[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-09-14 Thread Andras Bokor (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15490620#comment-15490620
 ] 

Andras Bokor commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

Thanks a lot for all of your help [~anu].

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Fix For: 2.9.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.06.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-29 Thread Andras Bokor (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15446763#comment-15446763
 ] 

Andras Bokor commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

Thanks a lot [~anu],

Should this patch be available on branch-2? It only adds some JUnit tests.
In addition, this ticket was blocked by one of my other tickets: HADOOP-13073. 
HADOOP-13073 was not merged into branch-2 so {{testMkdirsWithUmask}} will not 
pass.

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.06.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-29 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15446384#comment-15446384
 ] 

Hudson commented on HADOOP-7363:


SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #10365 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/10365/])
HADOOP-7363. TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed. Contributed by 
(aengineer: rev e1ad598cef61cbd3a6f505f40221c8140a36b7e4)
* (edit) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileSystemContractBaseTest.java
* (add) 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestRawLocalFileSystemContract.java


> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.06.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-29 Thread Anu Engineer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15446357#comment-15446357
 ] 

Anu Engineer commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

[~boky01] Thanks for taking care of this. I have committed this to Trunk , I am 
not resolving this since there are some conflicts when applying to branch-2. 
Could you please post a patch for branch-2 too. I will use this same jira to 
commit to branch-2 too.



> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.06.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-29 Thread Anu Engineer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15446230#comment-15446230
 ] 

Anu Engineer commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

+1, Sorry I missed that. I will commit this shortly.

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.06.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-29 Thread Andras Bokor (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15445725#comment-15445725
 ] 

Andras Bokor commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

Hi [~anu],

That is why I overwrote {{path()}} method in 
{{TestRawLocalFileSystemContract}}. The tests will work into target directory. 
The {{GenericTestUtils.getTempPath(pathString)}} will return with taget 
directory + pathString.

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.06.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-26 Thread Anu Engineer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15439414#comment-15439414
 ] 

Anu Engineer commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

Thanks for the new patch. It looks really good. One small issue, my apologies 
for not noticing this in the earlier code reviews.
We seem to use a path ==> "/test/newDir" shouldn't this be relative to the test 
directory rather than absolute path ? Otherwise the patch is good to go.

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.06.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-26 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15439350#comment-15439350
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7363:
---

| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
19s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 
39s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
47s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
53s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
13s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
19s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
45s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 
36s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  6m 
46s{color} | {color:green} root generated 0 new + 709 unchanged - 1 fixed = 709 
total (was 710) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  8m  
8s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 38m 15s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:9560f25 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-7363 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12824522/HADOOP-7363.05.patch |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 9b9caaa0f634 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | trunk / 13fb1b5 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_101 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10382/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10382/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.06.patch

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-22 Thread Anu Engineer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15431126#comment-15431126
 ] 

Anu Engineer commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

[~boky01] Thank you for your comments. I do agree that a deeper cleanup in 
another JIRA is useful. However  I do feel that we should *not* check-in the 
current change as is .. where we catch an exception, log a warn and continue 
running the test. That pattern is really hard for someone to understand. While 
I do see that there are a bunch of things that you mentioned that needs 
cleanup, committing this fragment of code would be confusing to other 
maintainers.

so if you don't mind, let us fix this one issue in this JIRA and get this 
committed or fix all the things you are mentioning in this change list itself, 
either one works.

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-22 Thread Andras Bokor (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15430932#comment-15430932
 ] 

Andras Bokor commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

Hi [~anu],

Good point. In addition I would use Assume framework so the test would be 
skipped instead of passed in case of S3.
The problem is that this test is based on JUnit3 but I am not sure if changing 
to JUnit4 is out of scope on this ticket or not. If so I can create another 
clean up ticket to take care with this and other issues (IDE, checkstyle 
warnings, {{testFilesystemIsCaseSensitive}} could also use Assume, and so on).
What do you think?

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-19 Thread Anu Engineer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15428366#comment-15428366
 ] 

Anu Engineer commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

[~boky01] Thanks for taking time out to explain this to me. Now that I 
understand why you are doing this, may I suggest that we re-write that try 
catch as a function, something like isS3a(fs) and then the code would look like

if (!isS3a(fs)) {
// assume it is a raw file system
}

I feel that might add more clarity to code rather than just continuing the face 
of an exception, which would make the next developer reading code wonder if 
that is a bug.


> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-19 Thread Andras Bokor (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15428223#comment-15428223
 ] 

Andras Bokor commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

Test fail is unrelated.

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-19 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15427916#comment-15427916
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7363:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
16s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 
38s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
45s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
54s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
13s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
19s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  6m 
42s{color} | {color:green} root generated 0 new + 709 unchanged - 1 fixed = 709 
total (was 710) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  7m 42s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-common in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 37m 39s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.net.TestClusterTopology |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:9560f25 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12824522/HADOOP-7363.05.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-7363 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 7475aea66078 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | trunk / 8179f9a |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_101 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10307/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10307/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10307/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
> 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-19 Thread Andras Bokor (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15427857#comment-15427857
 ] 

Andras Bokor commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

Hi [~anu],

I was going to explain but I realized my new patch needs some change.

So the related test checks whether the FileSystem is S3 or not by schema name. 
If it is S3 we skip the test because S3 does not implement permissions.
In case of {{RawLocalFileSystem}} the {{getScheme}} call throws 
{{UnsupportedOperationException}} which does not mean an error happened. 
Actually it is not a problem at all. In that block we just need to check the 
S3. We don't have to stop the test in case of UnsupportedOperationException.

So far the test cases did not run with {{RawLocalFileSystem}}. That is why they 
did not get exception so far.

I am uploading patch 05.

Does it make sense?

