Re: DB schema migration
Hi Erik, Took a look at this - it's not actually the jpox tables (we don't use the pre-configured schema), but problems when we turn on autocreation: In an ALTER TABLE statement, the column 'INTEGER_IDX' has been specified as NOT NULL and either the DEFAULT clause was not specified or was specified as DEFAULT NULL. we also have (which is probably because of our metadata): In an ALTER TABLE statement, the column 'CHANGEDATE' has been specified as NOT NULL and either the DEFAULT clause was not specified or was specified as DEFAULT NULL. So I think I'm going to do the migration tool. - Brett On 24/04/2007, at 7:35 AM, Erik Bengtson wrote: Quoting Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Erik - the problem in upgrading is the changes in private tables between versions of jpox that we hadn't given explicit names to. We'd probably appreciate most help in future proofing our jpox use a bit more in case it's internal schema changes again. If you mean by private tables the JPOX_TABLES, you can drop it and JPOX will automatically recreate if it's needed.
Re: is alpha 1 really released?
On 02/05/2007, at 4:10 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: there was discussion on this on another thread on this list...but I will reiterate here that I feel uncomfortable shoving big war files and these alpha-1 artifacts into the main repository. No one is programming against these things in the main repository...we don't even publish incremental snapshots of continuum that I know of during development, so why shove all that stuff into the main repositories, especially for an alpha release...the final artifacts I am all for, but these alpha builds? I don't object, I just don't understand why it would be any different from every other alpha thing in the repository :) Personally, I see this as more of a milestone than an alpha release anyway. Anyway, I think we can at least put it in /dist/. It's just nicer for downloaders/infra that they get a mirror. as for updating the site, its on my list of things to do, but I haven't tackled it yet, it might only take me a few minutes, but then I haven't released a site at apache yet so...its on my list, just haven't gotten there yet. cool I am set to try and get some time on continuum soon and release an alpha-2 on May 21stmaybe we can make that one have more announcement bits.. yep, at least [EMAIL PROTECTED] (probably not [EMAIL PROTECTED]). - Brett
Re: is alpha 1 really released?
there was discussion on this on another thread on this list...but I will reiterate here that I feel uncomfortable shoving big war files and these alpha-1 artifacts into the main repository. No one is programming against these things in the main repository...we don't even publish incremental snapshots of continuum that I know of during development, so why shove all that stuff into the main repositories, especially for an alpha release...the final artifacts I am all for, but these alpha builds? if everyone wants to say stuff it jesse and just put them up there, I am fine with that, I just don't see the point :) as for updating the site, its on my list of things to do, but I haven't tackled it yet, it might only take me a few minutes, but then I haven't released a site at apache yet so...its on my list, just haven't gotten there yet. I am set to try and get some time on continuum soon and release an alpha-2 on May 21stmaybe we can make that one have more announcement bits.. jesse On 5/2/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/2/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to find the official release, and I can only find the file > in Jesse's home directory, and no announcement. Bit lost. > > Can we do these? > - put in the main repo > - put in /dist/ > - put on the website > - announce to lists / blogs It's under people.apache.org/builds/maven and was quietly announced on the user list: * http://www.nabble.com/Continuum-1.1-alpha-1-t3635978.html As we've discussed, it's an official release and could be mirrored, but for an early alpha, this seems appropriate to me. -- Wendy -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: is alpha 1 really released?
On 5/2/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As we've discussed, it's an official release and could be mirrored, but for an early alpha, this seems appropriate to me. Ack, that's what happens when half the conversation is taking place on IRC -- I'm definitely in favor of linking it from the website and having people blog about it. I'm just not convinced that an early alpha needs the full treatment of mirroring and [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Wendy
Re: is alpha 1 really released?
On 5/2/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to find the official release, and I can only find the file in Jesse's home directory, and no announcement. Bit lost. Can we do these? - put in the main repo - put in /dist/ - put on the website - announce to lists / blogs It's under people.apache.org/builds/maven and was quietly announced on the user list: * http://www.nabble.com/Continuum-1.1-alpha-1-t3635978.html As we've discussed, it's an official release and could be mirrored, but for an early alpha, this seems appropriate to me. -- Wendy
Fwd: Continuum 1.1 alpha 1
forwarding here since this just went to continuum-users -- Forwarded message -- From: Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Apr 23, 2007 9:17 PM Subject: Continuum 1.1 alpha 1 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, its finally happened...continuum has had an alpha release to show off some of the work that has been done over the last year. you can obtain the latest release at the following location. http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1/org/apache/maven/continuum/continuum-plexus-runtime/1.1-alpha-1/continuum-plexus-runtime-1.1-alpha-1-bin.tar.gz war file is -> http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1/org/apache/maven/continuum/continuum-webapp/1.1-alpha-1/continuum-webapp-1.1-alpha-1.war This is the first of the alpha series of continuum, and the plan is to try and get an few alpha's out before we release. There are more issues then I care to think about resolved in this release as well as a number of fun improvements. I am hoping we get some momentum from this and and power through a number of the remaining issues in the jira. If you come a bug or feature request your more then welcome to open the issue in jira at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM. If you do open an issue, please try and include as much information as possible, if we can't replicate, we can't fix. Patches are welcome and your best response will be garnered from hopping on irc and talking to us about it. irc.codehaus.org #continuum One of the things that we need to get spruced up before release is documentation, and if you wish to contribute some, we have a wiki setup for continuum users. http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER thanks much! jesse -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is alpha 1 really released?
I'm trying to find the official release, and I can only find the file in Jesse's home directory, and no announcement. Bit lost. Can we do these? - put in the main repo - put in /dist/ - put on the website - announce to lists / blogs Cheers, Brett
