Re: Issue found in service connman ordering

2015-02-04 Thread Patrik Flykt
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 09:14 +, Priyaranjan Singh wrote:
 But as I understood from you, priority ordering is decided by:

There is a case zero, which in normal circumstances doesn't even try to
autoconnect if there already is a connected service. This happens when
PreferredTechnologies is unset.

The case extends so that if PreferredTechnologies is set, and the
connected service is already of the most preferred type, autoconnect is
not run either.

In both these cases there is only one service connected, and it may be
connected in the 'ready' state.

 i) online service over ready service
 ii) In case of same connection status(online or ready), then
 PreferredTechnologies ordering will be considered.

After there is a PreferredTechnology more preferred than the one
connected, the above conditions are considered.

HTH,

Patrik

___
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman


RE: Issue found in service connman ordering

2015-01-30 Thread Priyaranjan Singh
Hello Patrik,

Thanks for clarification.

I made my assumption from: https://01.org/connman/documentation

[General]
PreferredTechnologies = ethernet,wifi,cellular

With PreferredTechnologies enabled, the autoconnected services depend on the 
order in which they are created. Let's say there is one service for ethernet 
and another one for WiFi. If the WiFi service is detected before the ethernet 
one, both will get connected as ethernet, connected later, is preferred over 
WiFi. And as described above, WiFi can still have the default route if it goes 
to state 'online' while the ethernet one stays in 'ready'. If the ordering is 
the opposite with ethernet discovered first, the WiFi service will never be 
considered as ethernet is preferred over WiFi and already connected.


-Converting this to my use case where: PreferredTechnologies = 
wifi,ethernet,Bluetooth

With PreferredTechnologies enabled, the autoconnected services depend on the 
order in which they are created. Let's say there is one service for ethernet 
and another one for WiFi. If the Ethernet  service is detected before the WiFi 
one, both will get connected as WiFi, connected later, is preferred over 
Ethernet. And as described above, Ethernet can still have the default route if 
it goes to state 'online' while the WiFi one stays in 'ready'.

If the ordering is the opposite with WiFi discovered first, the ethernet 
service will never be considered as WiFi is preferred over ethernet and already 
connected.

But as I understood from you, priority ordering is decided by:

i) online service over ready service
ii) In case of same connection status(online or ready), then 
PreferredTechnologies ordering will be considered.
Sometime better connectivity state (better signal strength) also considered. 
Default gateway should not drop its connection status
iii) Services of same technology will be ordered according to 
online status and then  order in which they are created
iv) Order in which service created really matters?


Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,
PriyaranjanS


-Original Message-
From: connman [mailto:connman-boun...@connman.net] On Behalf Of Patrik Flykt
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 1:49 PM
To: connman@connman.net
Subject: Re: Issue found in service connman ordering


Hi,

On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 07:55 +, Priyaranjan Singh wrote:
 PreferredTechnologies = wifi,ethernet,Bluetooth

If the services end up with equal states, i.e. all in 'ready' or all can 
possbly go 'online' the order is wifi first, ethernet second and bluetooth 
third.

The start of a documentation at https://01.org/connman/documentation
tries to explain this.

 Step 2) Connect Ethernet device/phone (data usage on) with target

Actual Service ordering:
 #connmanctl services
 List of all services:
 *AO Wired{ ethernet_22d3f9d281a8_cable }
 *AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }

Expected Service ordering:
 #connmanctl services
 List of all services:
 *AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }
 *AR Wired{ ethernet_22d3f9d281a8_cable }

If the services had both stayed at 'ready' the expected service ordering would 
be the one used. But now ethernet successfully finished the online check, and 
entered 'online' state as a result. PreferredTechnologies is valid for services 
in the same state, and 'online' state is always preferred over 'ready'. If 
there are more than one services that can go 'online', PreferredTechnologies is 
consulted again and the most preferred technology type is the one that is 
selected as the one and only 'online' service at that time.

So this case works as expected.

