support posixGroups for LdapGroupsMapping service. 
> > Below is from current description for the provider:
> > hadoop.security.group.mapping.ldap.search.filter.group:
> > An additional filter to use when searching for LDAP groups. This 
> > should be changed when resolving groups against a non-Active Directory 
> > installation.
> > posixGroups are currently not a supported group class.
> 
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators 
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

RE: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9477) posixGroups support for LDAP groups mapping service

[Zheng, Kai]

Thank you Tianhong. 

Dapeng you can resubmit your patch again as Tianhong told. Thanks.

Regards,
Kai

-Original Message-
From: Wang Tianhong [mailto:wangt...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 3:47 PM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9477) posixGroups support for LDAP groups 
mapping service

Hi Zheng
You can resubmit the patch again. Sometimes the Jenkins may not work well.


On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 07:36 +, Zheng, Kai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can anyone help take a look at this why the patch submitting won't trigger 
> the checking of HADOOP-QA? Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> Kai
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Dapeng Sun (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 11:00 PM
> To: Zheng, Kai
> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9477) posixGroups support for LDAP 
> groups mapping service
> 
> 
>  [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9477?page=com.atlassian.j
> ira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
> 
> Dapeng Sun updated HADOOP-9477:
> ---
> 
>  Target Version/s: 2.0.4-alpha
> Affects Version/s: 2.0.4-alpha
>Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)
> 
> > posixGroups support for LDAP groups mapping service
> > ---
> >
> > Key: HADOOP-9477
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9477
> > Project: Hadoop Common
> >  Issue Type: Improvement
> >Affects Versions: 2.0.4-alpha
> >Reporter: Kai Zheng
> >Assignee: Kai Zheng
> > Fix For: 2.0.5-beta
> >
> > Attachments: HADOOP-9477.patch
> >
> >   Original Estimate: 168h
> >  Remaining Estimate: 168h
> >
> > It would be nice to support posixGroups for LdapGroupsMapping service. 
> > Below is from current description for the provider:
> > hadoop.security.group.mapping.ldap.search.filter.group:
> > An additional filter to use when searching for LDAP groups. This 
> > should be changed when resolving groups against a non-Active Directory 
> > installation.
> > posixGroups are currently not a supported group class.
> 
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA 
> administrators For more information on JIRA, see: 
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Installing Hadoop 2.0.3-alpha

[Mohammad Mustaqeem]

Hi,
I know how to install hadoop 0.20.0. But I don't know how to install
Hadoop 2.0.3-alpha.
I have build the binary distribution from the Hadoop 2.0.3-alpha using
maven.
How can I install?
I am asking because the directory structure is different in both versions.

-- 
*With regards ---*
*Mohammad Mustaqeem*,
M.Tech (CSE)
MNNIT Allahabad
9026604270

[VOTE] Hadoop release candidate 1.2.0-rc1

[Matt Foley]

Hi all,
I have posted the signed tarballs for Hadoop 1.2.0-rc1 at
http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.2.0-rc1/
Release notes are at:
releasenotes_1.2.0-rc1.html

I'm having a little trouble with Nexus (it seems to have forgotten I exist)
but am working on that and will post to Nexus as soon as possible.

In the meantime, unless there are objections, I'd like to start the vote.
Please review this release candidate and vote it for release.  Vote will end
in seven days as usual, at 11:30am PDT on Monday 13 May.

Best regards,
--Matt
(release manager)

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9545) Improve logging in ActiveStandbyElector

[Todd Lipcon (JIRA)]

Todd Lipcon created HADOOP-9545:
---

 Summary: Improve logging in ActiveStandbyElector
 Key: HADOOP-9545
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9545
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: auto-failover, ha
Affects Versions: 2.0.5-beta
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
Priority: Minor


The ActiveStandbyElector currently logs a lot of stuff at DEBUG level which 
would be useful for troubleshooting. We've seen one instance in the wild of a 
ZKFC thinking it should be in standby state when in fact it won the election, 
but the logging is insufficient to understand why. I'd like to bump most of the 
existing DEBUG logs to INFO and add some additional logs as well.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop release candidate 1.2.0-rc1

[Matt Foley]

Friends,
Nexus issues are resolved, and the Nexus staging repository for Hadoop
1.2.0-rc1 properly uploaded.  Thanks for your patience.
--Matt


On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Matt Foley  wrote:

> Hi all,
> I have posted the signed tarballs for Hadoop 1.2.0-rc1 at
> http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.2.0-rc1/
>  Release notes are at:  
> releasenotes_1.2.0-rc1.html
>
> I'm having a little trouble with Nexus (it seems to have forgotten I
> exist) but am working on that and will post to Nexus as soon as possible.
>
> In the meantime, unless there are objections, I'd like to start the vote.
> Please review this release candidate and vote it for release.  Vote will
> end
> in seven days as usual, at 11:30am PDT on Monday 13 May.
>
> Best regards,
> --Matt
> (release manager)
>
>

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9546) "setsid exited with exit code" message on each hadoop command

[Jason Lowe (JIRA)]

Jason Lowe created HADOOP-9546:
--

 Summary: "setsid exited with exit code" message on each hadoop 
command
 Key: HADOOP-9546
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9546
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0.0
Reporter: Jason Lowe


Each hadoop command is printing an INFO message about a setsid exit code.  This 
is at best annoying, and it prevents the start-dfs.sh startup script from 
working properly since the INFO message is interpreted as more namenode hosts 
to connect to.  start-dfs.sh uses {{hdfs getconf -namenodes}} which like other 
hadoop commands prints the extra INFO message.  For example:

{noformat}
$ hdfs getconf -namenodes
2013-05-06 20:11:22,096 INFO  [main] util.Shell 
(Shell.java:isSetsidSupported(311)) - setsid exited with exit code 0
localhost
{noformat}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9547) add isHealthy interface/test to filesystems for JT &c to use

[Steve Loughran (JIRA)]

Steve Loughran created HADOOP-9547:
--

 Summary: add isHealthy interface/test to filesystems for JT &c to 
use
 Key: HADOOP-9547
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9547
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 1.3.0
Reporter: Steve Loughran
Priority: Minor


There are specific {{isHealthy()}} tests for HDFS; in {{DistributedFilesystem}} 
in branch-1; {{HdfsUtils}} in trunk -tests used by layers above. 

All filesystems have the right to be unhealthy; we should make the probe 
something each FS can implement, with a probe operation that can be called 
independent of the underlying FS.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira