[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17836212#comment-17836212 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - steveloughran commented on PR #6719: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6719#issuecomment-2049829358 thanks, merged > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent > h2. Update April 2024: this has been reverted. > It turns out that it complicates debugging. If you want the source when > debugging, the best way is just to check out the hadoop release you are > working with and point your IDE at it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17836211#comment-17836211 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - steveloughran merged PR #6719: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6719 > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent > h2. Update April 2024: this has been reverted. > It turns out that it complicates debugging. If you want the source when > debugging, the best way is just to check out the hadoop release you are > working with and point your IDE at it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17835775#comment-17835775
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822:
-
hadoop-yetus commented on PR #6719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6719#issuecomment-2047773513
:broken_heart: **-1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Logfile | Comment |
|::|--:|:|::|:---:|
| +0 :ok: | reexec | 11m 9s | | Docker mode activated. |
_ Prechecks _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | dupname | 0m 0s | | No case conflicting files
found. |
| +0 :ok: | codespell | 0m 0s | | codespell was not available. |
| +0 :ok: | detsecrets | 0m 0s | | detect-secrets was not available.
|
| +0 :ok: | xmllint | 0m 0s | | xmllint was not available. |
| +1 :green_heart: | @author | 0m 0s | | The patch does not contain
any @author tags. |
| -1 :x: | test4tests | 0m 0s | | The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
|
_ branch-3.3 Compile Tests _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvninstall | 51m 4s | | branch-3.3 passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | compile | 0m 23s | | branch-3.3 passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvnsite | 0m 27s | | branch-3.3 passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 0m 26s | | branch-3.3 passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | shadedclient | 91m 35s | | branch has no errors
when building and testing our client artifacts. |
_ Patch Compile Tests _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvninstall | 7m 23s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | compile | 0m 14s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | javac | 0m 14s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | blanks | 0m 0s | | The patch has no blanks
issues. |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvnsite | 0m 16s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 0m 14s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | shadedclient | 41m 41s | | patch has no errors
when building and testing our client artifacts. |
_ Other Tests _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | unit | 0m 16s | | hadoop-client-api in the patch
passed. |
| +1 :green_heart: | asflicense | 0m 35s | | The patch does not
generate ASF License warnings. |
| | | 158m 18s | | |
| Subsystem | Report/Notes |
|--:|:-|
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.44 ServerAPI=1.44 base:
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6719/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
|
| GITHUB PR | https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6719 |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient codespell detsecrets xmllint |
| uname | Linux 5f70c20b1298 5.15.0-94-generic #104-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 9
15:25:40 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh |
| git revision | branch-3.3 / b3e676fb8daee719b7893216b91bdc2b67262fc3 |
| Default Java | Private Build-1.8.0_362-8u372-ga~us1-0ubuntu1~18.04-b09 |
| Test Results |
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6719/1/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 602 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
| modules | C: hadoop-client-modules/hadoop-client-api U:
hadoop-client-modules/hadoop-client-api |
| Console output |
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6719/1/console |
| versions | git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.0 |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-16822
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3
>Reporter: Karel Kolman
>Assignee: Karel Kolman
>Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch
>
>
> h5. Improvement request
> The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime)
> artifacts are super useful.
>
> Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even
> hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging
> purposes.
> Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the
> hadoop client api as well ?
> h5. Dev links
> - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesC
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17835731#comment-17835731 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - steveloughran commented on PR #6719: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6719#issuecomment-2047574043 @pan3793 interesting...though it's probably a yetus change. on long-lived patches I sometimes just delete the old ones, as really its only the last one or two which are of any relevance whatsoever > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent > h2. Update April 2024: this has been reverted. > It turns out that it complicates debugging. If you want the source when > debugging, the best way is just to check out the hadoop release you are > working with and point your IDE at it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17835724#comment-17835724 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - pan3793 commented on PR #6719: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6719#issuecomment-2047470996 @steveloughran One thing not related to this patch. I saw lots of Hadoop ecosystem projects using Yetus, but its comments are too too too long, actually, GitHub supports the collapsed format, which may improve the reviewer experience. https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/organizing-information-with-collapsed-sections > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent > h2. Update April 2024: this has been reverted. > It turns out that it complicates debugging. If you want the source when > debugging, the best way is just to check out the hadoop release you are > working with and point your IDE at it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17835716#comment-17835716 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - steveloughran commented on PR #6719: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6719#issuecomment-2047450904 thanks; let's see what yetus says. +1 pending that > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent > h2. Update April 2024: this has been reverted. > It turns out that it complicates debugging. If you want the source when > debugging, the best way is just to check out the hadoop release you are > working with and point your IDE at it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17835710#comment-17835710 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - pan3793 commented on PR #6719: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6719#issuecomment-2047387046 cc @steveloughran > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent > h2. Update April 2024: this has been reverted. > It turns out that it complicates debugging. If you want the source when > debugging, the best way is just to check out the hadoop release you are > working with and point your IDE at it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17835709#comment-17835709 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - pan3793 opened a new pull request, #6719: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6719 This backport https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6458 to branch-3.3 This reverts commit 2c4ab72a60113e4dd4ef2375e6f9413e519b1044. Justification: this was making debugging through IDEs worse, rather than better. ### Description of PR ### How was this patch tested? ### For code changes: - [ ] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')? - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation? - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, `NOTICE-binary` files? > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent > h2. Update April 2024: this has been reverted. > It turns out that it complicates debugging. If you want the source when > debugging, the best way is just to check out the hadoop release you are > working with and point your IDE at it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17835692#comment-17835692 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - steveloughran commented on PR #6458: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6458#issuecomment-2047244916 merged to 3.4; branch-3.3 had conflicts. @pan3793 if you want it there, create another PR so yetus can validate it. thanks! > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17835690#comment-17835690 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - steveloughran commented on PR #6458: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6458#issuecomment-2047239403 done, though as I pressed sent I realised the title had pulled line #2 up; sorry. will cherrypick to 3.4 > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17835689#comment-17835689 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - steveloughran merged PR #6458: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6458 > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17834624#comment-17834624 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - pan3793 commented on PR #6458: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6458#issuecomment-2041350588 cc @aajisaka @steveloughran > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824609#comment-17824609 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - pan3793 commented on PR #6458: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6458#issuecomment-1984979072 I think we already reached the consensus in the JIRA discussion, could any committer take a look? cc @slfan1989 @sunchao > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build >Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17809090#comment-17809090 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - pan3793 commented on PR #6458: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6458#issuecomment-1902529715 Also cc @pjfanning @Hexiaoqiao > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17807723#comment-17807723
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822:
-
hadoop-yetus commented on PR #6458:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6458#issuecomment-1895825097
:broken_heart: **-1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Logfile | Comment |
|::|--:|:|::|:---:|
| +0 :ok: | reexec | 60m 0s | | Docker mode activated. |
_ Prechecks _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | dupname | 0m 0s | | No case conflicting files
found. |
| +0 :ok: | codespell | 0m 1s | | codespell was not available. |
| +0 :ok: | detsecrets | 0m 1s | | detect-secrets was not available.
|
| +0 :ok: | xmllint | 0m 1s | | xmllint was not available. |
| +1 :green_heart: | @author | 0m 0s | | The patch does not contain
any @author tags. |
| -1 :x: | test4tests | 0m 0s | | The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
|
_ trunk Compile Tests _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvninstall | 47m 43s | | trunk passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | compile | 0m 21s | | trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 |
| +1 :green_heart: | compile | 0m 21s | | trunk passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08 |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvnsite | 0m 25s | | trunk passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 0m 25s | | trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 |
| +1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 0m 23s | | trunk passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08 |
| +1 :green_heart: | shadedclient | 86m 44s | | branch has no errors
when building and testing our client artifacts. |
_ Patch Compile Tests _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvninstall | 7m 21s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | compile | 0m 13s | | the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 |
| +1 :green_heart: | javac | 0m 13s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | compile | 0m 13s | | the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08 |
| +1 :green_heart: | javac | 0m 13s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | blanks | 0m 0s | | The patch has no blanks
issues. |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvnsite | 0m 15s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 0m 14s | | the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 |
| +1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 0m 13s | | the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08 |
| +1 :green_heart: | shadedclient | 38m 7s | | patch has no errors
when building and testing our client artifacts. |
_ Other Tests _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | unit | 0m 18s | | hadoop-client-api in the patch
passed. |
| +1 :green_heart: | asflicense | 0m 34s | | The patch does not
generate ASF License warnings. |
| | | 197m 55s | | |
| Subsystem | Report/Notes |
|--:|:-|
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base:
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6458/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
|
| GITHUB PR | https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6458 |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient codespell detsecrets xmllint |
| uname | Linux 41ba3b906dea 5.15.0-88-generic #98-Ubuntu SMP Mon Oct 2
15:18:56 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 34a7bca208b217efe2fbc0b35f4cab0363456fd4 |
| Default Java | Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08 |
| Multi-JDK versions |
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08 |
| Test Results |
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6458/1/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 566 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
| modules | C: hadoop-client-modules/hadoop-client-api U:
hadoop-client-modules/hadoop-client-api |
| Console output |
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6458/1/console |
| versions | git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-16822
> URL: https:/
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17807674#comment-17807674 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - pan3793 commented on PR #6458: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6458#issuecomment-1895499366 cc @jojochuang @steveloughran > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17807673#comment-17807673 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-16822: - pan3793 opened a new pull request, #6458: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6458 This reverts commit 2c4ab72a60113e4dd4ef2375e6f9413e519b1044. ### Description of PR TL;DR, it generate the wrong source code and messes the code jump in IDEA. See details in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 ### How was this patch tested? Pass CI. ### For code changes: - [ ] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')? - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation? - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, `NOTICE-binary` files? > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17739493#comment-17739493 ] Cheng Pan commented on HADOOP-16822: [~weichiu] I would suggest reverting it directly. If we only disable shadeSourcesContent, an empty source jar will be created, I don't think that helps. In this case, seems decompile is the only choice that can make IDEA jump correctly. > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17737785#comment-17737785 ] Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HADOOP-16822: -- Hi I have no problem reverting the commit. Looks like the problem is with the relocated classpath. would it work better if we remove the line "true" > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17737648#comment-17737648 ] Cheng Pan commented on HADOOP-16822: [~ste...