Cheers,

Patrik


___
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is 
the property of the KPIT Technologies Ltd. It is intended only for the person 
to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not 
authorized to read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this 
message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please 
notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. KPIT 
Technologies Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
___
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman


Re: Issue found in service connman ordering

2015-01-30 Thread Patrik Flykt

Hi,

On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 07:55 +, Priyaranjan Singh wrote:
 PreferredTechnologies = wifi,ethernet,Bluetooth

If the services end up with equal states, i.e. all in 'ready' or all can
possbly go 'online' the order is wifi first, ethernet second and
bluetooth third.

The start of a documentation at https://01.org/connman/documentation
tries to explain this.

 Step 2) Connect Ethernet device/phone (data usage on) with target
 
Actual Service ordering:
 #connmanctl services
 List of all services:
 *AO Wired{ ethernet_22d3f9d281a8_cable }
 *AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }
 
Expected Service ordering:
 #connmanctl services
 List of all services:
 *AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }
 *AR Wired{ ethernet_22d3f9d281a8_cable }

If the services had both stayed at 'ready' the expected service ordering
would be the one used. But now ethernet successfully finished the online
check, and entered 'online' state as a result. PreferredTechnologies is
valid for services in the same state, and 'online' state is always
preferred over 'ready'. If there are more than one services that can go
'online', PreferredTechnologies is consulted again and the most
preferred technology type is the one that is selected as the one and
only 'online' service at that time.

So this case works as expected.

Cheers,

Patrik


___
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman


Re: Issue found in service connman ordering

2015-01-30 Thread Patrik Flykt

Hi,

On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 07:55 +, Priyaranjan Singh wrote:
 2) Test 2:
 
 *AO Wired{ ethernet_4afaf413be54_cable }
 
 Step 2) First connect target device with WiFi mobile phone (portable
 host spot enabled in Access point mode: data usage off)
 
Actual Service ordering:
 ~# connmanctl services
 List of all services:
 *AR Wired{ ethernet_4afaf413be54_cable }
 *AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }

Ethernet should not be able to drop down to 'ready' state like that.
Check if this problem persists with upstream git as there's been tons of
fixes since 1.23. Knowing the amount of fixes applied, I would not use
1.23 anywhere anymore...

Cheers,

Patrik


___
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman


Re: Issue found in service connman ordering

2015-01-29 Thread Patrik Flykt
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 15:15 +0200, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
 And, anyway, as pointed previously, switching to the latest and
 greatest version of ConnMan (1.27 now) is always a good idea!

...and with commit 3ac3eb0d092439247375886fd2a193538e2449df added on top
of version 1.27.

Cheers,

Patrik


___
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman


Re: Issue found in service connman ordering

2015-01-29 Thread Tomasz Bursztyka

Hi,

You are assuming the ordering based on the online state taking over the 
ready state.
However that's flawed, because there is no way you can guaranty for a 
service to get
such online state all the time. There is quite a lot of logic behind the 
internet connectivity
check, and it's not 100% bullet proof. (if you dns servers fails, if the 
distant connectivity check

website is down, etc etc...)
After all, being ready does not mean you cannot access the internet.

If you want to order service, you will have to order them by yourself 
through Service.MoveAfetr()

or Service.MoveBefore() methods.

And, anyway, as pointed previously, switching to the latest and greatest 
version of ConnMan (1.27 now)

is always a good idea!

Tomasz


___
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman


Re: Issue found in service connman ordering

2015-01-29 Thread Patrik Flykt

Hi,

From the provided log I cannot figure out what goes on in your test
cases.

On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 13:01 +, Priyaranjan Singh wrote:
 ii) Connect USB  device in tether mode (data usage on): 
 ethernet_020c1e7b6205_cable

For example in this case, is the device connecting via USB? Why is
tethering mentioned here? If USB is tethering, then USB cannot be used
for connecting to an uplink Internet connetion at the same time.

 State: Online
 Favorite: true
 Connected first time: No
 Data Usage: Enabled
 
 Service order: USB(AO), WiFi(AR)
 Test Result: Failed

What failed? Order, online or something else?

