HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20

2010-05-13 Thread Raghava Mutharaju
Hello all,

 I am trying to install HBase and while going through the requirements
(link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2 patches are
for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I apply
Todd Lipcon's patch at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt.
Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures have
changed from 0.20 to 0.21.

http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements


Thank you.

Regards,
Raghava.


Re: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20

2010-05-13 Thread Todd Lipcon
Hi Raghava,

Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it applies
on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop that
already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's CDH2.

-Todd

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju 
m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello all,

 I am trying to install HBase and while going through the requirements
 (link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2 patches are
 for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I apply
 Todd Lipcon's patch at
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt
 .
 Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures have
 changed from 0.20 to 0.21.


 http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements


 Thank you.

 Regards,
 Raghava.




-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera


Re: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20

2010-05-13 Thread Raghava Mutharaju
Hello Todd,

Thank you for the reply. In the cluster I use here, apache Hadoop is
installed. So I have to use that. I am trying out HBase on my laptop first.
Even though I install CDH2, it won't be useful because on the cluster, I
have to work with apache Hadoop. Since version 0.21 is still in development,
there should be a HDFS-630 patch for the current stable release of Hadoop
isn't it?

Regards,
Raghava.

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:

 Hi Raghava,

 Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it
 applies
 on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop that
 already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's CDH2.

 -Todd

 On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju 
 m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hello all,
 
  I am trying to install HBase and while going through the requirements
  (link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2 patches
 are
  for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I
 apply
  Todd Lipcon's patch at
 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt
  .
  Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures have
  changed from 0.20 to 0.21.
 
 
 
 http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
 
 
  Thank you.
 
  Regards,
  Raghava.
 



 --
 Todd Lipcon
 Software Engineer, Cloudera



Re: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20

2010-05-13 Thread Todd Lipcon
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Raghava Mutharaju 
m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello Todd,

Thank you for the reply. In the cluster I use here, apache Hadoop is
 installed. So I have to use that. I am trying out HBase on my laptop first.
 Even though I install CDH2, it won't be useful because on the cluster, I
 have to work with apache Hadoop. Since version 0.21 is still in
 development,
 there should be a HDFS-630 patch for the current stable release of Hadoop
 isn't it?


No, it was not considered for release in Hadoop 0.20.X because it breaks
wire compatibility, and though I've done a workaround to avoid issues
stemming from that, it would be unlikely to pass a backport vote.

-Todd

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:

  Hi Raghava,
 
  Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it
  applies
  on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop that
  already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's CDH2.
 
  -Todd
 
  On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju 
  m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Hello all,
  
   I am trying to install HBase and while going through the
 requirements
   (link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2 patches
  are
   for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I
  apply
   Todd Lipcon's patch at
  
 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt
   .
   Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures have
   changed from 0.20 to 0.21.
  
  
  
 
 http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
  
  
   Thank you.
  
   Regards,
   Raghava.
  
 
 
 
  --
  Todd Lipcon
  Software Engineer, Cloudera
 




-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera


Re: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20

2010-05-13 Thread Raghava Mutharaju
Hello Todd,

Oh, then isn't it a bit contradictory to the instructions on HBase overview
page.

http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements

It says that the current version of HBase works only with 0.20.X and asks
users to apply the patch HDFS-630 but that patch is not available for
0.20.X. Is there any work around for this? Is that patch really required?

Thank you.

Regards,
Raghava.

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:

 On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Raghava Mutharaju 
 m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hello Todd,
 
 Thank you for the reply. In the cluster I use here, apache Hadoop
 is
  installed. So I have to use that. I am trying out HBase on my laptop
 first.
  Even though I install CDH2, it won't be useful because on the cluster, I
  have to work with apache Hadoop. Since version 0.21 is still in
  development,
  there should be a HDFS-630 patch for the current stable release of Hadoop
  isn't it?
 

 No, it was not considered for release in Hadoop 0.20.X because it breaks
 wire compatibility, and though I've done a workaround to avoid issues
 stemming from that, it would be unlikely to pass a backport vote.

 -Todd

 On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:
 
   Hi Raghava,
  
   Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it
   applies
   on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop that
   already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's CDH2.
  
   -Todd
  
   On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju 
   m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com wrote:
  
Hello all,
   
I am trying to install HBase and while going through the
  requirements
(link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2
 patches
   are
for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I
   apply
Todd Lipcon's patch at
   
  
 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt
.
Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures have
changed from 0.20 to 0.21.
   
   
   
  
 
 http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
   
   
Thank you.
   
Regards,
Raghava.
   
  
  
  
   --
   Todd Lipcon
   Software Engineer, Cloudera
  
 



 --
 Todd Lipcon
 Software Engineer, Cloudera



Re: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20

2010-05-13 Thread Raghava Mutharaju
oops, sorry, by really required I meant, would that problem arise only in
any special situations or is it required for normal operations also.

Regards,
Raghava.

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Raghava Mutharaju 
m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello Todd,

 Oh, then isn't it a bit contradictory to the instructions on HBase overview
 page.



 http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements

 It says that the current version of HBase works only with 0.20.X and asks
 users to apply the patch HDFS-630 but that patch is not available for
 0.20.X. Is there any work around for this? Is that patch really required?

 Thank you.

 Regards,
 Raghava.


 On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:

 On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Raghava Mutharaju 
 m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hello Todd,
 
 Thank you for the reply. In the cluster I use here, apache Hadoop
 is
  installed. So I have to use that. I am trying out HBase on my laptop
 first.
  Even though I install CDH2, it won't be useful because on the cluster, I
  have to work with apache Hadoop. Since version 0.21 is still in
  development,
  there should be a HDFS-630 patch for the current stable release of
 Hadoop
  isn't it?
 

 No, it was not considered for release in Hadoop 0.20.X because it breaks
 wire compatibility, and though I've done a workaround to avoid issues
 stemming from that, it would be unlikely to pass a backport vote.

 -Todd

 On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:
 
   Hi Raghava,
  
   Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it
   applies
   on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop
 that
   already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's
 CDH2.
  
   -Todd
  
   On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju 
   m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com wrote:
  
Hello all,
   
I am trying to install HBase and while going through the
  requirements
(link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2
 patches
   are
for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I
   apply
Todd Lipcon's patch at
   
  
 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt
.
Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures
 have
changed from 0.20 to 0.21.
   
   
   
  
 
 http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
   
   
Thank you.
   
Regards,
Raghava.
   
  
  
  
   --
   Todd Lipcon
   Software Engineer, Cloudera
  
 



 --
 Todd Lipcon
 Software Engineer, Cloudera