Prepare for the worst :) esp. Avoid inline conditionals comes to mind...
Mvgr,
Martin
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 06:42, Henri Yandell wrote:
Sounds good. Why not just grab dbcp's and see what we (our code) disagree
with? :)
Hen
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Phil Steitz wrote:
Gary Gregory wrote:
Hello,
Since we now have checkstyle.xml, can we remove checkstyle.properties?
Gary
+1
We should also think about updating this. When I created checkstyle.xml,
I just translated from the existing checkstyle.properties. There is not
much in there. That's OK with me personally, but if we want to consider a
more aggressive set of checks, we might want to do some comparative
shopping among the other commons components. One that has a pretty
comprehensive set of checks is [dbcp].
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mvdb.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