Cheers,

Patrik

___
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman


RE: Issue found in service connman ordering

2015-01-29 Thread Priyaranjan Singh
Hello,

Thanks for reply.

Sorry, I pasted table from MS Word document.

Here are the service ordering issues mentioned in my last email.

Please confirm the failures or clarify in case my understanding is wrong.

Test index: 1
i) Connect WiFi  mobile phone  (data usage on): 
wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none
State: Online
Favorite: true
Connected first time: Yes
Data Usage: Enabled

Service order: Wifi(AO)

ii) Connect USB  device in tether mode (data usage on): 
ethernet_020c1e7b6205_cable
State: Ready
Favorite: true
Connected first time: Yes
Data Usage: Enabled

Service order: Wifi(AO), USB(AR)
Test Result: Passed


Test index: 2
i) connect WiFi mobile phone with data usage disable: 
wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none
State: Ready
Favorite: true
Connected first time: No
Data Usage: Disabled

Service order: Wifi(AR)

ii) Connect USB  device in tether mode (data usage on): 
ethernet_020c1e7b6205_cable
State: Online
Favorite: true
Connected first time: No
Data Usage: Enabled

Service order: USB(AO), WiFi(AR)
Test Result: Failed


Test index: 3
i) connect WiFi mobile phone with data usage disable: 
wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none
State: Ready
Favorite: true
Connected first time: No
Data Usage: Disabled

Service order: Wifi(AR)

ii) Connect USB  device in tether mode (data usage off): 
ethernet_020c1e7b6205_cable
State: Ready
Favorite: true
Connected first time: No
Data Usage: Disabled

Service order: USB(AR), WiFi(AR)
Test Result: Failed

Test index: 4
i) connect WiFi mobile phone with data usage disable: 
wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none
State: Ready
Favorite: true
Connected first time: No
Data Usage: Disabled

Service order: Wifi(AR)

ii) Connect another USB device with data usage enable: 
ethernet_c66422b41680_cable
State: Online
Favorite: true
Connected first time: Yes
Data Usage: Enabled

Service order: USB(AO), WiFi(AR)
Test Result: Failed

Tested on: Connman version: 1.23

Best Regards,
PriyaranjanS



-Original Message-
From: connman [mailto:connman-boun...@connman.net] On Behalf Of Sven Schwedas
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:16 PM
To: connman@connman.net
Subject: Re: Issue found in service connman ordering

On 2015-01-29 13:24, Priyaranjan Singh wrote:
 We are using Connman version: 1.23

1.27 is the last release, and the git master branch has a lot of additional 
fixes. You should re-test with either (and appropriately recent versions of 
wpa_supplicant et. al.) and report any still existing issues in a more readable 
format.

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, / Best Regards, Sven Schwedas Systemadministrator TAO 
Beratungs- und Management GmbH | Lendplatz 45 | A - 8020 Graz
Mail/XMPP: sven.schwe...@tao.at | +43 (0)680 301 7167 http://software.tao.at

This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is 
the property of the KPIT Technologies Ltd. It is intended only for the person 
to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not 
authorized to read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this 
message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please 
notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. KPIT 
Technologies Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
___
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman


Re: Issue found in service connman ordering

2015-01-29 Thread Sven Schwedas
On 2015-01-29 13:24, Priyaranjan Singh wrote:
 We are using Connman version: 1.23

1.27 is the last release, and the git master branch has a lot of
additional fixes. You should re-test with either (and appropriately
recent versions of wpa_supplicant et. al.) and report any still existing
issues in a more readable format.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, / Best Regards,
Sven Schwedas
Systemadministrator
TAO Beratungs- und Management GmbH | Lendplatz 45 | A - 8020 Graz
Mail/XMPP: sven.schwe...@tao.at | +43 (0)680 301 7167
http://software.tao.at



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman

RE: Issue found in service connman ordering

2015-01-29 Thread Priyaranjan Singh
Hello Tomasz  Patrik,

Thanks for your reply.