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch, HADOOP-7363.05.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-18 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15426882#comment-15426882
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7363:
---

| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
15s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 
42s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
45s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
54s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
20s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
45s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  6m 
42s{color} | {color:green} root generated 0 new + 709 unchanged - 1 fixed = 709 
total (was 710) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  8m  
3s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 38m  2s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:9560f25 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12824403/HADOOP-7363.04.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-7363 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 27db1e9ad139 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | trunk / 0da69c3 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_101 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10298/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10298/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed t

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-18 Thread Anu Engineer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15426831#comment-15426831
 ] 

Anu Engineer commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

[~boky01] Thanks for updating the patch. But I see that we still catch the 
UnsupportedOperationException and then continue the test. That seems little 
strange to me. We do log a WARN though. I am sure I am missing something here, 
could you please take a moment and explain to me why the test is doing this ? 



> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch, HADOOP-7363.04.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-08-17 Thread Anu Engineer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15425447#comment-15425447
 ] 

Anu Engineer commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

[~boky01] Thanks for adding this test case. One small comment. 
{{FileSystemContractBaseTest.java#Line 181}}: After the {{catch 
(UnsupportedOperationException e)}}, we seem to continue. Did you want to abort 
the test at that point ? 

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-07-21 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15387801#comment-15387801
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7363:
---

| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
27s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 
35s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
46s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
54s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
18s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  6m 
57s{color} | {color:green} root generated 0 new + 708 unchanged - 1 fixed = 708 
total (was 709) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
35s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  7m 
20s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
20s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 37m 55s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:9560f25 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12819308/HADOOP-7363.03.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-7363 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux ccdde068dda8 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | trunk / 557a245 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_91 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10056/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10056/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each conc

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-07-21 Thread Andras Bokor (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15387773#comment-15387773
 ] 

Andras Bokor commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

Can somebody review my patch? I got my +1 from Hadoop QA.

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-07-21 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15387740#comment-15387740
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7363:
---

| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
25s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  7m 
 3s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
54s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
57s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
13s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
21s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
44s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 
38s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  7m  
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  7m  
1s{color} | {color:green} root generated 0 new + 708 unchanged - 1 fixed = 708 
total (was 709) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
49s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  7m 
38s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 38m 57s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:9560f25 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12819308/HADOOP-7363.03.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-7363 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 73aba80d7dd7 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | trunk / 557a245 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_91 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10054/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10054/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch, HADOOP-7363.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-7363.03.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each conc

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-07-21 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15387483#comment-15387483
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7363:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
26s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 
59s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  7m  
3s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
24s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
55s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
13s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
20s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 
38s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red}  6m 56s{color} 
| {color:red} root generated 1 new + 708 unchanged - 1 fixed = 709 total (was 
709) {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}  
0m 23s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common: The patch 
generated 3 new + 35 unchanged - 0 fixed = 38 total (was 35) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
53s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  7m 
13s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} asflicense {color} | {color:red}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 1 ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 38m 19s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:9560f25 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12819295/HADOOP-7363.02.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-7363 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux b65402f33702 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | trunk / 557a245 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_91 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| javac | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10053/artifact/patchprocess/diff-compile-javac-root.txt
 |
| checkstyle | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10053/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10053/testReport/ |
| asflicense | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10053/artifact/patchprocess/patch-asflicense-problems.txt
 |
| modules | C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10053/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-07-20 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15386651#comment-15386651
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7363:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m  4s{color} 
| {color:red} HADOOP-7363 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12819094/HADOOP-7363.01.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-7363 |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10036/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-07-20 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15386313#comment-15386313
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7363:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m  4s{color} 
| {color:red} HADOOP-7363 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12819094/HADOOP-7363.01.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-7363 |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10031/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-05-12 Thread Andras Bokor (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15281561#comment-15281561
 ] 

Andras Bokor commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

[^HADOOP-7363.01.patch] was tested on Windows, CentOS and Mac.
Notes:
# I consider Windows and Mac as non-case sensitive filesystem. So related tests 
will skipped.
# I set rename support to false to skip the related tests. See HADOOP-13082 for 
details.
# I overwrote {{path}} method. A lot of tests are based on writing root 
directory which is not permitted on local filesystems. Instead the tests will 
work into target directory.
# {{testLSRootDir}} and {{testListStatusRootDir}} will also work into target 
instead of root directory. It tries to create a directory on root which is not 
allowed to test user. With this solution we are still able to test the listing 
and status checking functions of the filesystem. I did not see any reason to 
force the code to work on root. In case of a raw local fs there is no 
difference between / and other directories (other than permissions). 
# Please help whether I chose correct package for my new test.

In spite of that it fails until HADOOP-13073 resolved/merged a review is 
welcome.

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 0.23.0
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Matt Foley
> Attachments: HADOOP-7363.01.patch
>
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-05-10 Thread Andras Bokor (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15278130#comment-15278130
 ] 

Andras Bokor commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

Where do you think the test should be placed? org.apache.hadoop.fs package 
sounds good?

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 0.23.0
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Matt Foley
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2016-05-04 Thread Andras Bokor (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15271331#comment-15271331
 ] 

Andras Bokor commented on HADOOP-7363:
--

Currently 35 test case fails from 43 with RawLocalFileSystem.

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 0.23.0
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Matt Foley
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed

2011-06-17 Thread Matt Foley (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051327#comment-13051327
 ] 

Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7363:


There is overlap between the intent of this ticket and the existing 
TestFSMainOperationsLocalFileSystem and FSMainOperationsBaseTest.

> TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed
> 
>
> Key: HADOOP-7363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: fs
>Affects Versions: 0.23.0
>Reporter: Matt Foley
>Assignee: Matt Foley
>
> FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete 
> FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for 
> FileSystem behavior.  However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so.  
> RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira