Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27589] - MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown
Yes, unfortunately the nightly builds are from HEAD. I'm not sure if we can create both 2.0 and HEAD nightly builds. Anyone know more about this? Mike On Mar 29, 2004, at 4:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589 MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-29 09:27 --- Thanks. It seems that the nightly builds are done on the HEAD only, so I guess I have to retrieve the source from CVS and build myself. Or is there any plan to have nightly builds for 2.0 support also? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27589] - MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown
Mike, I believe the only way to find this out is to approach the infrastructure folks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Oleg On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 15:30, Michael Becke wrote: Yes, unfortunately the nightly builds are from HEAD. I'm not sure if we can create both 2.0 and HEAD nightly builds. Anyone know more about this? Mike On Mar 29, 2004, at 4:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589 MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-29 09:27 --- Thanks. It seems that the nightly builds are done on the HEAD only, so I guess I have to retrieve the source from CVS and build myself. Or is there any plan to have nightly builds for 2.0 support also? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27589] - MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown
Message sent. Mike On Mar 29, 2004, at 4:26 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: Mike, I believe the only way to find this out is to approach the infrastructure folks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Oleg On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 15:30, Michael Becke wrote: Yes, unfortunately the nightly builds are from HEAD. I'm not sure if we can create both 2.0 and HEAD nightly builds. Anyone know more about this? Mike On Mar 29, 2004, at 4:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589 MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-29 09:27 --- Thanks. It seems that the nightly builds are done on the HEAD only, so I guess I have to retrieve the source from CVS and build myself. Or is there any plan to have nightly builds for 2.0 support also? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
