Robert Jasiek wrote:
executed solely by the programs versus executed by supervising
assistance (like the programmers, software, or referees, etc.)
Thats what I suggest: executed by supervising assistance, perfect
or not. I think its the only way. Expecting all the programs to
agree is not very realistic.
Don Dailey wrote:
So I see no point in moving towards Japanese rules for
computer/computer play.
That's ok. Neither do I *for the moment*. There are lots of things
to be done before. I just wanted to hear the opinion of the list
about how it could be done.
Wouldn't it be much finer to focus our efforts on making
the program play better?
Sure. I don't spend much time of this. Since the best
part of our research area is that we can effectively
verify our ideas by playing a game against someone else,
having a reasonable interest in the ruleset is legitimate
and, I'm sure, we all have.
Jacques.
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