Here is my configuration of connman:

/etc/connman/main.conf
DefaultAutoConnectTechnologies = ethernet,wifi
PreferredTechnologies = wifi,ethernet,Bluetooth

1) Test 1:

Assumption:
Considering my Preferred Technologies (wifi  ethernet), WiFi discovered first 
and preferred over Ethernet, the Ethernet service will never be considered as 
default gateway till WiFi disconnected.

Basic steps:

Step 1) First connect target device with WiFi mobile phone (portable host spot 
enabled in Access point mode: data usage off)
# connmanctl services
List of all services:
*AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }


Step 2) Connect Ethernet device/phone (data usage on) with target

   Actual Service ordering:
#connmanctl services
List of all services:
*AO Wired{ ethernet_22d3f9d281a8_cable }
*AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }



   Expected Service ordering:
#connmanctl services
List of all services:
*AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }
*AR Wired{ ethernet_22d3f9d281a8_cable }


2) Test 2:

Assumption:
Considering my Preferred Technologies (wifi  ethernet), WiFi discovered second 
but preferred over Ethernet. But ethernet can still have default route if it 
goes to state 'online' while the WiFi one stays in 'ready'.

Basic steps:

Step 1) Connect Ethernet device/phone (data usage on) with target
~# connmanctl services
List of all services:
*AO Wired{ ethernet_4afaf413be54_cable }

Step 2) First connect target device with WiFi mobile phone (portable host spot 
enabled in Access point mode: data usage off)

   Actual Service ordering:
~# connmanctl services
List of all services:
*AR Wired{ ethernet_4afaf413be54_cable }
*AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }

   Expected Service ordering:
~# connmanctl services
List of all services:
*AO Wired{ ethernet_4afaf413be54_cable }
*AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }

There is a statement given in the documentation:
After that the autoconnected service is continuously used and ConnMan won't 
select a new one until the network goes out of range.
When the service goes out of range or gets disconnected from the network 
infrastructure side, autoconnect is re-run and another favorite and 
autoconnectable service is selected.
The order in which services are considered can be modified by the 
PreferredTechnologies configuration in main.conf. 

As we have specified PreferredTechnologies, hence ordering should be modified.

2) Test 3:
Assumption:
Considering my Preferred Technologies (wifi  ethernet), WiFi discovered first 
and preferred over Ethernet


Basic steps:

Step 1) First connect target device with WiFi mobile phone (portable host spot 
enabled in Access point mode: data usage off)
# connmanctl services
List of all services:
*AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }


Step 2) Connect Ethernet device/phone (data usage off) with target

   Actual Service ordering:
# connmanctl services
List of all services:
*AR Wired{ ethernet_d2a3d4d7d613_cable }
*AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }

   Expected Service ordering:
#connmanctl services
List of all services:
*AR uttejSir { wifi_001cc1a25dff_757474656a536972_managed_none }
*AR Wired{ ethernet_22d3f9d281a8_cable }

Note:  Service ordering is as expected (WiFi default  top: *AO uttejSir  
followed by ethernet) when
WiFi mobile phone (portable host spot enabled in Access point mode: data usage 
on)
Ethernet device/phone (data usage on)

Yes, we will have to use Service.MoveAfter() or Service.MoveBefore() to make 
ordering user defined. But are these use cases a candidate for explicit service 
ordering?

Please correct my understanding if my assumptions are wrong.

Best Regards,
PriyarannjanS

-Original Message-
From: connman [mailto:connman-boun...@connman.net] On Behalf Of Tomasz Bursztyka
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:45 PM
To: connman@connman.net
Subject: Re: Issue found in service connman ordering

Hi,

You are assuming the ordering based on the online state taking over the ready 
state.
However that's flawed, because there is no way you can guaranty for a service 
to get such online state all the time. There is quite a lot of logic behind the 
internet connectivity check, and it's not 100% bullet proof. (if you dns 
servers fails, if the distant connectivity check website is down, etc etc...) 
After all, being ready does not mean you cannot access the internet.

If you want to order service, you will have to order them