Re: [lang] text.VariableFormatter to replace Interpolation and MappedMessageFormat (WAS a [POLL])

2005-07-24 Thread Stephen Colebourne

Gary Gregory wrote:

Stephen: Would you like to take a quick look before I remove the other
classes or are you happy just reviewing the new class at your
convenience?


I'll get to it at some point...

Stephen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [lang] text.VariableFormatter to replace Interpolation and MappedMessageFormat (WAS a [POLL])

2005-07-23 Thread Gary Gregory
 I will therefore do so real soon.

FYT: Done; see SVN.

Gary

 -Original Message-
 From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:34 AM
 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
 Subject: [lang] text.VariableFormatter to replace Interpolation and
 MappedMessageFormat (WAS a [POLL])
 
 Hello:
 
 It's been two weeks since I posted the original message below and I've
 not heard negative comments on removing Interpolation and
 MappedMessageFormat from the text package in favor of
VariableFormatter.
 I will therefore do so real soon.
 
 Please raise your hand you disagree.
 
 Thanks,
 Gary
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 4:07 PM
  To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
  Subject: Re: [lang][POLL] text package's mapped replace classes
a.k.a.
  interpolation
 
  Gary Gregory wrote:
   I'd like to get the feel of the community on whether
VariableFormat
 can
   replace Interpolation and MappedMessageFormat? These two latter
 classes
   would be removed.
 
  Certainly this will be the goal, as the current classes have too
much
  duplication.
 
   My goal is to hopefully pick one (VariableFormat) and beef up
those
   tests (VariableFormatTest) and start moving towards a 2.2 release
 with
   the focus being on the a small text package. A la XP: release
early,
   release often. :-)
 
  +1
 
  text will (it seems) consist of VariableFormat, StrTokenizer and
  StrBuilder. Perhaps somewhere we can find a fast thread-safe
  NumberFormat class too.
 
  Stephen
 
 
-
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [lang] text.VariableFormatter to replace Interpolation and MappedMessageFormat (WAS a [POLL])

2005-07-22 Thread Gary Gregory
Stephen: Would you like to take a quick look before I remove the other
classes or are you happy just reviewing the new class at your
convenience?

Thanks,
Gary

 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 3:21 PM
 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
 Subject: Re: [lang] text.VariableFormatter to replace Interpolation
and
 MappedMessageFormat (WAS a [POLL])
 
 +1, although I still haven't been able to review the new class.
 
 Stephen
 
 Steven Caswell wrote:
  +1
 
  On 7/21/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hello:
 
 It's been two weeks since I posted the original message below and
I've
 not heard negative comments on removing Interpolation and
 MappedMessageFormat from the text package in favor of
VariableFormatter.
 I will therefore do so real soon.
 
 Please raise your hand you disagree.
 
 Thanks,
 Gary
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 4:07 PM
 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
 Subject: Re: [lang][POLL] text package's mapped replace classes
a.k.a.
 interpolation
 
 Gary Gregory wrote:
 
 I'd like to get the feel of the community on whether
VariableFormat
 
 can
 
 replace Interpolation and MappedMessageFormat? These two latter
 
 classes
 
 would be removed.
 
 Certainly this will be the goal, as the current classes have too
much
 duplication.
 
 
 My goal is to hopefully pick one (VariableFormat) and beef up
those
 tests (VariableFormatTest) and start moving towards a 2.2 release
 
 with
 
 the focus being on the a small text package. A la XP: release
early,
 release often. :-)
 
 +1
 
 text will (it seems) consist of VariableFormat, StrTokenizer and
 StrBuilder. Perhaps somewhere we can find a fast thread-safe
 NumberFormat class too.
 
 Stephen
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[lang] text.VariableFormatter to replace Interpolation and MappedMessageFormat (WAS a [POLL])

2005-07-21 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello:

It's been two weeks since I posted the original message below and I've
not heard negative comments on removing Interpolation and
MappedMessageFormat from the text package in favor of VariableFormatter.
I will therefore do so real soon. 

Please raise your hand you disagree.

Thanks,
Gary

 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 4:07 PM
 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
 Subject: Re: [lang][POLL] text package's mapped replace classes a.k.a.
 interpolation
 
 Gary Gregory wrote:
  I'd like to get the feel of the community on whether VariableFormat
can
  replace Interpolation and MappedMessageFormat? These two latter
classes
  would be removed.
 
 Certainly this will be the goal, as the current classes have too much
 duplication.
 
  My goal is to hopefully pick one (VariableFormat) and beef up those
  tests (VariableFormatTest) and start moving towards a 2.2 release
with
  the focus being on the a small text package. A la XP: release early,
  release often. :-)
 
 +1
 
 text will (it seems) consist of VariableFormat, StrTokenizer and
 StrBuilder. Perhaps somewhere we can find a fast thread-safe
 NumberFormat class too.
 
 Stephen
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [lang] text.VariableFormatter to replace Interpolation and MappedMessageFormat (WAS a [POLL])

2005-07-21 Thread Steven Caswell
+1

On 7/21/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello:
 
 It's been two weeks since I posted the original message below and I've
 not heard negative comments on removing Interpolation and
 MappedMessageFormat from the text package in favor of VariableFormatter.
 I will therefore do so real soon.
 
 Please raise your hand you disagree.
 
 Thanks,
 Gary
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 4:07 PM
  To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
  Subject: Re: [lang][POLL] text package's mapped replace classes a.k.a.
  interpolation
 
  Gary Gregory wrote:
   I'd like to get the feel of the community on whether VariableFormat
 can
   replace Interpolation and MappedMessageFormat? These two latter
 classes
   would be removed.
 
  Certainly this will be the goal, as the current classes have too much
  duplication.
 
   My goal is to hopefully pick one (VariableFormat) and beef up those
   tests (VariableFormatTest) and start moving towards a 2.2 release
 with
   the focus being on the a small text package. A la XP: release early,
   release often. :-)
 
  +1
 
  text will (it seems) consist of VariableFormat, StrTokenizer and
  StrBuilder. Perhaps somewhere we can find a fast thread-safe
  NumberFormat class too.
 
  Stephen
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [lang] text.VariableFormatter to replace Interpolation and MappedMessageFormat (WAS a [POLL])

2005-07-21 Thread Stephen Colebourne

+1, although I still haven't been able to review the new class.

Stephen

Steven Caswell wrote:

+1

On 7/21/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hello:

It's been two weeks since I posted the original message below and I've
not heard negative comments on removing Interpolation and
MappedMessageFormat from the text package in favor of VariableFormatter.
I will therefore do so real soon.

Please raise your hand you disagree.

Thanks,
Gary



-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 4:07 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang][POLL] text package's mapped replace classes a.k.a.
interpolation

Gary Gregory wrote:


I'd like to get the feel of the community on whether VariableFormat


can


replace Interpolation and MappedMessageFormat? These two latter


classes


would be removed.


Certainly this will be the goal, as the current classes have too much
duplication.



My goal is to hopefully pick one (VariableFormat) and beef up those
tests (VariableFormatTest) and start moving towards a 2.2 release


with


the focus being on the a small text package. A la XP: release early,
release often. :-)


+1

text will (it seems) consist of VariableFormat, StrTokenizer and
StrBuilder. Perhaps somewhere we can find a fast thread-safe
NumberFormat class too.

Stephen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]