@apache.org] This breaks the Code Jump in IDEA, it's easy to reproduce by importing the latest Spark project in IDEA and trying Jump Code inside Hadoop. > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17737644#comment-17737644 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-16822: - [~chengpan] is the problem that you can't step into the code now, or is it just the complaining about source/binary mismatch? > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17734016#comment-17734016 ] Cheng Pan commented on HADOOP-16822: This actually makes things worse, because the generated source code is incorrect, I propose to revert this patch. !https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26535726/246746288-185daf45-dd90-4c3c-a71b-8857c6f07c0d.png! > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3 > > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17343843#comment-17343843 ] Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HADOOP-16822: -- +1. If you want to raise more awareness of the issue, please add target version. > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17343509#comment-17343509 ] Chao Sun commented on HADOOP-16822: --- Any update on this issue? [~karel.kolman] [~weichiu] [~busbey]. It'd be great if we can get this in to 3.3.1 release. > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17256195#comment-17256195
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-16822:
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 1m
17s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files
found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any
@author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m
0s{color} | {color:red}{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to
include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed
for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify
this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 22m
55s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
17s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.18.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
17s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~18.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
20s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
40m 39s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
18s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.18.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
17s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~18.04-b01 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
57s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
12s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.18.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
12s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
11s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~18.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
11s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
13s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace
issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m
1s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed
XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
16m 24s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
16s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.18.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
15s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~18.04-b01 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
15s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} hadoop-client-api in the
patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {colo
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17256190#comment-17256190 ] Chao Sun commented on HADOOP-16822: --- actually [~karel.kolman] HADOOP-13989 had problems when attempting to add createSourcesJar=true. Will this meet the same issues? > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17256173#comment-17256173 ] Chao Sun commented on HADOOP-16822: --- +1 as well. This will be very useful during debugging. > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17074824#comment-17074824 ] Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HADOOP-16822: -- +1 sorry I forgot this one. > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17057240#comment-17057240
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-16822:
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
49s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 20m
46s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
16s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
20s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
35m 55s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
17s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 19s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
14s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-client-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 56m 37s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.7 Server=19.03.7 Image:yetus/hadoop:c44943d1fc3 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-16822 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12991435/HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient xml |
| uname | Linux eaaa171ff11f 4.15.0-74-generic #84-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 19
08:06:28 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / cf9cf83 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_242 |
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/16790/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 312 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
| modules | C: hadoop-client-modules/hadoop-client-api U:
hadoop-client-modules/hadoop-client-api |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/16790/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-16822
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Karel Kolman
>Assignee: Karel Kolman
>Priority: Major
> Attachment
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17057234#comment-17057234 ] Sean Busbey commented on HADOOP-16822: -- these should only end up in the nexus repo right? If that's the case I think adding source jars would be nice if it works. > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16822) Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17057178#comment-17057178 ] Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HADOOP-16822: -- Thanks [~karel.kolman] I think the only concern I have is the size of the generated artifacts. At some point we had an issue where the generated tarball was ~400mb or more. Not sure how much this is going to be or if this is going to be included in the tarball. [~busbey] any thoughts with regard to shaded artifacts? > Provide source artifacts for hadoop-client-api > -- > > Key: HADOOP-16822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16822 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Karel Kolman >Assignee: Karel Kolman >Priority: Major > Attachments: HADOOP-16822-hadoop-client-api-source-jar.patch > > > h5. Improvement request > The third-party libraries shading hadoop-client-api (& hadoop-client-runtime) > artifacts are super useful. > > Having uber source jar for hadoop-client-api (maybe even > hadoop-client-runtime) would be great for downstream development & debugging > purposes. > Are there any obstacles or objections against providing fat jar with all the > hadoop client api as well ? > h5. Dev links > - *maven-shaded-plugin* and its *shadeSourcesContent* attribute > - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#shadeSourcesContent -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
